Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for Correction of Myopia

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
Ahmed Tamer Sayed Saif
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Collamer Lens

scholarly journals Comparison of the visual performance of iris-fixated phakic lens and implantable collamer lens to correct high myopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-ling Jiao ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Zhe Yu ◽  
Ping-hui Wei ◽  
Hui Song
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Optical Quality ◽  
Visual Performance ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Modulation Transfer ◽  
Implantable Collamer Lens ◽  
Good Visual Acuity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 6

Abstract Background To compare visual performance between the iris-fixated phakic intraocular len (pIOL) and implantable collamer len (ICL) to correct high myopia. Methods Twenty-four eyes underwent iris-fixated pIOL implantation and 24 eyes underwent ICL implantation. At the 6-month follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) were compared between the iris-fixated pIOL and ICL groups. The objective scatter index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, and ocular aberrations were performed to evaluate postoperative visual quality between the two groups. Results No significant difference was found in UDVA, BCVA, and spherical equivalent between the iris-fixated pIOL and ICL groups (P > 0.05). Six months after surgery, the following values were significantly higher in the ICL group than in the iris-fixated pIOL group: MTF cutoff, strehl ratio and optical quality analysis system values at contrasts of 9 %, 20 %, and 100 % (P < 0.01). The OSI in the iris-fixated pIOL group was higher than in the ICL group 6 months after surgery (P < 0.01). All high-order aberrations were slightly more severe in the iris-fixated pIOL group than in the ICL group 6 months after surgery, although only trefoil (P = 0.023) differed significantly in this regard. Conclusions Both iris-fixated lenses and ICLs can provide good visual acuity. ICLs confer better visual performance in MTF-associated parameters and induce less intraocular light scattering than iris-fixated pIOLs.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Dry Eye after Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiting Chen ◽  
Xueyan Feng ◽  
Guangzeng Niu ◽  
Yuxiang Fan
Keyword(s):  
Dry Eye ◽  
Ocular Surface ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Meibomian Gland ◽  
Quality Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ocular Surface Disease Index ◽  
Implantable Collamer Lens ◽  
Lens Surgery ◽  
Breakup Time

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To evaluate dry eye (DE) and associated meibomian gland dysfunction parameters after Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a prospective observational case series. Patients who underwent ICL implantation without previous ocular diseases or ophthalmic treatments were enrolled. Their Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), noninvasive breakup time (NIBUT), meibography, slit-lamp examination of the lid margin, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and Schirmer test I were examined preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 117 eyes of 60 patients were enrolled, and 107 eyes completed 3-month follow-up period. OSDI, lid marginal abnormality, and meibomian gland (MG) secretion, and meibum quality score were significantly higher at 1 month postoperatively and recovered partially at 3 months after surgeries, while NIBUT was significantly decreased all the time. Patients with previous DE symptoms (OSDI score ≥12) showed not only lower Schirmer and TBUT values but also higher CFS, lid margin score, MG loss, MG secretion, and meibum quality scores compared with those in the control group after operations. Low Schirmer, NIBUT values, and high meibum quality score were determined as risk factors for DE symptoms after ICL surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ICL implantation has a bad influence on the ocular surface and MG functions. The influence may be more obvious in patients with existing DE.

Fluctuaciones de presión intraocular en pacientes operados con implante de implantable collamer lens (ICL V4c). Seguimiento a 3 meses

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (8) ◽  
pp. 367-376
Author(s):  
J. Navarrete Argüello ◽  
H. Bello López Portillo ◽  
M.A. Cantero Vergara ◽  
G.A. Sierra Acevedo ◽  
K. Ruíz Salgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Collamer Lens ◽  
Icl V4c

scholarly journals Implantable Collamer Lens Versus Iris-Fixed Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation to Correct Myopia: A Meta-Analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e104649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guan-Lu Liang ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Jun-Ting Shi ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Feng-Ying He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Phakic Intraocular Lens ◽  
Implantable Collamer Lens ◽  
Lens Implantation

scholarly journals Buffering zone of implantable Collamer lens sizing in V4c

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Wan Nam ◽  
Dong Hui Lim ◽  
Joo Hyun ◽  
Eui-Sang Chung ◽  
Tae-Young Chung
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Collamer Lens

Corneal Endothelial Changes After ICL (Implantable Collamer Lens) Insertion

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 189
Author(s):  
Yang Kyeung Cho ◽  
Hyun Soo Lee ◽  
Man Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Collamer Lens
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document