Performance of bricks and brick masonry prism made using coal fly ash and coal bottom ash

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surender K. Verma ◽  
Deepankar K. Ashish ◽  
Joginder Singh
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Brick Masonry ◽  
Coal Bottom Ash ◽  
Masonry Prism

scholarly journals Reactivity of Ground Coal Bottom Ash to Be Used in Portland Cement

J ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-232
Author(s):  
Esperanza Menéndez ◽  
Cristina Argiz ◽  
Miguel Ángel Sanjuán
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Blended Cement ◽  
Coal Ash ◽  
Pozzolanic Reaction ◽  
Natural Sand ◽  
Coal Bottom Ash ◽  
Novel Material ◽  
Pozzolanic Properties

Ground coal bottom ash is considered a novel material when used in common cement production as a blended cement. This new application must be evaluated by means of the study of its pozzolanic properties. Coal bottom ash, in some countries, is being used as a replacement for natural sand, but in some others, it is disposed of in a landfill, leading thus to environmental problems. The pozzolanic properties of ground coal bottom ash and coal fly ash cements were investigated in order to assess their pozzolanic performance. Proportions of coal fly ash and ground coal bottom ash in the mixes were 100:0, 90:10, 80:20, 50:50, 0:100. Next, multicomponent cements were formulated using 10%, 25% or 35% of ashes. In general, the pozzolanic performance of the ground coal bottom ash is quite similar to that of the coal fly ash. As expected, the pozzolanic reaction of both of them proceeds slowly at early ages, but the reaction rate increases over time. Ground coal bottom ash is a promising novel material with pozzolanic properties which are comparable to that of coal fly ashes. Then, coal bottom ash subjected to an adequate mechanical grinding is suitable to be used to produce common coal-ash cements.

Adsorption of Iron(II) from Acid Mine Drainage Contaminated Groundwater Using Coal Fly Ash, Coal Bottom Ash, and Bentonite Clay

2016 ◽  
Vol 227 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emelda Obianuju Orakwue ◽  
Varinporn Asokbunyarat ◽  
Eldon R. Rene ◽  
Piet N. L. Lens ◽  
Ajit Annachhatre
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Acid Mine Drainage ◽  
Mine Drainage ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Bentonite Clay ◽  
Contaminated Groundwater ◽  
Coal Bottom Ash ◽  
Acid Mine

scholarly journals Coal ash Portland Cement Mortars Sulphate Resistance

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-106
Author(s):  
Esperanza Menéndez ◽  
Cristina Argiz ◽  
Miguel Ángel Sanjuán
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Portland Cement ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Electrical Power ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Coal Ash ◽  
Sodium Sulphate ◽  
Sulphate Attack ◽  
Coal Bottom Ash ◽  
Cement Mortars

Coal fly ash (CFA), coal bottom ash (CBA) are residues produced in thermo-electrical power stations as result of the coal combustion in the same boiler. Therefore, some characteristics of the coal fly ash (CFA) are comparable with those of the coal bottom ash (CBA). Nevertheless, coal bottom ash size is larger than coal fly ash one. Consequently, it was found that it is necessary to grind the coal bottom ash (CBA) to reach a similar size to that one of the CFA. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the performance of Portland cement mortars made with coal fly ash (CFA), coal bottom ash (CBA) or mixes (CFA+CBA), against sulphate attack. The methodology is based on the expansion of slender bars submerged in a sodium sulphate solution (5%) according to the ASTM C-1012/C1012-13 standard. It has been found that mortars elaborated with CEM I 42.5 N (without ashes) presented the largest expansion (0.09%) after a testing period of 330 days. Mortars made with CEM II/A-V exhibited lower expansion (0.03%). Summing up, it can be established that mortar expansion decreases when the coal ash amount increases, independently of the type of coal ash employed. The novelty of this paper relies on the comparison between the performances of Portland cement mortars made with coal fly ash (CFA) or coal bottom ash (CBA) exposed to external sulphate attack. Doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091640 Full Text: PDF

scholarly journals Optimizing and Characterizing Geopolymers from Ternary Blend of Philippine Coal Fly Ash, Coal Bottom Ash and Rice Hull Ash

