scholarly journals Multimodal Pain Management With Adductor Canal Block Decreases Opioid Consumption Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Thomas Soehnlen
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Adductor Canal Block ◽  
Multimodal Pain Management ◽  
Adductor Canal ◽  
Total Knee

Does the addition of iPACK to adductor canal block in the presence or absence of periarticular local anesthetic infiltration improve analgesic and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. rapm-2021-102705
Author(s):  
Nasir Hussain ◽  
Richard Brull ◽  
Brendan Sheehy ◽  
Michael Dasu ◽  
Tristan Weaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Functional Recovery ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Adductor Canal Block ◽  
Adductor Canal ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Local Anesthetic Infiltration

BackgroundWhen combined with adductor canal block (ACB), local anesthetic infiltration between popliteal artery and capsule of knee (iPACK) is purported to improve pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the analgesic benefits of adding iPACK to ACB in the setting of surgeon-administered periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) are unclear.ObjectivesTo evaluate the analgesic benefits of adding iPACK to ACB, compared with ACB alone, in the setting of LIA following TKA.Evidence reviewWe conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the effects of adding iPACK block to ACB versus ACB alone on pain severity at 6 hours postoperatively in adult patients undergoing TKA. We a priori planned to stratify analysis for use of LIA. Opioid consumption at 24 hours, functional recovery, and iPACK-related complications were secondary outcomes.FindingsFourteen trials (1044 patients) were analyzed. For the primary outcome comparison in the presence of LIA (four trials, 273 patients), adding iPACK to ACB did not improve postoperative pain at 6 hours. However, in the absence of LIA (eight trials, 631 patients), adding iPACK to ACB reduced pain by a weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% CI) of −1.33 cm (−1.57 to –1.09) (p<0.00001). For the secondary outcome comparisons in the presence of LIA, adding iPACK to ACB did not improve postoperative pain at all other time points, opioid consumption or functional recovery. In contrast, in the absence of LIA, adding iPACK to ACB reduced pain at 12 hours, and 24 hours by a WMD (95% CI) of −0.98 (−1.79 to –0.17) (p=0.02) and −0.69 (−1.18 to –0.20) (p=0.006), respectively, when compared with ACB alone, but did not reduce opioid consumption. Functional recovery was also improved by a log(odds ratio) (95% CI) of 1.28 (0.45 to 2.11) (p=0.003). No iPACK-related complications were reported.ConclusionAdding iPACK to ACB in the setting of periarticular LIA does not improve analgesic outcomes following TKA. In the absence of LIA, adding iPACK to ACB reduces pain up to 24 hours and enhances functional recovery. Our findings do not support the addition of iPACK to ACB when LIA is routinely administered.

Does the Addition of iPACK Block to Adductor Canal Block Provide Improved Analgesic Effect in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jou-Hua Wang ◽  
Hsuan-Hsiao Ma ◽  
Te-Feng Arthur Chou ◽  
Shang-Wen Tsai ◽  
Cheng-Fong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Adductor Canal Block ◽  
Adductor Canal ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Posterior Knee

AbstractThe interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule of posterior knee (iPACK) block was proposed in recent years to relieve posterior knee pain. Since adductor canal block (ACB) and iPACK involve different branches of the sensory nerves, it is theoretically feasible to combine iPACK block and ACB to relief pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aim to validate the efficacy of adding iPACK block to ACB in the setting of a multimodal pain management protocol following TKA. A comprehensive literature review on Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed was performed. Eight studies (N = 1,056) that compared the efficacy of iPACK block + ACB with ACB alone were included. Primary outcomes consisted of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at rest or during activity at various time points. Secondary outcomes include opioids consumption, walking distance, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Compared to ACB alone, VAS scores at rest (standardized mean difference [SMD]: –1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –2.05 to –0.30) and during activity (SMD: –0.26; 95% CI: –0.49 to –0.03) on the day of surgery were lower in the iPACK block + ACB group. However, the difference did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Opioids consumption at postoperative 24 hours was lower in the iPACK + ACB group (SMD: –0.295; 95% CI: –0.543 to –0.048). VAS score on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2, opioids consumption from 24 to 48 hours, walking distance, and LOS were not different. In conclusion, the addition of iPACK block to ACB in a multimodal pain management protocol can effectively reduce opioids consumption in the early postoperative period. This is a level III, meta-analysis study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document