scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q) in a sample of individuals with schizophrenia from Poland

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Justyna Kasznia ◽  
Bartłomiej Stańczykiewicz ◽  
Aleksandra Pytel ◽  
Krzysztof Szczygieł ◽  
Błażej Misiak
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Childhood Experience ◽  
Experience Of Care

scholarly journals The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 1663
Author(s):  
Peymaneh Shirinbayan ◽  
Mahyar Salavati ◽  
Farin Soleimani ◽  
Ahmad Saeedi ◽  
Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Maternal Behavior ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Childhood Experience ◽  
Paternal Behavior ◽  
Persian Version ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
Father’S Role ◽  
Behavior Scale

Background: The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q), a tool based on a retrospective interview with the child. Materials and Methods: To this aim, 251 adolescents from four regions of Tehran megacity completed the questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was examined, along with the face and content validity. In addition, the construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: EFA and CFA supported a 4-factor solution including mother’s role scale items, father’s role scale items, maternal behavior scale items, and paternal behavior scale items.  The total variance extracted in EFA ranged from 33.9 to 60.7. The internal consistency for mother’s role, father’s role, maternal behavior, and paternal behavior was 0.61, 0.65, 0.86, and 0.9 respectively. Thus, the questionnaire had a suitable fit, as well as reasonable reliability and validity. Conclusion:  The Persian version of the CECA.Q had adequate reliability and validity as a self-report measurement for childhood experience of care and abuse. [GMJ.2020;9:e1663]

Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q)

2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Smith ◽  
D. Lam ◽  
A. Bifulco ◽  
S. Checkley
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Experience ◽  
Experience Of Care

Child-specific and family-wide risk factors using the retrospective Childhood Experience of Care & Abuse (CECA) instrument: A life-course study of adult chronic depression — 3

2007 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
George W. Brown ◽  
Tom K.J. Craig ◽  
Tirril O. Harris ◽  
Rachel V. Handley ◽  
Anna L. Harvey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Life Course ◽  
Chronic Depression ◽  
Childhood Experience ◽  
Experience Of Care

The childhood experience of care and abuse questionnaire (CECA.Q): Validation in a community series

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bifulco ◽  
O. Bernazzani ◽  
P. M. Moran ◽  
C. Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Experience ◽  
Experience Of Care

Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bifulco ◽  
O. Bernazzani ◽  
P. M. Moran ◽  
C. Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Childhood Experience ◽  
Experience Of Care

scholarly journals Instrumentos mais utilizados na avaliação da exposição a Experiências Adversas na Infância: uma revisão da literatura

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (129) ◽  
pp. 501-513
Author(s):  
Flávia Garcia Pereira ◽  
Maria Carmen Viana
Keyword(s):  
Child Abuse ◽  
Childhood Trauma ◽  
Adverse Childhood Experiences ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Childhood Experience ◽  
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire ◽  
Childhood Experiences ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
Adverse Childhood ◽  
Early Trauma

RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar e descrever os instrumentos mais frequentemente utilizados nas pesquisas epidemiológicas para a avaliação das Experiências Adversas na Infância, nos últimos dez anos. Trata-se de uma revisão da literatura, cujos critérios de inclusão foram artigos disponíveis na íntegra, nos idiomas inglês, espanhol e português, publicados e indexados nas bases de dados Medline e Lilacs, que citassem no resumo os instrumentos de avaliação utilizados nos estudos. Foram analisados 6 dos 38 instrumentos identificados nos 253 artigos selecionados para análise. Os instrumentos mais citados foram: 1) Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, 2) Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse, 3) Adverse Childhood Experiences Questionnaire, 4) Child Abuse and Trauma Scale, 5) Early Trauma Inventory Self Report e 6) Adverse Childhood Experiences International Questionnaire. Os instrumentos descritos diferiram quanto às propriedades psicométricas, à idade para aplicação e à quantidade de Experiências Adversas na Infância avaliadas. Predominaram estudos publicados em periódicos internacionais na língua inglesa. Três instrumentos apresentam versão em português vigente no Brasil, sendo que um deles considera somente a avaliação de aspectos específicos de Experiências Adversas na Infância, enquanto que os outros dois avaliam, também, outras experiências traumáticas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document