scholarly journals ACTS OF “SOFT” LAW AS REGULATORS OF PRIVATE LAW RELATIONS

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ольга Муратова ◽  
Olga Muratova
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Soft Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Dialectical Approach ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Common ◽  
Combination Of Methods ◽  
Methods Of Learning

The article covers the question of the enforcement of acts of “soft” law — unformal sources of regulation of public relations. It is pointed in the article, that though acts of “soft” law are not the sources of law in traditional understanding, such acts are important practical regulators of private-law relations. The author gives the common characteristic of acts of “soft” law, makes comparative analyses with legal acts. Although the most attention in the article is paid to the legal effect of the enforcement of acts of “soft” law, first of all, from the view of regulation of private-law relations. While preparing the article the complex of methods was used, which lay on the basis of systematical and dialectical concepts. The main conclusion of the issue is the acknowledgement of the fact of the exercising of influence by the acts of “soft” law on regulation of private-law relations. This article is based on a combination of methods of cognition, which amounted to a systematic and dialectical approach. The author appeals to the general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction) and to the specially-legal methods of learning: formal-legal, comparative legal, structural and functional.

Administration of the educational process (legal and linguistic-didactic aspects) in the conditions of quarantine and post-quarantine measures caused by covid-19

Eduweb ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-193
Author(s):  
Vira Mizetska ◽  
Olena Sierykh ◽  
Hanna Savchuk ◽  
Diana Yevtimova ◽  
Oleh Synieokyi
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Educational Processes ◽  
Special Scientific ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Impact

The aim of the study is to characterize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the administration of the educational process on the examples of legal and linguistic-didactic aspects. The object of the study is systemic and functional changes in science and education under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The subject of the study is public relations in the field of education and science in their legal and linguistic-didactic aspect under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Research methods are general scientific and special scientific methods, in particular, system-structural, formal-legal, hermeneutic; methods of analysis, synthesis. As a result of the research, the peculiarities of administration of educational processes in the conditions of COVID-19 in the aspect of mechanisms of legal support of activity of bodies of education and science, linguodidactics were formulated; the characteristic of systemic changes in the sphere of education which have occurred under the influence of the distribution of a coronavirus is carried out; describe the main approaches contained in the current scientific literature to solve the above problems.

The phenomenon of “legal force”: methodological approaches

2021 ◽  
pp. 22-38
Author(s):  
Elena A. Larina
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Electronic Documents ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Integral Element ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
Legal Force

The study reveals some of the phenomenon of legal force features, which is an integral element of regulatory legal acts, as well as contracts, electronic documents that act as regulators of public relations. The purpose is to determine the methodological approaches with the help of which it is pos-sible to study this phenomenon more fully, as well as to identify the short-comings of the existing approaches. The dialectical-materialistic method, general scientific methods, special legal methods are used as methods. In the course of the research, we turn to such methodological approaches as histori-cal, logical, hermeneutic, comparative, systemic, synergistic, humanistic, cy-bernetic, structural, functional. A brief description of them is given (the fea-tures are determined, the views of legal scholars on these methodological ap-proaches and the applicability of such approaches in relation to the study of the phenomenon of legal force are reflected). We come to the conclusion about the insufficiency of the currently existing research methodological ap-proaches in relation to the category of “legal force” and determine some prospects for the development of this topic. We prove that methodological approaches allow us to study not only the features of the category of “legal force” (classification, purpose, etc.), but also the specifics of acts, documents, the process of their adoption, application.

scholarly journals State sovereignty and dialectics of its evolution in the modern context

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-88
Author(s):  
Nataliia Zhukovskaya ◽  
Elena Vladimirovna Kalinina
Keyword(s):  
State Sovereignty ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
National Interests ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Separate Spheres ◽  
Dialectical Approach ◽  
Current Context ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Impact

