scholarly journals Blood glucose-lowering therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-67
Author(s):  
Dilyse Nuttall
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy

Dynamics of cognitive disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under effect of metabolic therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 533-539
Author(s):  
Irina V. Gatckikh ◽  
M. M. Petrova ◽  
T. P. Shalda ◽  
E. L. Varygina ◽  
M. N. Kuznetsov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Sodium Chloride ◽  
Chloride Solution ◽  
Sodium Chloride Solution ◽  
Abstract Thinking ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy ◽  
Hypoglycemic Therapy

The aim of thisstudy was to investigatethe efficiency ofmetabolic therapyincorrectionof cognitive impairmentin patientswith type 2 diabetes. We undertook the analysis of results of the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in 80 patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. All patients received basic hypoglycemic therapy. 32 patients (study group) received in addition to the basal glucose lowering therapy daily intravenous infusion of 10 mlcytoflavindiluted in 200 ml of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution for 10 days, followed by 2 tablets b.i.d. for 25 days.The group of comparison consisted of 29 patients given in addition to the basal glucose-lowering therapy daily intravenous infusion of 24 ml (600 mg) thioctacid diluted in 200 mL of a 0.9% sodium chloride solution for 10 days. Thereafter, they received 1 tablet ofthioctacid BV once dailyfor 30 days. The control group consisted of 19 patients who received basic hypoglycemic therapy without additional metabolic therapy.Inclusion of cytoflavin in the combined treatment ofpatients with type 2 diabetes ensured a more effective correction of cognitive impairment. There was a statistically significant improvement in optical-spatial activities (p = 0.001), attention (p = 0.001), abstract thinking (p = 0.046), and memory (p<0.001) compared to those in other groups, according to the MOS test. Positive dynamics was expressed as the improvement of the optical-spatial activities by 9,8 ± 10,3%, attention by 13,5 ± 11,8%, abstract thinking by 7,0 ± 8,9%, and memory by 23.0 ± 14 6%. The study of variations of the serum level of brain neurotrophic factor (BDNF) over time during the treatment with metabolic preparations revealedits statistically significant increase (p = 0.002) in the patients treated with cytoflavincompared with comparison (p = 0.139) and control (p = 0.078) groups. These results suggest the influence of cytoflavinon the processes of neuroplasticity under conditions of hyperglycemia, improvement of cerebral microcirculation and cerebroprotective action of this medication.

scholarly journals Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of ipragliflozin in combination with metformin in comparison with other regimens of therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-63
Author(s):  
A. S. Kolbin ◽  
A. A. Kurylev ◽  
Yu. E. Balykina ◽  
M. A. Proskurin
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy

Ipragliflozin is a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that reduce plasma glucose concentrations by inhibiting glucose reabsorption by the kidney through inhibiting SGLT2 sodium-glucose cotransporter and induce glycosuria. SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of glucose lowering drugs most recently approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Unlike other antidiabetic agents, SGLT2 inhibitors improve glycemic control (by HbA1c) and provide multiple additional benefits, including decreased body weight, blood pressure, and other multiple pleiotropic effects. The completed clinical trials and real world data have provided evidence that including of SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of T2DM has benefits of reduction of cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Goal. The aim of the study was to conduct a clinical and economic examination of ipragliflozin in comparison with other regimens of glucose-lowering therapy with other SGLT2 inhibitors. Methods. In carrying out the pharmacoeconomic analysis itself, a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was applied with the calculation of the corresponding cost-effectiveness ratio (CER), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) according to the formula, as well as an a «budget impact analysis». Multiple one-way sensitivity analysis, check the robustness of the results of the main scenario results to changes in key parameters such as the cost of drugs and complications of diabetes. The time horizon for analyzing the dynamics of economic consequences when using ipragliflozin as a glucose-lowering therapy for T2DM was 5 years. Results. The weighted average cost per patient per year when using the ipragliflozin treatment strategy is 31,182 rubles. The costs of the empagliflozin strategy are 61,291 rubles per patient. In the case of using dapagliflozin, the weighted average costs are 30,032 rubles per patient per year, the total direct medical costs for the current drug therapy option, calculated on the initial number of target practice in 72,143 patients with type 2 diabetes, amounted to 3,068,642,442 rubles. Analysis of the trend of changes in weighted average costs showed that the broader use of ipragliflozin for the treatment of T2DM in the target population leads to reducing in diabetes related direct medical costs by 6.7 %, while the total economic effect of ipragliflozin introduction over five years will be 501,539,327 rubles. Conclusions. Use of ipragliflozin + metformin in T2DM treatment is a cost-effective strategy compared to empagliflozin + metformin. The combination of ipragliflozin with metformin versus dapagliflozin + metformin is economically feasible in terms of cost-effectiveness.

scholarly journals The management of type 2 diabetes before, during and after Covid-19 infection: what is the evidence?

