Aging Effect of Different Types of Composite Resin Restoration on Shear Bond Strength to Different Orthodontic Adhesives with Sapphire Bracket : In Vitro Comparative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-149
Author(s):  
Linda B. Jabbar ◽  
Fakhri A. Ali
Author(s):  
Hoseinali Mahgoli ◽  
Mahnaz Arshad ◽  
Kamran Rasouli ◽  
Ali Akbar Sobati ◽  
Ahmad Reza Shamshiri

  Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effect of application of two types of zirconia primers on repair bond strength of composite to zirconia ceramic. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro, experimental study, 60 zirconia blocks were divided into five groups and subjected to the application of Z-Prime Plus (ZPP), Monobond Plus (MBP), Porcelain Bonding Resin (PBR), ZPP followed by PBR (ZPP+PBR) and MBP followed by PBR (MBP+PBR). They were then bonded to Z100 composite. The samples were then immersed in water at 37°C for 24 hours, thermocycled for 1000 cycles between 5-55°C and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test. The mode of failure was determined under a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: The mean bond strength was the highest in ZPP+PBR group followed by MBP+PBR, ZPP, PBR and MBP group (22.29±8.86, 15.75±2.81, 12.02±3.24, 3.60±2.92 and 2.92±1.78 MPa, respectively). The effects of type of zirconia primer and use/no use of PBR on SBS were significant (P<0.05). The frequency of adhesive failure in MBP and PBR groups was significantly higher than that in MBP+PBR and ZPP+PBR groups (P<0.05). The cohesive failure was significantly more frequent in ZPP+PBR group than in ZPP, MBP and PBR groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Simultaneous application of zirconia primer and PBR is the most efficient technique for repair of all-ceramic zirconia restorations with composite resin.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 515 ◽  
Author(s):  
KrantiKiran Reddy Ealla ◽  
AshokBabu Devatha ◽  
MNarasimha Lakshmi ◽  
NareshB Kumar ◽  
Srikanth Erukala ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney G. Northrup ◽  
David W. Berzins ◽  
Thomas Gerard Bradley ◽  
William Schuckit

Abstract Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blūgloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 40 ± 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring. Results: The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P &lt; .001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P &gt; .05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P &gt; .05) in ARI scores among all three groups. Conclusions: All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Meghna Singh ◽  
Neerja Singh ◽  
Ashish Saini ◽  
Pranav Singh ◽  
Tanu Tewari ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 263-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Willems ◽  
C.E.L. Carels ◽  
G. Verbeke

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
KommineniHarika Chowdary ◽  
Bolla Nagesh ◽  
PraveenKumar Gali ◽  
Tammineedi Sravanthi ◽  
LakshmiBhavani Potru ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document