This article reviews the prerequisites, content and consequences of the impact of global processes on the sovereignty of modern states. The object of this research is the international legal relations and their peculiarities in the current context. The subject is the conditions and forms of restriction of sovereignty of national states, as well as contributing factors. Special attention is given to representations on the “fate” of sovereign rights and variants of their transformation reflected in the scientific literature, as well as change in the vector of development of globalization processes under the influence of strategy of the countries that act in accordance with their sovereign rights and national interests. The main method of “diluting” the state sovereignty are viewed based on the general scientific methods − induction and deduction, analysis, generalization, abstraction, modeling; sectoral methods of studying global processes: political scientific, statistical, formal-legal, specific-historical, and comparative. The research relies on the dialectical approach towards analyzing the concept of state sovereignty. The following conclusions were made: 1) modern world marks to multidirectional trends that testify to the transformation of state sovereignty, narrowing of its separate spheres in the conditions of globalization, or on the other hand, change in the vector of development of the global processes; 2) there is virtually no formal legal equality of the countries set by the leading norms of international law and underlying sovereignty; however, the national states continue demonstrating the resistance to global challenges; at the same time, the most “impregnable” for leveling sovereign rights is not the economy or politics, but cultural-historical values (the sphere of humanities); 3) in the conditions of globalization, the prospect of losing sovereignty depends on the degree of resistance to external challenges demonstrated by a particular state.

scholarly journals The Forms of Criminal Prosecution

Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 167-175
Author(s):  
Ilya Dikarev ◽  
◽  
Sailaubek Baymanov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Theoretical Position ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Common

Introduction: the paper discusses the possibility of differentiating the forms of criminal prosecution. The critical analysis is subject to the widespread position in the science of criminal procedure that the forms of criminal prosecution are suspicion and accusation. This point of view is based on the conclusion that the content of criminal prosecution varies depending on the degree of proof of the guilt of the person subject to criminal prosecution. Concerning compliance with the principle of adversarial parties, the theoretical position is also evaluated, according to which one of the forms of criminal prosecution is conviction. The question of the grounds for differentiating the forms of criminal prosecution is studied. Purpose: the confirming the unified nature of the criminal prosecution carried out during the pretrial proceedings, regardless of the procedural position of the person accused of committing the crime. Methods: the paper uses the general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, a systematic approach, as well as specific scientific methods: legal interpretation and logical-legal. The methodological framework was the dialectical method. Results: the study of the common position in the science of criminal procedure, according to which criminal prosecution at different stages of its implementation consistently takes the forms of suspicion and accusation, showed its inconsistency. From the standpoint of philosophy, the content always has a determining value, and the form is always determined. Accordingly, to establish a change in the form of criminal prosecution, it is necessary to make sure that the content of this activity changes. However, the degree of proof of the person’s involvement in the crime is not reflected in the content of the accusatory activity, it remains the same. Therefore, suspicion and accusation do not form the independent forms of criminal prosecution. At the same time, the differentiation of the forms of criminal prosecution is possible, but on different grounds. Conclusions: the differentiation of the forms of criminal prosecution should be made depending on, first, the organization of procedural activities that determine the role and powers of the subject of criminal prosecution in the process of proof; secondly, the procedural status of the participant in the criminal process on the part of the prosecution and, thirdly, the content of the fact in issue.

scholarly journals Categories of reasonableness and good faith in private law regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3A) ◽  
pp. 60-66
Author(s):  
Natalya I. Besedkina ◽  
Vasily V. Gushchin ◽  
Taimuraz E. Kallagov ◽  
Tatiana V. Larina ◽  
Zlata V. Makarchuk
Keyword(s):  
Financial Markets ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Structural Concrete ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Law Regulation

