Tendencies of Development of Legal Regulation Emission and Turnover Bonds in the Legislation of Poland

10.12737/397 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Андрей Богустов ◽  
Andrei Bogustov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Securities Market ◽  
Concept Definition ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Debt Holders

The subject of research is the notion and the features of a bond as a subject of the Polish civil law. The aim of research is the exposure of the current trends of legal regulation of bond issue and handling on example of the legislation of Poland. The methodological basis of the research contains the comparative law approach. In the course of investigation the author has come to the conclusion that the legislation of Poland governing the issue and handling of bonds reflects a number of current trends of the development of civil law as following: the differentiation of legal regulation of the securities market, the unacceptance of the universal concept definition of the term «security», the dematerialization of the securities, the approximation of the legal status of a share and a bond, the enhancement of the measures of the corporation’s shareholders and debt holders protection, the approximation and mutual loanword of the common and continental law countries legislation, the extention of the frame of reference of legal civil rights represented with securities.

scholarly journals ECONOMIC NATURE AND LEGAL STATUS OF CRYPTOCURRENCY

2020 ◽  
pp. 3-13
Author(s):  
Ирина Александровна Астраханцева ◽  
Роман Геннадьевич Астраханцев
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Virtual Currency ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Digital Version ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Tangible Asset

The article focuses on the relevance of establishing legal norms for virtual currency, which is currently working in the gray zone. The article substantiates why cryptocurrency was referred to other property in the framework of civil law. The issues of referring cryptocurrency to such objects of civil rights as monetary funds, currency values, securities, intellectual property, intangible assets, etc. are considered in detail. Based on a comprehensive analysis, the classification of cryptocurrency as a different property within the framework of civil law is substantiated. The author's definition of cryptocurrency is given as a cryptographically protected property with signs of cryptographic authentication, decentralization, management through consensus, and the use of distributed ledgers. The economic essence and legal status of the cryptocurrency proposed by the authors emphasize the exclusively digital version of the existence and use of this object, indicates the possibility of the turnover of this asset, delimits the concept of cryptocurrency, non-cash and electronic money. The definition of a crypto asset as property makes it possible to develop tax legislation, since the implementation of cryptocurrency is close to investment instruments, which makes it possible to clarify the issue of paying such a tax as VAT. Cryptocurrency as property describes not the thing itself, but the legal relations associated with it, that is, those rights that, according to the rules of law, can be exercised. The article also raises one of the main issues that must be resolved - this is the recognition of ownership of this specific type of property. According to the authors, the starting point for determining the ownership of the cryptocurrency should be that the subject of the right will be the owner of this asset if he legally gained access to the private key by analogy as the subject acquired the ownership of a tangible asset on a legal basis.

The Legal Status of Cryptocurrencies in the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Sidorenko
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Virtual Currency ◽  
Content Analysis Method ◽  
Crypto Currency ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Definition Of

The paper focuses on the definition of the legal status of the cryptocurrency in the framework of the current Russian legislation. The subject of the research is the principal scientific and practical approaches to determining the object of civil rights and the object of acquisitive crimes in terms of their adaptability to cryptocurrencies. The purposes of the work were the search for a universal algorithm for resolving civil disputes related to the turnover of the crypto currency, and the qualification of the virtual currency theft (fraud). By using historical, comparative legal and dialectical methods as well as the content analysis method parallels between cryptocurrencies and individual objects of civil rights (a thing, property rights, other property) were drawn, and a number of options for qualifying the actions related to the non-repayable withdrawal of the cryptocurrency were proposed. Finally, the paper analyzes the draft laws prepared by the RF Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and presents the author’s vision of the prospects for legalizing the cryptocurrency as an object of civil rights.

