Regulative Function of a Subject with Personal Helplessness: a Theoretical Model of Research

Marina Klimova; Irina Ponomareva; Yana Sizova

doi:10.12973/ejac.2017.00277a

Regulative Function of a Subject with Personal Helplessness: a Theoretical Model of Research

Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry ◽

10.12973/ejac.2017.00277a ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 12 (7b) ◽

pp. 1491-1498

Author(s):

Marina Klimova ◽

Irina Ponomareva ◽

Yana Sizova

Keyword(s):

Theoretical Model ◽

Regulative Function

Download Full-text

A theoretical model for understanding dentists' behavior in treating patients with AIDS

Journal of Dental Education ◽

10.1002/j.0022-0337.1991.55.11.tb02589.x ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 55 (11) ◽

pp. 708-716 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

MS Chen

Keyword(s):

Theoretical Model

Download Full-text

A Model for Analyzing Suicide Prevention

Crisis ◽

10.1027//0227-5910.21.2.80 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 21 (2) ◽

pp. 80-89 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Maila Upanne

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Theoretical Model ◽

Protective Factors ◽

Suicide Prevention ◽

Suicide Risk ◽

Practical Work ◽

Individual Risk ◽

Self Assessment ◽

Prevention Project ◽

Individual Risk Factors

This study monitored the evolution of psychologists' (n = 31) conceptions of suicide prevention over the 9-year course of the National Suicide Prevention Project in Finland and assessed the feasibility of the theoretical model for analyzing suicide prevention developed in earlier studies [ Upanne, 1999a , b ]. The study was formulated as a retrospective self-assessment where participants compared their earlier descriptions of suicide prevention with their current views. The changes in conceptions were analyzed and interpreted using both the model and the explanations given by the subjects themselves. The analysis proved the model to be a useful framework for revealing the essential features of prevention. The results showed that the freely-formulated ideas on prevention were more comprehensive than those evolved in practical work. Compared to the earlier findings, the conceptions among the group had shifted toward emphasizing a curative approach and the significance of individual risk factors. In particular, greater priority was focused on the acute suicide risk phase as a preventive target. Nonetheless, the overall structure of prevention ideology remained comprehensive and multifactorial, stressing multistage influencing. Promotive aims (protective factors) also remained part of the prevention paradigm. Practical working experiences enhanced the psychologists' sense of the difficulties of suicide prevention as well as their criticism and feeling of powerlessness.

Download Full-text