The purpose of the article is to study the legal nature and essence of the categories of reasonableness and good faith in the field of private law regulation in the legislation of modern Russia. The methodological basis of the research was the general scientific dialectical method of cognition and the private scientific methods that follow from it: system-structural, concrete-sociological, technical-legal, historical-legal, and comparative legal methods. Their application allowed the authors of the article to study the objects under consideration in their interrelation, integrity, comprehensively and objectively. The article concludes that good faith is essential in filling the gaps in the legislation. It is not always possible to establish a single rule, to approve a norm that excludes unfair conduct. The gaps are not only due to legislative errors. Two factors have an important impact: the diversity of relations and their constant development in different areas (for example, e-commerce, financial markets).

scholarly journals STATE SUPPORT: CONSTITUTIONAL FIXING IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 813-817
Author(s):  
Aleksej N. Nifanov ◽  
Andrey V. Sushkov ◽  
Abdurahman A. Shahbanov ◽  
Vasilij A. Zajcev ◽  
Elnur E. Veliev
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
The State ◽  
State Support ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Dialectical Approach ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Alternative Approaches ◽  
Scientific System

Purpose: Taking into account the domestic experience, the present study was aimed at carrying out a comparative analysis of the constitutions of foreign countries in order to identify the norms related to the state support in them. Methodology: The present study was carried out based on a dialectical approach to investigate the legal phenomena and processes, using general scientific (system, logical, analysis and synthesis) and private scientific methods. Result: The findings of this study revealed the opportunity for the organization of various recipients of the declared support; and identification of alternative approaches to consolidation of the constitutional laws regarding the state support. Applications: This research can be used for universities and students in politic. Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of constitutional fixing in foreign countries is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.

scholarly journals PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL NATURE OF THE LAW PRINCIPLE: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF RESEARCH

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-571
Author(s):  
Andrey V. Skorobogatov ◽  
Alexandr V. Krasnov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Integrative Approach ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Methodological Problems ◽  
The Law ◽  
Ontological Aspect

The article explores the legal nature of law principles from the perspective of philosophical and legal analysis. The purpose of the article is to form scientifically based knowledge on the philosophical and legal nature of the category law principle using postclassical methodological tools. Research Methods: The methodology of the article is based on the postclassical scientific rationality. The authors use an integrative approach to the study of legal reality in combination with a phenomenological and synergetic methodology, thereby using a number of general scientific and special scientific methods in a particular logical system, which makes it possible to study law principles both ontologically, in terms of their role in law in general, and epistemologically as well as axiologically. Moreover, the content, functioning and development of law principles are considered phenomenologically, as well as in the context of law communication. Results: The law principle in the ontological aspect is a fundamental form of law, reflecting the most significant ideas concerning regulation of public relations; the law principle is used as a direct regulator along with the rule of law. The epistemological law principle can be interpreted as a generalizing category, reflecting interpretation and assessment of legal reality from the standpoint of postclassical methodology. From an axiological point of view, the law principle embodies the law and social values and traditions that are dominant within the framework of a given socio-cultural chronotope, and is also used as one of the fundamental tools for constructing legal reality and its development. Conclusions: the law nature of law principles is determined with the account of postclassical methodology onto-logically, epistemologically and axiologically, in terms of their dual role in formation, development and construction of legal reality at all of its levels, in the context of both objective and subjective factors. The findings can be applied in drawing up concepts of legal and judicial reforms in terms of targeted construction of legal reality, as well as in the process of predicting the development of the Russian legal system.

Constitutional and Legal Institute of the Ombudsman and Specialized Ombudsman for Migration in Foreign Countries: Formation and Development

2021 ◽  
pp. 54-61
Author(s):  
S. G. Trifonov ◽  
◽  
K. V. Trifonova
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Migrant Workers ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Special Scientific ◽  
Scientific Principles ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Rights And Interests

