scholarly journals A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny – The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG)

Taxon ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasim Azani ◽  
Marielle Babineau ◽  
C. Donovan Bailey ◽  
Hannah Banks ◽  
ArianeR. Barbosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Subfamily Classification

P–331 The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Keckstein ◽  
H Gernot
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Ovarian Endometriosis ◽  
Deep Endometriosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Complete Mapping

Abstract Study question Is there a classification for a complete mapping of endometriosis, including anatomical location, size of the lesions, and degree of involvement that can be used with both, diagnostics and surgery? Summary answer #Enzian classification improves in both, non-invasive diagnostic methods and surgical therapy for endometriosis as a universally usable classification system for all aspects of the disease. What is known already The most commonly used r-ASRM classification has certain limitations due to its incomplete description of DE, the complexity of the classification, and lack of reproducibility. In contrast, the Enzian classification, which has been implemented in the last decade, has proved to be the most suitable for the description of DE. However, since it does not include peritoneal and ovarian lesions and lacks a description of tubo-ovarian adhesions, it has not gained full acceptance. A combination of classification with different systems such as r-ASRM, EFI score and Enzian, may complicate classification of the disease due to overlaps and time-consuming documentation. Study design, size, duration The result is a consensus of a panel of renowned clinicians (working group), gynaecological surgeons and sonographers with extensive expertise in diagnosis and therapy of endometriosis. A first draft was written in 2019 by a joint effort of the first and last author and sent to all working group members. Taking all comments into account, a revised draft was then sent to all coauthors and repeated until a consensus was reached (9 revisions). Participants/materials, setting, methods Criteria used to invite the experts to participate in this consensus process included their having significant peer-reviewed publications in the field of diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Main results and the role of chance Our current proposal is the first of its kind to universally describe superficial and deep endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, adenomyosis and adhesions by using a classification system that can be applied by gynaecologists, surgeons, sonographers and radiologists following the same principles. The correlation between preoperative and surgical staging, on the basis of the Enzian scheme, allows for consistent and clear classification of endometriosis, especially DE. Endometriosis can be mapped completely with one single classification system enabling the use of one common language. Limitations, reasons for caution This classification system is anatomically logical and should be easy to use. Further studies are ongoing and are needed to provide proof for the applicability, reproducibility and accuracy of the #Enzian classification for the description of endometriosis. Wider implications of the findings: #Enzian classification now enabled better coverage of various endometriosis localizations. The possibility of using this system preoperatively as well as postoperatively within the framework of diagnostics offers clinicians a significant improvement in the care of patients with such a complex disease. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals The Banff Working Group Classification of Definitive Polyomavirus Nephropathy: Morphologic Definitions and Clinical Correlations

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 680-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Nickeleit ◽  
Harsharan K. Singh ◽  
Parmjeet Randhawa ◽  
Cinthia B. Drachenberg ◽  
Ramneesh Bhatnagar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Classification Scheme ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Morphologic Classification

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is a common viral infection of renal allografts, with biopsy-proven incidence of approximately 5%. A generally accepted morphologic classification of definitive PVN that groups histologic changes, reflects clinical presentation, and facilitates comparative outcome analyses is lacking. Here, we report a morphologic classification scheme for definitive PVN from the Banff Working Group on Polyomavirus Nephropathy, comprising nine transplant centers in the United States and Europe. This study represents the largest systematic analysis of definitive PVN undertaken thus far. In a retrospective fashion, clinical data were collected from 192 patients and correlated with morphologic findings from index biopsies at the time of initial PVN diagnosis. Histologic features were centrally scored according to Banff guidelines, including additional semiquantitative histologic assessment of intrarenal polyomavirus replication/load levels. In-depth statistical analyses, including mixed effects repeated measures models and logistic regression, revealed two independent histologic variables to be most significantly associated with clinical presentation: intrarenal polyomavirus load levels and Banff interstitial fibrosis ci scores. These two statistically determined histologic variables formed the basis for the definition of three PVN classes that correlated strongest with three clinical parameters: presentation at time of index biopsy, serum creatinine levels/renal function over 24 months of follow-up, and graft failure. The PVN classes 1–3 as described here can easily be recognized in routine renal biopsy specimens. We recommend using this morphologic PVN classification scheme for diagnostic communication, especially at the time of index diagnosis, and in scientific studies to improve comparative data analysis.

IHPBA concordant classification of primary liver cancer: working group report

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Makuuchi ◽  
Jacques Belghiti ◽  
Giulio Belli ◽  
Sheung-Tat Fan ◽  
Joseph Wan Yee Lau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Group Report

scholarly journals A new subfamily classification of the palm family (Arecaceae): evidence from plastid DNA phylogeny

2006 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
CONNY B. ASMUSSEN ◽  
JOHN DRANSFIELD ◽  
VINNIE DEICKMANN ◽  
ANDERS S. BARFOD ◽  
JEAN-CHRISTOPHE PINTAUD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plastid Dna ◽  
Dna Phylogeny ◽  
Subfamily Classification

A new fossil species of the Australian endemic genus Peradenia Naumann & Masner (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea, Peradeniidae) from Baltic Amber

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens-Wilhelm Janzen ◽  
Norman F. Johnson ◽  
Luciana Musetti
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Amber ◽  
Australian Capital Territory ◽  
Fossil Species ◽  
Southeastern Australia ◽  
Extant Species ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Status ◽  
Subfamily Classification ◽  
A New Species

AbstractThe family Peradeniidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea) is represented by two rare extant species from southeastern Australia (Australian Capital Territory, Victoria, Tasmania). A new species, Peradenia galerita sp. n., is described from Eocene Baltic amber. The fossil species is very similar to the living Perndenia, but has the short metasomatic petiole typical of most Proctotrupoidea. The subfamily classification of Heloridae proposed by Rasnitsyn and the status of Peradeniidae are briefly reviewed. The subfamily Mesohelorinae Rasnitsyn, 1990 is a junior synonym of Protohelorinae Rasnitsyn, 1980 (syn. n.).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document