scholarly journals Long-term Outcomes after Frey's Procedure for Chronic Pancreatitis with an Inflammatory Mass of the Pancreatic Head, with Special Reference to Locoregional Complications

2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Aimoto ◽  
Eiji Uchida ◽  
Akira Matsushita ◽  
Yoichi Kawano ◽  
Satoshi Mizutani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Special Reference ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Inflammatory Mass ◽  
Frey’S Procedure

Patient-reported Long-term Outcomes after Duodenum-preserving Pancreatic Head Resection (Berne Modification) for Chronic Pancreatitis

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. S88-S89
Author(s):  
Willem Niesen ◽  
Thomas Hank ◽  
Yoana Angelova ◽  
Ulf Hinz ◽  
Christian Scheele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Pancreatic Head Resection ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported

The Pylorus Preserving Whipple Procedure for the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traverso
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Symptomatic Patient ◽  
Whipple Procedure ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
New Procedures

A schema is developed that outlines criteria to consider more than medical therapy for patients with severe pancreatitis that develop disabling abdominal pain. If the symptomatic patient has severe chronic pancreatitis that reaches the Cambridge Class V "marked" stage of image severity then endotherapy is indicated. If endotherapy fails then surgery is indicated. Usually these patients will have pathological changes centered in the pancreatic head and PPW is performed. After an average follow-up of > 4 years PPW was observed to provide either good to excellent relief of disabling abdominal pain. These patients were highly selected by the guidance of the anatomic profile of the composite pancreas. Long-term follow-up has never been available with cancer patients after the Whipple procedure. These chronic pancreatitis patients after PPW showed few GI side effects. In addition we did not observe a predisposition for diabetes other than that from the continued parenchymal destruction from smoldering chronic pancreatitis in the pancreatic remnant. Surgeons should avoid total pancreatectomy in patients, even if the patient is already diabetic. Marginal ulceration is highly associated with the total resection. From this personal experience using anatomic criteria and close follow-up, it is hoped that the long term outcomes of pain relief in virtually all patients after PPW will represent a benchmark for results after procedures which employ less resection. Therapy should be based on reliable imaging criteria to select patients. Then the outcomes of new and promising procedures such as lithotripsy or limited head resections can be compared to the benchmarks derived after PPW. None of the new procedures, however address the main problem after PPW of remnant pancreatitis in the pancreatic body/tail. Even though this discomfort is no longer disabling after head resection remnant pancreatitis does occur in approximately one out of four patients.

Long-term Outcomes Favor Duodenum-preserving Pancreatic Head Resection over Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Chronic Pancreatitis: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 909-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant B. Sukharamwala ◽  
Krishen D. Patel ◽  
Anthony F. Teta ◽  
Shailraj Parikh ◽  
Sharona B. Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Endocrine Insufficiency ◽  
Significant Difference

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) are important treatment options for patients with chronic pancreatitis. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the long-term outcomes of DPPHR versus PPPD in patients with chronic pancreatitis. A systematic literature search was conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases on all studies published between January 1991 and January 2013 reporting intermediate and long-term outcomes after DPPHR and PPPD for chronic pancreatitis. Long-term outcomes of interest were complete pain relief, quality of life, professional rehabilitation, exocrine insufficiency, and endocrine insufficiency. Other outcomes of interest included perioperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS). Ten studies were included comprising of 569 patients. There was no significant difference in complete pain relief ( P = 0.24), endocrine insufficiency ( P = 0.15), and perioperative morbidity ( P = 0.13) between DPPHR and PPPD. However, quality of life ( P < 0.00001), professional rehabilitation ( P = 0.004), exocrine insufficiency ( P = 0.005), and LOS ( P = 0.00001) were significantly better for patients undergoing DPPHR compared with PPPD. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in endocrine insufficiency, postoperative pain relief, and perioperative morbidity for patients undergoing DPPHR versus PPPD. Improved intermediate and long-term outcomes including LOS, quality of life, professional rehabilitation, and preservation of exocrine function make DPPHR a more favorable approach than PPPD for patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Long-term outcomes of pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
M.A. Zakharova ◽  
A.G. Kriger ◽  
G.G. Karmazanovsky ◽  
E.V. Kondratyev ◽  
Yu.S. Galchina
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Pancreatic Head Resection ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

scholarly journals Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection. Early postoperative outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
I. A. Kozlov ◽  
M. D. Baydarova ◽  
T. V. Shevchenko ◽  
R. Z. Ikramov ◽  
Yu. O. Zharikov
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Pancreatic Head Resection ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pancreatic Fistulas ◽  
Hospital Morbidity

Aim. To study the early postoperative outcomes of duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resections in benign, premalignant tumors of the pancreatic head and chronic pancreatitis complicated by duodenal dystrophy in comparison with the results of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Materials and methods. From 2006 to 2019, 54 patients underwent duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis complicated by duodenal dystrophy, benign or premalignant tumors of the pancreatic head. At the same time, in 25 cases, the operation was performed in an isolated version, in 29 – with a resection of the duodenum. As a comparison group, we used data from 89 patients who underwent pyloruspreserving pancreaticoduodenectomy during the same period. Results. Compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy, duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection exhibits significantly longer times for surgery (420 and 310 minutes, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss. There are no differences between groups in hospital morbidity (the frequency of pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage and post-resection bleeding). The frequency of postoperative complications for Clavien-Dindo III and higher did not differ significantly in the groups. There is no hospital mortality after duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection; three patients died after pancreatoduodenectomy. Conclusion. Early postoperative outcomes following duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy are comparable. However, to develop a full-fledged concept of surgical treatment of pancreatic head benign, premalignant neoplasms and chronic pancreatitis with duodenal dystrophy, it is necessary to analyze the long-term outcomes of treatment.

RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PANCREATITIS AND THE RISK OF CANCER AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-233
Author(s):  
Vladimir Lubyanskiy ◽  
Vasiliy Seroshtanov ◽  
Ye. Semenova
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Fibrous Tissue ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Head Region ◽  
Intestinal Anastomoses ◽  
Resection Of The Pancreas ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

The aim: To analyze results of surgical treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and to assess the causes of pancreatic cancer after surgical treatment. Materials and methods: 137 patients had duodenum-preserving resections of the pancreas. Results: In the histological examination of the pancreas it was established that the growth of fibrous tissue was registered in patients with CP., which in 19 (13.8%) almost completely replaced the acinar tissue. In the long term after the operation from 6 months to 2 years in 8 patients (5.8%) pancreatic cancer was detected. Possible causes of tumor origin were analyzed, the value of preservation of ductal hypertension, which affects the state of the duct’s epithelium, was established. The most commonly used for treatment of chronic pancreatitis the Frey surgery removed pancreatic hypertension but in two patients during the operation an insufficient volume of the pancreatic head was reconstructed. In the case of the abandonment of a large array of fibrous tissue, local hypertension was retained in the region of the ductal structures of the head, which led to the transformation of the duct epithelium. An essential factor in the problem of the preservation of pancreatic hypertension were the stenosis of pancreatic intestinal anastomoses, they arose in the long term in 4 operated patients. With stenosis of anastomosis after duodenum-preserving resection both the hypertension factor and the regeneration factor could be realized, which under certain circumstances might be significant. Conclusion: After resection of the pancreas for CP cancer was diagnosed in 5.8% of patients. The main method of preventing the risk of cancer was performing the Frey surgery for CP eliminating pancreatic hypertension in the head region of the pancreas. Diagnosis of stenosis in the late period after resection of the pancreas was an important element in the prevention of recurrence of cancer since a timely reconstructive operation could improve the drainage of duct structures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document