scholarly journals Effectiveness of nursing interventions in the postoperative recovery of gastric cancer patients: a systematic literature review

2016 ◽  
Vol IV Série (11) ◽  
pp. 111-119
Author(s):  
Noélia Gomes ◽  
Célia Santos ◽  
Maria Jesus ◽  
Marco Henriques
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Nursing Interventions ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients with BRCA 1/2 Germline Mutations: Report of Ten Cases and a Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 11637-11644
Author(s):  
Naama Halpern ◽  
Albert Grinshpun ◽  
Ben Boursi ◽  
Talia Golan ◽  
Ofer Margalit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Brca 1 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrectomy among Gastric Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Short-Term Analysis from a Single Institution in China

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Fei Sun ◽  
Kai Liu ◽  
Xue-Shang Su ◽  
Xuan Wei ◽  
Xiao-Long Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

Background. The da Vinci robotic system was considered an effectively alternative treatment option for early gastric cancer patients in recent years. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted gastrectomy in our center. Methods. This study included 33 patients who underwent robot-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) and 88 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) between January 2016 and April 2018. Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical parameters, postoperative recovery, and the learning curves of RAG were evaluated. Results. Baseline characteristics between two groups were well balanced. The operation time of RAG was longer than that of LAG (333.1±61.4 min vs. 290.6±39.0 min, p=0.001), and the estimated blood loss was 62.4±41.2 ml in the RAG group and 77.7±32.3 ml in the LAG group (p=0.005), respectively. The mean number of examined lymph nodes in RAG was less than that in LAG (30.3±10.2 vs. 37.4±13.7, p=0.008). However, RAG had an advantage in the dissection of No. 9 lymph nodes (3.4±2.1 vs. 2.5±1.6, p=0.039). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in both groups (p=0.735). There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative recovery between the two groups. The learning curve of RAG showed that the CUSUM value decreased from the 8th case, which suggested a rapid learning curve among experienced surgeons on LAG operations. Conclusions. RAG was safe and feasible for gastric cancer patients, with superiority in the dissection of No. 9 lymph nodes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document