Immediate Implant Placement and Temporization in the Aesthetic Zone in the Presence of Horizontal and Vertical Bone Defect : A Case Report

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Meouchy Badry ◽  
Choueiry Chady ◽  
Mouchref Hamasni Fatme ◽  
Rifai Mohammad
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Edith Groenendijk ◽  
Edith Groenendijk ◽  
Gert Jacobus Meijer

Background: Immediate implant placement and provisionalization (IIPP) is considered as a high-risk treatment for aesthetic failure and generally only recommended in case of post-extraction intact sockets and a thick phenotype gingiva. During a prospective clinical cohort study on one-hundred consecutive patients, using this strict flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) protocol, we found high and stable aesthetic outcomes (WES/PES = 8.2/12.1) in both intact – and defect sockets, and both thin- as thick gingival phenotype. By means of one case report (Case 1), the total FIIPP treatment is illustrated. Results of two other cases, show that comparable high aesthetic outcomes can be reached in cases with a thin phenotype gingiva or buccal bone defect using the same protocol. Case Presentation: In a 24-year-old male with good general and oral health, root fracture of tooth 21 was diagnosed and FIIPP was indicated. Direct post-extraction, an implant was placed in a palatal position of an intact socket by a flapless approach. A minimum space of 2 mm in front of the implant was created and filled with a bone-substitute prior to implant placement. Subsequently, the implant was restored by use of a titanium abutment and a composite temporary crown. Three months later, the temporary crown was replaced by a customized zirconium abutment and ceramic crown resulting in a high aesthetic outcome. A comparable aesthetic outcome using this protocol can be reached in cases with a thin phenotype gingiva and/or a buccal bone defect (Case 2). Conclusion: Using described surgical FIIPP protocol, high aesthetic outcomes are reached in only 4 visits and within a treatment period of 4 months. A thin phenotype gingiva, or a pre-operative buccal bone defect, does not seem to affect the aesthetic outcome using this treatment method.


Author(s):  
Hélder Moura

Purposes: After tooth extraction alveolar socket bone undergoes a remodelling process. The horizontal and the vertical bone losses complicate dental rehabilitation with implants. Socket-Shield technique maintain the periodontal attachment including cementum, periodontal ligament and bundle bone. In this report this technique was indicated to replace the lost teeth. Case report: A socket shield technique was used for immediate implant placement on a non-restorable teeth by failure of crowns in teeth 12, 11 and 21. Through a osteotomy and manipulation of soft tissues with provisionals it was possible to correct the gingival contours and zeniths. Conclusions: Atraumatic extraction and socket preservation technique decreases the alveolar bone resorption by maintaining the hard and the soft tissue volume. Provisionalization allows management of the soft tissues around the implants. This treatment offers a predictable aesthetic and functional result .


2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugo Covani ◽  
Simone Marconcini ◽  
Roberto Crespi ◽  
Antonio Barone

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical success of an implant placed immediately after the explantation of a fractured blade implant. A healthy 58-year-old male nonsmoker presented with a fractured blade implant that had been subjected to biomechanical overload. A new blade implant was placed immediately after the removal of the fractured one. The new implant was placed with a composite graft of collagen gel and corticocancellous porcine bone and covered with a bioabsorbable membrane. Radiographic evaluation at 6 months postoperation showed complete bone healing. No residual bone defect was observed or probed during the uncovering phase; moreover, no mobility, pain, suppuration, or presence of peri-implant radiolucency were observed at the second-stage surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Sergio Charifker Ribeiro Martins ◽  
Leandro Lecio de Lima Souza ◽  
Karen Christina Soares Tenório ◽  
José Ricardo Mariano ◽  
Ricardo Alberto Heine

Author(s):  
Fahad Umer ◽  
Saqib Habib

Traumatic oral injuries present their own unique restorative challenges to the clinician due to their variable clinical presentation. In such cases, achieving optimum aesthetics and function in the maxillary aesthetic zone is challenging. This case report describes the rehabilitation of a patient with immediate implant placement after suffering trauma to the oral cavity resulting in a complete loss (avulsion) of a permanent central incisor tooth. In order to preserve the existing soft and hard tissue and to achieve predictable and aesthetically pleasing results, we decided to place an immediate implant as opposed to replantation of the avulsed tooth. Flapless implant surgery was planned and a dental implant (Bio horizons Implant Systems, Inc.) was placed following non-submerged protocol. At six month’s follow-up, the clinical and radiographic examination revealed a well osseo-integrated implant with an intact buccal cortical plate. Continuous...


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio José Rodrigues Barcelos ◽  
Arthur Belém Novaes Júnior ◽  
Marcio Baltazar Conz ◽  
Nassin David Harari ◽  
Guaracilei Maciel Vidigal Júnior

This article addresses diagnostic parameters that should be assessed in the treatment of extraction sockets with dental implant placement by presenting three case reports that emphasize the relevance of the amount of remaining bone walls. Diagnosis was based on the analysis of clinical and radiographic parameters (e.g.: bone defect morphology, remaining bone volume, presence of infections on the receptor site). Case 1 presents a 5-wall defect in the maxillary right central incisor region with severe root resorption, which was treated with immediate implant placement. Cases 2 and 3 present, respectively, two- and three-wall bone defects that did not have indication for immediate implants. These cases were first submitted to a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure with bone graft biomaterial and membrane barriers, and the implants were installed in a second surgical procedure. The analysis of the preoperative periodontal condition of the adjacent teeth and bone defect morphology is extremely important because these factors determine the choice between immediate implant or GBR treatment followed by implant installation in a subsequent intervention.


Author(s):  
Amit Khunger

A dental implant is the most accepted treatment option to replace the badly decayed tooth or missing tooth. The jumping gap left after the placement of the implant in the socket will require augmentation of bone graft material. In this case report, the extracted root stumps are used as an autogenous tooth graft material after its preparation. And PRF is mixed with graft material for additive advantage. So, the present case report discusses the feasibility of the use of autogenous tooth graft material along with PRF for the better osseointegration of the implant.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 745-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Van Nimwegen ◽  
R. J. Goené ◽  
A. C. L. Van Daelen ◽  
K. Stellingsma ◽  
G. M. Raghoebar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document