Features of the legal status of subjects of Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Iryna I. Banasevych ◽  
Ruslana M. Heints ◽  
Mariia V. Lohvinova ◽  
Oksana S. Oliinyk
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Entities

Theoretical and applied research of the features of the legal status of the subjects of civil law remains debatable today. Doctrinal and legislative analysis of this subject points to unresolved issues in this area. In particular, the provision on defining the state as a party to civil law remains controversial. There is no consensus on the definition of individuals and legal entities as subjects of civil law among scholars. Furthermore, the legal regulation of certain types of entities is somewhat unsystematic and chaotic. This is largely due to the insufficient development of theoretical issues related to the subjects of civil law. The above issues determine the relevance of the study of the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law. The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law based on doctrinal and legislative analysis. The study is based on a systematic approach, which lies in studying a complex system of relationships between subjects of civil law. Furthermore, the study is based on the laws and principles of dialectics, which contribute to the study of the legal status of the subjects of civil law. Systemic and structural-functional analysis was used to comprehensively describe the legal status of subjects of civil law. The historical method contributed to the study of the evolution of research on the subjects of civil law. The formal legal method helped identify the special features of the provisions of regulations concerning the subjects of civil law. With the help of the comparative legal method, the study analysed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine in terms of regulation of subjects of civil law and such regulation was compared with other countries. The study defined the concepts and types of subjects of civil law and considered the features of the legal status of individuals, legal entities, as well as the state as a special participant of civil law. Special attention was paid to the historical analysis of the development of approaches to the definition of subjects of law, starting with Roman law

scholarly journals Legal status of cryptocurrency in Asian countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 96-102
Author(s):  
V.M. Logoida
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Liberal Approach ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Almost All

The article is devoted to the study of the experience of legal regulation of the legal status of cryptocurrencies and transactions with them in Asian countries (except for the People's Republic of China and Asian countries - members of the Commonwealth of Independent States, as the author examined them in separate publications). In the article the author, based on the study of regulations, administrative and judicial practice of all major countries in this part of the world, emphasizes the divergent trends in cryptocurrency transactions regulation in the region, when some countries move from a liberal approach to the use of cryptocurrencies to their total ban and vice versa. It is noted that almost all countries in the region give a legal assessment of the payment function of cryptocurrencies, using regulatory or prohibitive approaches, depending on the chosen policy, which indirectly confirms their understanding of the legal nature of cryptocurrencies primarily as a means of payment. At the same time, these countries not only categorically distinguish cryptocurrencies from fiat money issued by central banks, but also mostly avoid the official definition of cryptocurrency as private (decentralized) cash, preferring to qualify them as an intangible asset, virtual asset, digital asset, financial value and even a good or service, which is currently a kind of compromise between political expediency and economic realities. The author also notes that the Asian region is characterized by very active attempts to resolve the legal status of cryptocurrencies at the legislative level, and not just administrative or judicial response to the actual legal relationship, although the progress of different countries in this matter is different. As a result, the author concludes that in the Asian countries considered in the article, there is no same view on the legal nature of cryptocurrency, its qualification as an object of civil rights, and ways to regulate transactions with it (libertarian approach, positive-cryptocurrency approach but with detailed government regulation and control or a completely restrictive policy in relation to the cryptocurrency market).

Intersectional relations between executive law and civil law of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
pp. 169-175
Author(s):  
N. Sergiienko
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Mutual Influence ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Executive Process ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

The scientific article is devoted to analyze the intersectional relations between executive law of Ukraine and civil law of Ukraine. The classification of forms of intersectional relations, offered by M.Yu Chelyshev, was taken as the ground of theoretical and methodological base of scientific research the intersectional relations between executive law of Ukraine and civil law of Ukraine. Even though this scientist-lawyer researched the intersectional relations of civil law, grounding on the subject of his scientific researches, his classification is stated as universal and grounded enough and can be used for different legal researches. In the scientific article the intersectional relations between executive law of and civil law of Ukraine are discovered though direction as follows: 1) intersectional interaction between executive law of Ukraine and civil law of Ukraine (it represents by using in executive law definitions and constructions of civil law. As an example of definitions and constructions of civil law, that are used in executive law, can be stated the definition of agreement); 2) intersectional influence between executive law and civil law (it represents by mutual influence of compositions of executive law and civil law, especially norms and institutions. The bright example of that mutual influence is the legal status of some kinds of property on the context of forfeiture the property – some kinds of property are out of forfeiture in the executive process, despite that property are out of turnover restrictions); 4) intersectional legal and collision regulation (it represents by direct and indirect mutual renvois between civil legislation and executive legislation. As an example can be used the direct renvoi to art. 28 of The Civil Code of Ukraine from subpar. 5 par. 2 sec. III of The Instruction of Compulsory Execution Organization, approved by The Ministry of Justice of Ukraine from 02.04.2012 under № 512/5).

