A Survey on the Relationship between Institutional Ownership with Conservatism , Forecast Earning Error and Earning Forecast Ability

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 177-190
Author(s):  
Hasan Shabihi ◽  
Naghi Fazeli ◽  
Khosrow Faghani Makerani
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Earning Forecast ◽  
The Relationship

Board of Director Characteristics, Institutional Ownership, and Fraud: Evidence from Australia

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vineeta D. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Research Evidence ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Board Of Director ◽  
Composition And Structure ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Director Characteristics ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The U.S

Due to the high incidence of fraud in Australia, regulatory reports suggest strengthening the monitoring role of the board of directors (BOD). These reports recommend greater independence and no duality (chairperson of the BOD should not be the CEO) on the BOD. While there is no Australian evidence, research evidence in the U.S. supports these suggested reforms. It is not clear whether the research evidence observed in the U.S. will generalize to the Australian setting because of contextual differences. This study extends the U.S. findings to the Australian context and investigates the relationship between two attributes of the BOD, independence and duality, and fraud. In addition, I examine whether institutional ownership plays a role in the context of fraud. The more highly concentrated institutional ownership in Australia suggests the presence of some relationship. Using a matched sample of fraud and no-fraud firms from 1988–2000, I find that as the percentage of independent directors and the percentage of independent institutional ownership increases, the likelihood of fraud decreases. As expected, the results show a positive relationship between duality and the likelihood of fraud. These results support the call for strengthening the composition and structure of the BOD in Australia.

Investigating the Relationship Between Ownership Structure and Investment Efficiency in Emerging Markets: Evidence From the Egyptian Stock Market

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sayed Rashed ◽  
Ebitihj Mostafa Abd ◽  
Esraa Fathi Mohamed Ismail ◽  
Doaa Mohamed Abd El Samea
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Panel Data Analysis ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Investment Efficiency ◽  
Outside Director ◽  
Director Ownership ◽  
The Relationship

This paper aims to examine the relationship between Ownership Structure Mechanisms (Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Block holder Ownership and Outside Director Ownership) and Investment Efficiency by using panel data analysis. To investigate this relationship used the multiple regression models. Findings of investigation of 35 firms listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange in the period 2006 to 2015 by balanced Panel model representative. Results indicated that Managerial Ownership isn’t related with investment efficiency. In contract, institutional ownership, block holder ownership and outside director ownership have a negative relationship with investment efficiency. In addition, the researcher found that control variables (Firm size, Debt ratio, Tobin’s Q) not related to investment efficiency. These findings imply that the Majority of Egyptians firms relies on institutional without individual ownership and then reduces much of possible from agency problems and decreasing information asymmetry and facilitating the monitoring of investment decisions.

scholarly journals Study of the effect of institutional ownership on accounting quality and cost of capital

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (SPE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Fallah
Keyword(s):  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Accounting Information ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Accounting Quality ◽  
Quality Of Accounting Information ◽  
The Relationship

The test results of the research hypotheses showed that there is a significant relationship between institutional ownership and quality of accounting information and cost of capital debt, but institutional ownership has not been able to moderate the relationship between quality of accounting information and cost of capital debt.

scholarly journals The Influence of KAP Size, Institutional Ownership, and Audit Committee on The Quality of Financial Statements

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Adris Kuncoro ◽  
Dhini Suryandari
Keyword(s):  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Descriptive Statistical Analysis

This research aims to examine the relationship between KAP size, institutional ownership, and the audit committee on the quality of financial reports. 616 Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) companies in 2018 became the population in this study. Purposive sampling as a sampling technique resulted in 547companies. Using inferential logistic regression analysis and using descriptive statistical analysis hypothesis testing methods with IBM SPSS version 25 tools. This study found that the KAP size and the audit committee has a positive effect on the quality of financial reports. Institutional ownership does not affect the quality of financial reports. Simultaneously, KAP size, institutional ownership, and audit committee influence the quality of financial reports. This study concludes that partially, KAP size and audit committee has a positive effect on the quality of financial reports. Simultaneously, KAP size, institutional ownership, and audit committee affect the quality of financial reports. Further research suggests using other proxies, other periods, and other variables.

Stock liquidity and stock return: an asymmetric impact of institutional ownership approach

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Ali Daryaei ◽  
Yasin Fattahi
Keyword(s):  
Stock Return ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Stock Liquidity ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Asymmetric Impact ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Total Market

Purpose This study is primarily aimed at investigating the asymmetric impact of institutional ownership on the relationship between stock liquidity and stock return. It was conducted by testing the hypotheses regarding efficient monitoring and adverse selection from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Design/methodology/approach Using a panel smooth transition regression model and selecting 183 firms for the period from 2009 to 2019 from TSE, this study examined the data to explore the asymmetric impact of institutional ownership on the relationship between stock liquidity and stock return. Findings The results show a positive impact by institutional ownership on the relationship between stock liquidity and stock return in the first regime (threshold level 39%), whereas in the second regime, there is a negative impact by institutional ownership on the relationship between stock liquidity and stock return. Furthermore, the firms were divided into two groups based on the market value. The first group includes those with a market share less than the mean total market value of the sample. The second group includes firms with a market share higher than the mean total market value of the sample (large firms). The results illustrate that the threshold level is 32% and 44% for the first and second groups, respectively. Originality/value The findings of this study suggest that institutional ownership theories require closer inquiry.

