scholarly journals Mutational Analyses of a Single-Stranded Telomeric DNA Binding Domain of Fission Yeast Pot1: Conflict with X-Ray Crystallographic Structure

2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 481-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetaka TORIGOE ◽  
Naoshi DOHMAE ◽  
Fumio HANAOKA ◽  
Ayako FURUKAWA
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Crystallographic Structure ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Telomeric Dna ◽  
X Ray

scholarly journals Rgg protein structure–function and inhibition by cyclic peptide compounds

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (16) ◽  
pp. 5177-5182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Parashar ◽  
Chaitanya Aggarwal ◽  
Michael J. Federle ◽  
Matthew B. Neiditch
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Structure Function ◽  
Cyclosporin A ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Disulfide Bond ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Peptide Pheromone ◽  
Dimerization Interface

Peptide pheromone cell–cell signaling (quorum sensing) regulates the expression of diverse developmental phenotypes (including virulence) in Firmicutes, which includes common human pathogens, e.g.,Streptococcus pyogenesandStreptococcus pneumoniae. Cytoplasmic transcription factors known as “Rgg proteins” are peptide pheromone receptors ubiquitous in Firmicutes. Here we present X-ray crystal structures of aStreptococcusRgg protein alone and in complex with a tight-binding signaling antagonist, the cyclic undecapeptide cyclosporin A. To our knowledge, these represent the first Rgg protein X-ray crystal structures. Based on the results of extensive structure–function analysis, we reveal the peptide pheromone-binding site and the mechanism by which cyclosporin A inhibits activation of the peptide pheromone receptor. Guided by the Rgg–cyclosporin A complex structure, we predicted that the nonimmunosuppressive cyclosporin A analog valspodar would inhibit Rgg activation. Indeed, we found that, like cyclosporin A, valspodar inhibits peptide pheromone activation of conserved Rgg proteins in medically relevantStreptococcusspecies. Finally, the crystal structures presented here revealed that the Rgg protein DNA-binding domains are covalently linked across their dimerization interface by a disulfide bond formed by a highly conserved cysteine. The DNA-binding domain dimerization interface observed in our structures is essentially identical to the interfaces previously described for other members of the XRE DNA-binding domain family, but the presence of an intermolecular disulfide bond buried in this interface appears to be unique. We hypothesize that this disulfide bond may, under the right conditions, affect Rgg monomer–dimer equilibrium, stabilize Rgg conformation, or serve as a redox-sensitive switch.

scholarly journals The Crystal Structure of the DNA-Binding Domain of Yeast RAP1 in Complex with Telomeric DNA

Cell ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter König ◽  
Rafael Giraldo ◽  
Lynda Chapman ◽  
Daniela Rhodes
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Telomeric Dna

Crystallization and Preliminary X-ray Analysis of the DNA Binding Domain of the Hin Recombinase with Its DNA Binding Site

1993 ◽  
Vol 232 (3) ◽  
pp. 982-986
Author(s):  
Jin-An Feng ◽  
Melvin Simon ◽  
David P. Mack ◽  
Peter B. Dervan ◽  
Reid C. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Dna Binding Site ◽  
Hin Recombinase

scholarly journals DNA-binding domain of myelin-gene regulatory factor: purification, crystallization and X-ray analysis. Corrigendum

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (12) ◽  
pp. 713-713
Author(s):  
WenYu Wu ◽  
Xiangkai Zhen ◽  
Ning Shi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Regulatory Factor ◽  
Acta Cryst ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Myelin Gene

An extra affiliation is added for the authors of the article by Wu et al. [(2017), Acta Cryst. F73, 393–397].

scholarly journals Structural basis for DNA recognition and allosteric control of the retinoic acid receptors RAR–RXR

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (17) ◽  
pp. 9969-9985
Author(s):  
Judit Osz ◽  
Alastair G McEwen ◽  
Maxime Bourguet ◽  
Frédéric Przybilla ◽  
Carole Peluso-Iltis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Structural Dynamics ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Retinoic Acid Receptors ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Binding Modes ◽  
Dna Complexes ◽  
X Ray

Abstract Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) as a functional heterodimer with retinoid X receptors (RXRs), bind a diverse series of RA-response elements (RAREs) in regulated genes. Among them, the non-canonical DR0 elements are bound by RXR–RAR with comparable affinities to DR5 elements but DR0 elements do not act transcriptionally as independent RAREs. In this work, we present structural insights for the recognition of DR5 and DR0 elements by RXR–RAR heterodimer using x-ray crystallography, small angle x-ray scattering, and hydrogen/deuterium exchange coupled to mass spectrometry. We solved the crystal structures of RXR–RAR DNA-binding domain in complex with the Rarb2 DR5 and RXR–RXR DNA-binding domain in complex with Hoxb13 DR0. While cooperative binding was observed on DR5, the two molecules bound non-cooperatively on DR0 on opposite sides of the DNA. In addition, our data unveil the structural organization and dynamics of the multi-domain RXR–RAR DNA complexes providing evidence for DNA-dependent allosteric communication between domains. Differential binding modes between DR0 and DR5 were observed leading to differences in conformation and structural dynamics of the multi-domain RXR–RAR DNA complexes. These results reveal that the topological organization of the RAR binding element confer regulatory information by modulating the overall topology and structural dynamics of the RXR–RAR heterodimers.

scholarly journals Functional Dissection of Human and Mouse POT1 Proteins

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Palm ◽  
Dirk Hockemeyer ◽  
Tatsuya Kibe ◽  
Titia de Lange
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Telomeric Dna ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
End Resection

ABSTRACT The single-stranded telomeric DNA binding protein POT1 protects mammalian chromosome ends from the ATR-dependent DNA damage response, regulates telomerase-mediated telomere extension, and limits 5′-end resection at telomere termini. Whereas most mammals have a single POT1 gene, mice have two POT1 proteins that are functionally distinct. POT1a represses the DNA damage response, and POT1b controls 5′-end resection. In contrast, as we report here, POT1a and POT1b do not differ in their ability to repress telomere recombination. By swapping domains, we show that the DNA binding domain of POT1a specifies its ability to repress the DNA damage response. However, no differences were detected in the in vitro DNA binding features of POT1a and POT1b. In contrast to the repression of ATR signaling by POT1a, the ability of POT1b to control 5′-end resection was found to require two regions in the C terminus, one corresponding to the TPP1 binding domain and a second representing a new domain located between amino acids (aa) 300 and 350. Interestingly, the DNA binding domain of human POT1 can replace that of POT1a to repress ATR signaling, and the POT1b region from aa 300 to 350 required for the regulation of the telomere terminus is functionally conserved in human POT1. Thus, human POT1 combines the features of POT1a and POT1b.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document