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leszek Czupryniak ◽  
Dror Dicker ◽  
Roger Lehmann ◽  
Martin Prázný ◽  
Guntram Schernthaner
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
Clinical Inertia ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Antidiabetic Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy

AbstractPatients with Covid-19 place new challenges on the management of type 2 diabetes, including the questions of whether glucose-lowering therapy should be adjusted during infection and how to manage a return to normal care after resolution of Covid-19 symptoms. Due to the sudden onset of the pandemic, physicians have by necessity made such important clinical decisions in the absence of robust evidence or consistent guidelines. The risk to patients is compounded by the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in this population, which alongside diabetes is a major risk factor for severe disease and mortality in Covid-19. We convened as experts from the Central and Eastern European region to consider what advice we can provide in the setting of type 2 diabetes and Covid-19, considering the evidence before, during and after infection. We review recommendations that have been published to date, and consider the best available—but currently limited—evidence from large observational studies and the DARE-19 randomized control trial. Notably, we find a lack of guidance on restarting patients on optimal antidiabetic therapy after recovering from Covid-19, and suggest that this may provide an opportunity to optimize treatment and counter clinical inertia that predates the pandemic. Furthermore, we emphasize that optimization applies not only to glycaemic control, but other factors such as cardiorenal protection. While we look forward to the emergence of new evidence that we hope will address these gaps, in the interim we provide a perspective, based on our collective clinical experience, on how best to manage glucose-lowering therapy as patients with Covid-19 recover from their disease and return to normal care.

scholarly journals Eligibility of patients with type 2 diabetes for sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor cardiovascular outcomes trials: a global perspective from the DISCOVER study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Pintat ◽  
Peter Fenici ◽  
Niklas Hammar ◽  
Linong Ji ◽  
Kamlesh Khunti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy

ObjectiveTo assess the eligibility of patients participating in DISCOVER (a 3-year, prospective, observational study program of 15 992 patients with type 2 diabetes [T2D] initiating a second-line glucose-lowering therapy across 38 countries) for four cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study [CANVAS], Dapagliflozin effect on CardiovascuLAR Events trial [DECLARE-TIMI 58], EMPAgliflozin cardiovascular OUTCOME event trial [EMPA-REG OUTCOME], and eValuation of ERTugliflozin effIcacy and Safety CardioVascular outcomes trial [VERTIS-CV]).Research design and methodsIn this cross-sectional analysis, baseline characteristics of DISCOVER patients were compared with the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the CVOTs to assess patient eligibility, overall and in four regions (Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa).ResultsOverall, 11 385 patients (71.2%) had sufficient data for the analysis; 56.1% were men. The mean age and time since T2D diagnosis were 57.4 and 5.6 years, respectively. The mean glycated hemoglobin level was 8.3%. DISCOVER patients were younger, and fewer had a history of cardiovascular disease, than those enrolled in the CVOTs. Eligibility varied across the CVOTs; the proportion of eligible DISCOVER patients was highest for DECLARE-TIMI 58 (40.5%), followed by CANVAS (19.9%), VERTIS-CV (7.2%), and EMPA-REG OUTCOME (7.1%); 54.6% of patients were not eligible for any CVOT. Eligibility for each CVOT varied across regions, which was explained by the differing proportions of patients with established cardiovascular disease.ConclusionsIn a large, international population of patients with T2D initiating a second-line glucose-lowering therapy, DECLARE-TIMI 58 was the most inclusive CVOT, suggesting that its study population will be more representative of patients encountered in routine clinical practice than those of CANVAS, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, and VERTIS-CV.

scholarly journals Type 2 diabetes: evidence-based medicine approach to glucose-lowering therapy

2021 ◽  
pp. 160-168
Author(s):  
E. V. Biryukova ◽  
I. A. Morozova ◽  
S. V. Rodionova
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Clinical Inertia ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a serious medical and social problem. The danger of the disease is associated with epidemic growth rates and chronic complications, leading to early disability, decreased quality of life and mortality. The prevention of diabetes complications is based on the optimal glucose-lowering therapy with the achievement of target metabolic parameters from the date the diagnosis of T2DM was established and throughout the patient’s life. The complex pathogenetic mechanisms of T2DM are the underlying rationale for drug therapy with a simultaneous effect on various disorders, which will provide a greater hypoglycemic potential and maintain effective glycemic control as T2DM progresses. The main reasons for poor disease control include clinical inertia, untimely intensification of drug therapy, and the use of treatment regimens that are insufficiently effective given the progressive course of the disease. The therapy for T2DM is based on clinical guidelines. The pathogenetic therapy options associated with the use of vildagliptin and metformin are considered. Much attention in modern diabetology is paid to the study of the influence of various therapeutic approaches on the disease progression rates from the perspective of improving prognosis and long-term maintenance of target glycemic control. The advantages of combined glucose-lowering therapy at the onset of T2DM are considered in comparison with the stepwise intensification of glucose-lowering therapy. The VERIFY study examined the long-term efficacy and safety of two treatment approaches: early vildagliptin and metformin combination therapy versus the traditional stepwise approach starting with metformin as initial therapy. The combined glucose-lowering therapy is an important direction in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Sulfonylureas in today’s blood glucose lowering therapy.New data on advantages and potential barriers of an “old” antidiabetic group

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (13) ◽  
pp. 511-515
Author(s):  
Gábor Winkler
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Sulfonylurea Compounds ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Antidiabetic Treatment ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Glucose Lowering Therapy

Sulfonylurea compounds have been basic elements of antidiabetic treatment in type 2 diabetes for a long time. However, with the introduction of incretin type insulin secretagogues it is often arises, whether is still there a place for sulfonylureas in the today’s therapy. To answer this question the author overviews general pharmaceutical characteristics of the sulfonylurea compounds as well as individual particularities of the second generation derivatives used at present in Hungary. The author details also the most important differences between incretin type drugs − first of all dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors − and sulfonylureas. On the basis of available data it can be concluded in accordance with the latest international guidelines, that sulfonylureas have still role in the blood glucose lowering therapy of type 2 diabetes, though they became somewhat pushed back among insulin secretagogue type drugs. If a sulfonylurea compound is the drug of choice, it is important to select the appropriate molecule (in case of normal renal function gliclazide or glimepiride). It is also important to re-educate the patient, as well as to apply the minimal dose providing the desired glycaemic effect. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(13), 511–515.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document