The Effect of Company Size on the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance in the Iraqi Stock Exchange

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghazwan Al-Shiblawi ◽  
Dalal Mahdi ◽  
Mohammed Mahdi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Statistical Population ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
The Relationship

The aim of the present study is to assess The Effect of Company Size on the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance in the Iraqi Stock Exchange. The statistical population under study is listed companies of  Iraq Stock Exchange and the number of companies studied in Iraq is 35, from 2015-2019. The results concluded that there is a statistically significant relationship between the change (increase) of institutional ownership and the performance of the company, and this relationship is direct, as well as the relationship between the change (increase) of institutional ownership and the performance of the company. It can change under the influence of the company's size, and this relationship is negative, meaning the larger the company's size, the weaker the relationship. At the same time, the existence of a relationship between changing the composition of the members of the Board of Directors and the performance of the company was not supported, as well as between changing (increasing) the independence of the Board of Directors and the performance of the company, in addition to the relationship between changing the composition of the Board of Directors. The independence of the Board of Directors and the performance of the company is not affected by the change in the size of the company

Ownership structure and audit quality: the mediating effect of board independence

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moncef Guizani ◽  
Gaafar Abdalkrim
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Government Ownership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
New Perspective ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose This study aims to examine the mediating effect of board independence on the relationship between ownership structure and audit quality. Design/methodology/approach The research uses generalized methods of moments regression to test the relationship between ownership structure and audit quality. The sample consists of 162 non-financial firms listed on the Gulf Cooperation Council stock markets between the years of 2009 and 2016. To test the significance of the mediating effect, this paper uses the Sobel test. Findings Empirical findings show that companies with higher family ownership are less likely to demand extensive audit services and, as a result, pay lower audit fees. Conversely, this study finds that companies with higher active and passive institutional ownership are more likely to engage high-quality auditors and pay larger audit fees. As for government ownership, it has no significant impact on audit fees. The results also reveal that the negative (positive) effect of family (institutional) ownership on audit quality follows the path through reducing (enhancing) board independence. Further tests are conducted and support the main findings. Practical implications This study has important implications for policymakers and regulators to address the conflict between controlling shareholders and minorities by promoting higher standards of audit quality. The study findings may be useful to investors, assisting them in making better-informed decisions and aids other interested parties in gaining a better understanding of the role played by ownership structure in audit quality. The study also contributes to the strategic board behavior by bringing a new perspective on how boards engage in monitoring by requesting external audit services. This behavior is likely to be influenced by the type of controlling shareholder. Originality/value The main contribution of the present paper is to examine the board composition as a potential mediating variable between ownership structure and audit quality. Moreover, it highlights the issue of improving governance mechanisms.

Corporate governance and turnaround: Evidence from Australia

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-578
Author(s):  
Seema Miglani ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Darren Henry
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Outside Directors ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Corporate Turnaround ◽  
Outside Director ◽  
Director Ownership ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Matched Samples

We examine the relationship between ownership and outside director attributes and corporate turnaround outcomes using matched samples of 99 turnaround and 99 non-turnaround listed Australian firms during the 2004–2015 period. Based on agency theory principles, we propose that key shareholder groups (block ownership, director ownership, institutional ownership) and outside directors are related to firm-level turnaround outcomes, and particularly changes in these attributes across decline to turnaround periods. Our results provide evidence that turnaround and non-turnaround firms differ in terms of their ownership and board composition structures, and that changes in director ownership and the degree of board independence are important in determining the likelihood of turnaround success. JEL Classification: G33, G34, M40

scholarly journals The Relationship between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Going Concern Evaluation: Evidence from Firms Listed on Amman Stock Exchange

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Bilal Nayef Zureigat ◽  
Faudziah Hanim Fadzil ◽  
Syed Soffian Syed Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Meeting ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Going Concern ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to examine the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms (representative by each of managerial, institutional ownership, board independence and board meeting) and going concern evaluation among Jordanian listed firms. Through using multiple regression analysis, the results of this study illustrates that there is a positive relationship between managerial ownership, board independence and board meeting and going-concern evaluation, while a negative relationship is found with institutional ownership. There are four main hypotheses, two of them which are managerial and institutional ownership are accepted, while board independence and board meeting are not supported. This study shed more light on the importance of complying with the requirements of governance code and instructions by the companies and the need to impose fines or sanctions on non-compliant companies. The results of this study contribute to the creditors’ interest to be more alert to companies which may possess characteristics that contribute in manipulation of future companies.

Accounting irregularities and failure to deliver

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 770-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi E. Boyd ◽  
Ann Marie Hibbert ◽  
Ivelina Pavlova
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Short Selling ◽  
Accounting Restatements ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Short Sellers ◽  
Naked Short Selling ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between naked short selling and accounting irregularities that cause a firm to issue a restatement. Design/methodology/approach – Using the level of abnormal fails-to-deliver as a proxy for naked short selling, the paper looks for evidence of increased naked short selling in anticipation of, as well as in response to these announcements. Findings – Larger firms and firms with a higher percentage of institutional ownership experience greater levels of fails prior to the announcement day, while smaller firms are more likely to be targets of naked short sellers after the announcement. The paper also finds that more transparent announcements are associated with more abnormal fails. Originality/value – This paper is the first research to study the relation between naked short selling and accounting restatements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document