Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Ceramic and Dentin

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Makdad Chakmakchi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Surface Treatment Effect on Shear Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Resin Cement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siripan Simasetha ◽  
Awiruth Klaisiri ◽  
Tool Sriamporn ◽  
Kraisorn Sappayatosok ◽  
Niyom Thamrongananskul
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ceramic Bond

Abstract Objective The study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDGC) and resin cement (RC) using different surface treatments. Materials and Methods LDGC blocks (Vintage LD Press) were prepared, etched with 4.5% hydrofluoric acid, and randomly divided into seven groups (n = 10), depending on the surface treatments. The groups were divided as follows: 1) no surface treatment (control), 2) Silane Primer (KS), 3) Signum Ceramic Bond I (SGI), 4) Signum Ceramic Bond I/Signum Ceramic Bond II (SGI/SGII), 5) experimental silane (EXP), 6) experimental silane/Signum Ceramic Bond II (EXP/SGII), and 7) Experimental/Adper Scotchbond Multi-purpose Adhesive (EXP/ADP). The specimens were cemented to resin composite blocks with resin cement and stored in water at 37 °C for 24 hours. The specimens underwent 5,000 thermal cycles and were subjected to the SBS test. Mode of failure was evaluated under the stereo microscope. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed with Welch ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results The highest mean SBS showed in group EXP/ADP (45.49 ± 3.37 MPa); however, this was not significantly different from group EXP/SGII (41.38 ± 2.17 MPa) (p ≥ 0.05). The lowest SBS was shown in the control group (18.36 ± 0.69 MPa). This was not significantly different from group KS (20.17 ± 1.10 MPa) (p ≥ 0.05). Conclusions The different surface treatments significantly affected the SBS value between LDGC and RC. The application of pure silane coupling agent with or without the application of an adhesive improved the SBS value and bond quality.

scholarly journals Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo ◽  
Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Diamond Bur ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of three surface treatments and two adhesive systems on the shear bond strength of old and freshly placed amalgam. The results suggested that the intact amalgam showed a significantly higher strength than repaired groups and the strongest repaired specimens were made when the amalgam surfaces were roughened with a diamond bur or microetcher. The adhesive systems showed no significant differences on bond strength with the same superficial texture.

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Treatments on the Color Change and Shear Bond Strength of Porcelain Laminate Veneer

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Passant Abdelhamid Hafez ◽  
mosaad Elgabarouny ◽  
latifa Abdelgawad ◽  
amr shebl
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Porcelain Laminate Veneer ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to Y-TZP ceramic

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Plínio Sciasci ◽  
Filipe Oliveira Abi-Rached ◽  
Gelson Luis Adabo ◽  
Paolo Baldissara ◽  
Renata Garcia Fonseca
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Effect Of Surface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document