Currently, the Ombudsman is a traditional component of democratic legal systems. The creation of such a body, as noted in the Council of Europe Resolution «On the role of commissioners/ombudsmen in the protection of citizens’ rights», which would try to ensure justice, respect for the foundations of the rule of law and at the same time be able to establish a dialogue with citizens, is necessary in many States. The purpose and objectives of this article are to consider the issues of the emergence and development of the constitutional-legal institution as an Ombudsman in General, and the evolution of this institution, in which there were various models and types of ombudsmen. It is also necessary to describe the existing models of the Ombudsman applied in different States. The article examines the functional specialization of ombudsmen, which occurs through the introduction of ombudsmen in certain areas of public relations or to protect the rights and interests of the most legally vulnerable categories and groups of the population, and specifically the emergence of the institution of migration ombudsmen. The methodology of the article is based on a set of philosophical and worldview, General scientific principles and approaches and special scientific methods of cognition of constitutional and legal phenomena. When writing, a number of General scientific and special scientific methods were used, including: system and structural-functional methods, sociological method, formal-logical method, comparative-legal method. As a result of the research, we can conclude that the essential characteristics of the Ombudsman institution have changed from the institution of supervision of the administration and the court to the most important human rights mechanism that it represents at the present stage. Within the framework of the functioning of the institution of the Ombudsman, different models have been identified in different States and specialized ombudsmen have appeared, including those dealing with the protection of the legal rights and interests of migrant workers.

scholarly journals The development of customs law in the scope of Eurasian integration

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
A. Algazina
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Further Development

The subject. The paper is devoted to the main trends of the Russian customs law at the present stage.The purpose of the paper is to determine the place of customs law in the system of Russian law and to identify the features of its impact on the development of integration within the EAEU.The methodological basis for the study: general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, com-parison, description); private and academic (interpretation, formal-legal).Results, scope. Despite all the variety of social relations that make up the subject of customs law, their core is the relationship associated with the management of customs authorities, regulated by the rules of administrative law. In this regard, the allocation of customs law as an independent branch of law, in our opinion, is premature.Further development of integration within the EAEU has necessitated the development and adoption of a new codified legal act regulating public relations in the field of customs.Analysis of the provisions of the customs code of the EAEU revealed the following innovations, confirming the thesis on the simplification of regulation in the sphere of customs affairs:– reduction of terms of performance of separate customs operations;– priority of electronic Declaration form;– improvement of the Institute of customs control;– further development of the Institute of authorized economic operators.Conclusions. Customs law is a sub-branch of administrative law at present. A natural con-sequence of the integration processes is the transformation of the domestic customs law into an alloy of international law, integration law (acts of the EAEU) and national law.

scholarly journals Adaptive Model in Translation: Psycholinguistic Dimension

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Владислава Демецька
Keyword(s):  
Target Audience ◽  
Adaptive Model ◽  
Source Text ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Methods Of Analysis ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Common ◽  
Theoretical Overview ◽  
Translational Models

The aim of the article is to offer a theoretical overview of the relevance of the adaptive model in translation from psycholinguistic perspective. Based on psycholinguistic approach to defining the notions of adequacy/equivalency in translation the research suggests theoretically and methodologically justified reasons for applying the translational adaptation to culture-bound texts. The comprehensive analysis of the “adaptation” as a notion presupposes the implementation of the hierarchy of the scientific methods of analysis among which the most relevant are: general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis of theoretical discussions on adaptation, text-typological structural/functional, psycholinguistic and translational methods of text analysis. An adaptive potential of a text is defined within the framework of intralinguistic and interlinguistic comparison of pragmatic texts, which grounds the adaptive translational models of pragmatic texts under analysis. The results of the research speak to the fact that from the psycholinguistic perspective the notion of an equivalent translation presupposes the transcoding of the content of a source text with its semantic, stylistic and functionally communicative information. On the other hand, the notion of an adequate translation is understood as the translational reproduction of the reaction which is caused by the source text on the audience taking into account text-typological, cultural, psychological stereotypes of the target audience. In conclusion one can state that the adequate variant of translation of pragmatic culture-bound text is possible under the conditions of its adaptation to the linguocultural stereotypes of the target audience. In other words, the common beam of the adequacy in translation is the target audience’s comprehension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document