scholarly journals DIGITAL CURRENCY AS A SUBJECT OF CRIME AND A MEANS OF COMMITTING CRIMES

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
A.A. Korennaya
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Digital Currency ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Official Recognition

In this article, the author examines the issues of the criminal legal status of digital currency as an objectand as a means of committing a crime. In 2020, a special Federal law was adopted defining the legal status ofdigital assets, as well as amendments were made to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation concerning theestablishment of the legal status of cryptocurrency or digital currency in the terminology of these regulationsas an object of civil rights. Significant changes in the civil legal regulation of cryptocurrencies have led to achange in approaches to assessing the criminal legal status of virtual money. In particular, the recognitionof digital currency by other property has allowed solving a number of qualification issues, but until now,criminal law is very cautious about the official recognition of cryptocurrency as the subject of a crime. Theauthor of the work offers options for the qualification of crimes committed using digital currency, in theabsence of changes in the criminal law and explanations of the Highest Court.

scholarly journals Theoretical aspects of distinguishing the concepts of «scientific and technical information» and «information resource»

2021 ◽  
pp. 166-174
Author(s):  
N.Ia. Bashuryn
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Technical Information ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Information Resource ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Complex Object ◽  
Information Product ◽  
Scientific And Technical Information ◽  
The Subject

Scientific and technical information is a complex object that may under certain conditions fall under the legal regulation of information, civil law, including copyright and patent law. The author examines the manifestations of scientific and technical information as an object of civil rights in particular. The concept of scientific and technical information and its specific features are defined. The article states that as an object of civil law, scientific and technical information can be interpreted as a personal intangible asset, as well as an informational scientific and technical product or informational scientific and technical resource. To qualitatively distinguish these concepts, their definitions and basic identifying features are given. The article states that despite the delimitation of these concepts, they are closely interrelated and often interdependent. It is noted that the information product and information resource are not identical concepts, although as an object of civil rights have a similar legal nature and characteristics. The author consider, that scientific and technical information as a good has no value and cannot be the subject of property relations. The product-subject (thing) circulates in the information market and has a value in the form of an information product or resource, is characterized by individually defined features of the thing and is the subject of transactions. It is determined that scientific and technical information and scientific and technical information product or resource - categories are not identical in content, because: 1) scientific and technical information is good; scientific and technical information product (resource) - a thing; rights on scientific and technical information, if it contains indications about the object of intellectual property rights, - regulated by the subinstitution of exclusive rights; rights from a scientific and technical information product or scientific and technical information resource - the institute of property law.

scholarly journals Civil Law Regime of Genes as Objects of Civil Rights

Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 100-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Levushkin
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Private Life ◽  
Genomic Technologies ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Genomic Studies ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Genetic Structures

