scholarly journals Which is better for upper gastrointestinal bleeding resulted from portal hypertension, elective or emergency operation?

1969 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Liu
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Emergency Operation ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

scholarly journals Current Trends in Etiological Profile of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Northern India: A Retrospective Analysis of 5-Year Endoscopic Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 031-035
Author(s):  
Vishal Bodh ◽  
Brij Sharma ◽  
Rajesh Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
The Other ◽  
Western India ◽  
Anastomotic Site ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Etiological Spectrum ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract Introduction The etiological spectrum of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) varies from region to region. This study was performed to find out the latest etiological spectrum of the AUGIB in a tertiary care hospital in North India and to compare it with etiological spectra from a previous study from the same center and from the other regions of India. Methods Clinical notes and endoscopic data of all consecutive patients who had presented with AUGIB in Indira Gandhi Medical College Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, from May 2015 to December 2019, were analyzed retrospectively with the objective of finding out the various endoscopic etiologies that lead to AUGIB. The findings were compared with the previous study from the same center and with the data from the other regions of the country. Results A total of 1,513 patients were enrolled and majority were males (74.6%) with male:female ratio of 2.9:1. Majority were 41 to 60 years (46.46%) of age. Melena was the presenting complaint in 93.98% and hematemesis in 46.06%. Peptic ulcer disease (PUD; 46.19%) was the commonest cause of AUGIB followed by portal hypertension (26.23%). Other less common causes were erosive mucosal disease, erosive esophagitis, neoplasm, Mallory–Weiss tear, gastric angiodysplasia, anastomotic site ulcers, and Dieulafoy’s lesion. Conclusion PUD was still the commonest cause of AUGIB followed by portal hypertension. This is in agreement with the previous report from the same center and in contrast to the reports from other studies from Northern and Western India that create the impression that portal hypertension related bleeding is the most common cause of AUGIB in India.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and management of extrahepatic oesophageal variceal bleed in children in a low resourced setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-278
Author(s):  
Taiba J. Afaa ◽  
Kokou H. Amegan-Aho ◽  
Elikem Richardson ◽  
Bamenla Goka
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Resource Constraint ◽  
Oesophageal Varices ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) is a major cause of portal hypertension (PH) in children. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most common cause accounting for up to 75% of cases in developing countries. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is the most dreaded and commonest presentation of portal hypertension. Successful treatment of paediatric PH, though challenging is performed in resource constraint countries. Cases: Five children presented over three years to a tertiary hospital in Ghana, with massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. They had anaemia, thrombocytopaenia and four had splenomegaly. Liver function tests, INR, haemoglobin electrophoresis as well as HIV serology, hepatitis B and C screening were all normal. Abdominal doppler ultrasound scan confirmed portal vein thromboses. They were resuscitated and managed with octreotide, propranolol, antibiotics and sclerotherapy or oesophageal variceal banding in the acute setting and long term secondary prophylaxis with propranolol. Subsequently, an algorithm was developed to assist with the management of bleeding from oesophageal varices and the diagnosis of EHPVO. Conclusion: Portal hypertension due to EHPVO is an important cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in children. This can be successfully managed even in a resource constraint setting once the appropriate measures are taken.

scholarly journals Partial spleen embolization reduces the risk of portal hypertension-induced upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients not eligible for TIPS implantation

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. e0177401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Buechter ◽  
Alisan Kahraman ◽  
Paul Manka ◽  
Guido Gerken ◽  
Alexander Dechêne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

scholarly journals Evaluation of endoscopic secondary prophylaxis in children and adolescents with esophageal varices

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlio Rocha PIMENTA ◽  
Alexandre Rodrigues FERREIRA ◽  
Eleonora Druve Tavares FAGUNDES ◽  
Paulo Fernando Souto BITTENCOURT ◽  
Alice Mendes MOURA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Gastric Fundus ◽  
Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Bleeding of esophageal varices is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in children and adults with portal hypertension and there are few studies involving secondary prophylaxis in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic secondary prophylaxis in prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children and adolescents with esophageal varices. METHODS This is a prospective analysis of 85 patients less than 18 years of age with or without cirrhosis, with portal hypertension. Participants underwent endoscopic secondary prophylaxis with sclerotherapy or band ligation. Eradication of varices, incidence of rebleeding, number of endoscopic sessions required for eradication, incidence of developing gastric fundus varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy were evaluated. RESULTS Band ligation was performed in 34 (40%) patients and sclerotherapy in 51 (60%) patients. Esophageal varices were eradicated in 81.2%, after a median of four endoscopic sessions. Varices relapsed in 38 (55.1%) patients. Thirty-six (42.3%) patients experienced rebleeding, and it was more prevalent in the group that received sclerotherapy. Gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy developed in 38.7% and 57.9% of patients, respectively. Patients undergoing band ligation showed lower rebleeding rates (26.5% vs 52.9%) and fewer sessions required for eradication of esophageal varices (3.5 vs 5). CONCLUSION Secondary prophylaxis was effective in eradicating esophageal varices and controlling new upper gastrointestinal bleeding episodes due to the rupture of esophageal varices. Band ligation seems that resulted in lower rebleeding rates and fewer sessions required to eradicate varices than did sclerotherapy.

scholarly journals Clinical and endoscopic profile of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at tertiary care center of North India

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deep Anand ◽  
Rohit Gupta ◽  
Minakshi Dhar ◽  
Vivek Ahuja
Keyword(s):  
Peptic Ulcer ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
North India ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The presentation of bleeding depends on the amount and location of hemorrhage and the endoscopic profile varies according to different etiology. Despite advancements in medical intervention UGIB still carries considerable morbidity, mortality and economic burden on health care system. At present, there is limited epidemiological data on UGIB and associated mortality from India. Aims: The aim was to study clinical, endoscopic profile, and associated mortality in patients presenting with UGIB. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients came to Emergency Department with UGIB during the study period and were subjected to endoscopy to identify the etiology. The clinical and endoscopic profile was analyzed and mortality pattern was studied. Results: The mean age of patients was 49 ± 14.26. Majority of them were males (83.33%) and male to female ratio was 5:1. The most common cause of UGIB was portal hypertension related (Esophageal and gastric varices) seen in 56.14% of patients, peptic ulcer-related bleed was seen in 14.91% patients, gastric erosions were responsible for bleed in 12.28% patients, Mallory–Weiss tear was seen in 8.77% cases, gastric malignancy accounted for 4.38% of cases, Dieulafoy’s lesion was responsible for bleed in 1.75% cases and 1.75% had Duodenal polyp. The mortality rate because of UGIB in our cohort of patients was 21.05%. Conclusions: In the present study, variceal bleed was the most common cause of UGIB, followed by peptic ulcer bleed. Overall mortality was seen in 21.05% of cases; however, majority of mortality was seen in portal hypertension related bleeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document