Materials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kalaw ◽  
Alvin Culaba ◽  
Hirofumi Hinode ◽  
Winarto Kurniawan ◽  
Susan Gallardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Rice Hull ◽  
Ternary Blend ◽  
Rice Hull Ash ◽  
Coal Bottom Ash

scholarly journals Chloride Induced Reinforcement Corrosion in Mortars Containing Coal Bottom Ash and Coal Fly Ash

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esperanza Menéndez ◽  
Cristina Argiz ◽  
Miguel Ángel Sanjuán
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Steel Corrosion ◽  
Chloride Diffusion ◽  
Chloride Ingress ◽  
Chloride Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Coal Bottom Ash ◽  
Coal Ashes

Coal bottom ash is normally used as aggregate in mortars and concretes. When it is ground, its characteristics are modified. Therefore, the assessment of its long-term durability must be realized in depth. In this sense, an accelerated chloride ingress test has been performed on reinforced mortars made of Portland cement with different amounts of coal bottom ash (CBA) and/or coal fly ash (CFA). Corrosion potential and corrosion rate were continuously monitored. Cement replacement with bottom and fly ash had beneficial long-term effects regarding chloride penetration resistance. Concerning corrosion performance, by far the most dominant influencing parameter was the ash content. Chloride diffusion coefficient in natural test conditions decreased from 23 × 10−12 m2/s in cements without coal ashes to 4.5 × 10−12 m2/s in cements with 35% by weight of coal ashes. Moreover, the time to steel corrosion initiation went from 102 h to about 500 h, respectively. Therefore, this work presents experimental evidence that confirms the positive effect of both types of coal ashes (CBA and CFA) with regard to the concrete steel corrosion.

Characterization of Coal Fly Ash, Bottom Ash and their Possibilities as Catalysts for Biodiesel Production

2021 ◽  
Vol 904 ◽  
pp. 413-418
Author(s):  
Wilasinee Kingkam ◽  
Sasikarn Nuchdang ◽  
Dussadee Rattanaphra
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Palm Oil ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Biodiesel Production ◽  
Catalyst Loading ◽  
Free Lime ◽  
Operation Conditions ◽  
Class C

Coal fly ash (CFA) and bottom ash (BA) obtained from coal fired power plants in Thailand and local supplier were characterized using XRF, XRD and N2 adsorption-desorption techniques. Their possibilities for conversion of palm oil into biodiesel were investigated. Selected CFA was also modified with lanthanum (La) at different La loading and the influence of La loading on biodiesel conversion was evaluated. The resulted showed that the Class C CFA as contained large amount of CaO (free lime) could catalyze the transesterification to achieve the highest FAME content of 89% under the operation conditions; the reaction temperature of 200 °C, the reaction pressure of 39 bars, the catalyst loading of 5 wt% of oil, the molar of oil to methanol of 1:30 and the stirring speed of 600 rpm for 5 h. The addition of La on the Class C CFA had a negative effect on conversion of palm oil. The FAME content decreased gradually from 89 to 62% with increasing La loading from 0 to 1 wt%.

scholarly journals Stabilization of Municipal Solid Waste Fly Ash, Obtained by Co-Combustion with Sewage Sludge, Mixed with Bottom Ash Derived by the Same Plant

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 6075
Author(s):  
Ahmad Assi ◽  
Fabjola Bilo ◽  
Alessandra Zanoletti ◽  
Laura Borgese ◽  
Laura Eleonora Depero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Fly Ash ◽  
Sewage Sludge ◽  
Municipal Solid Waste ◽  
Solid Waste ◽  
Coal Fly Ash ◽  
Bottom Ash ◽  
Solid Material ◽  
Flue Gas Desulfurization ◽  
Stabilization Method

This study presents an innovative stabilization method of fly ash derived from co-combustion of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge. Bottom ash, obtained from the same process, is used as a stabilizing agent. The stabilization method involved the use of two other components—flue gas desulfurization residues and coal fly ash. Leaching tests were performed on stabilized samples, aged in a laboratory at different times. The results reveal the reduction of the concentrations of heavy metals, particularly Zn and Pb about two orders of magnitude lower with respect to fly ash. The immobilization of heavy metals on the solid material mainly depends on three factors—the amount of used ash, the concentrations of Zn and Pb in as-received fly ash and the pH of the solution of the final materials. The inert powder, obtained after the stabilization, is a new eco-material, that is promising to be used as filler in new sustainable composite materials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document