At the present stage of the formation of the rule of law and developed civil society in the Russian Federation, the possibility of using and protecting genes, genomes and genomic technologies, mainly related to the sphere of private life, becomes particularly relevant. The world has already formed a scientific direction — gene editing. The practice of implementation of such developments is aimed at the implementation of genetic «improvement» of a person, his life and health. Society has existed for a long time in the era of genetic engineering. Currently, quite a large number of scientific studies are being conducted and many practical experiments are being implemented, both medical and socio-legal, aimed at involving genes and genetic structures in the framework of the legal field, in civil circulation.A particularly large number of questions and practical problems arise in determining the possibility of including genes and genomes as objects of legal relations and their definition as objects of civil rights.Debatable is the question of the turnover of genes, genomes, genetic structures and the possibility of making various civil transactions with them, the entry of subjects (participants) of genomic technologies in the binding and proprietary relationships with genes. The possibility of inclusion of genes and genomes in the objects of intellectual property rights and ensure their patent protection, the establishment of legal protective procedures is proved.There is an objective need to qualify and determine the legal nature of genes and genomes as objects of civil rights and the establishment of a special civil regime of genes, genomes and genetic structures. This special civil law regime of genes has a civil law nature. The author’s definition of a special civil-law regime of genes as objects of civil rights is proposed, the features and content of this regime are determined. The possibility of regulatory and legal regulation of genomic studies and the implementation of their results in medical practice is proved.

scholarly journals Prospects for settlement of the legal status of cryptocurrency in Ukraine

2021 ◽  
pp. 152-157
Author(s):  
V.M. Lohoyda
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Securities Market ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Electronic Money ◽  
Current State ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The One

The article is devoted to the current state and prospects of further legislative regulation in Ukraine of the legal status of cryptocurrency (cryptoassets), primarily in terms of the need to clearly define its place in the system of objects of civil rights. The author emphasizes on the current uncertainty at the national and international level about the legal nature of cryptocurrency that causes gaps in the legal regulation of this phenomenon, which on the one hand allows its free and accelerated development, but on the other - creates significant legal risks for participants of the relevant legal relationships. Based on the comparative legal analysis of the approaches of different countries to the qualification of the legal essence of cryptocurrency, as well as the analysis of the Laws of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption", "On Prevention and Counteraction to Legalization (Laundering) of Proceeds from Crime, Financing  Terrorism and Financing Spread of the Weapon of Mass Destruction”, the draft Law of Ukraine“ On Virtual Assets ”№3637 of 11.06.2020 adopted as a basis and prepared for the second reading by the Parliament and opinions of national regulators of financial market and securities market the author considers as a debatable approach of Ukrainian authorities to regulation circulation of virtual assets and, in particular, such their type as a cryptocurrency, as an intangible asset (other intangible goods). There is a contradiction of such a qualification in terms of traditional features of intangible assets (pronounced personal nature, the impossibility of the existence of such goods in isolation from the subject of law without his consent, lack of property and economic content) and the economic purpose of cryptocurrency as a mean of payment. In this regard, the author concludes that there should be an expediency of classifying this object of civil rights as a special (private) form of money, for which he proposes to carry out a more detailed civil law classification with a division into fiat (cash, non-cash, digital) and private (cryptocurrencies and electronic money).

SMART CONTRACT: CONCEPT, LEGAL REGULATION, ASPECTS OF CONSUMER PROTECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-247
Author(s):  
IRINA VIKTOROVNA ERMAKOVA ◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Smart Contracts ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Smart Contract ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of the research is legal norms aimed at regulating by law relations in the field of concluding and executing smart contracts, including issues of protecting the rights of the parties to such contracts, including consumers. The object of the research is social relations arising in the process of creating, concluding and executing of smart contracts. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and practical aspects of the definition of the concept of “smart contract” and its essence, as well as its legal status. In addition, the article considers approaches to defining the essence of institutions that are closely related to the category of “smart contract”, such as “cryptocurrency”, “digital ruble”, “mining”. The aspects of the protection of fundamental rights of the parties involved in the considered legal relationship, including consumers, are also analyzed. Examples of court decisions regarding the corresponding category of cases are given. The novelty of the research lies in determining the current approaches in relation to the essence, concept and legal status of smart contracts, including the current position of law enforcement practice in relation to this issue. In addition, the novelty of the study lies in considering the practical aspects of the conclusion and execution of smart contracts, including, indicating examples of blockchain platforms on the basis of which smart contracts can function. Ultimately, the study led to the development by the author of some proposals in order to improve the relevant legislation. In particular, the author proposed to consolidate at the legislative level the legal definition of the concept of “smart contract”, indicating the appropriate wording.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document