scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 998-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Xiang ◽  
Anyuan Zhong ◽  
Tao You ◽  
Jianchang Chen ◽  
Weiting Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle-Branch Block in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Circulation ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 1139-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Melgarejo-Moreno ◽  
Jose Galcerá-Tomás ◽  
Arcadio García-Alberola ◽  
Mariano Valdés-Chavarri ◽  
Francisco J. Castillo-Soria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

Incidence and prognostic significance of right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic therapy

1997 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Melgarejo Moreno ◽  
Arcadi Garcı́a Alberola ◽  
José Galcerá Tomás ◽  
Mariano Valdés Chávarri ◽  
Francisco Castillo Soria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

The prognostic value of a new left bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart & Lung ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belal Al Rajoub ◽  
Samar Noureddine ◽  
Samer El Chami ◽  
Mohamad Hussein Haidar ◽  
Bachir Itani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
New Left ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

Abstract 14732: The Prognostic Implications of Right Bundle Branch Block in Healthy Population: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita Sharma ◽  
Ahmad Hazem ◽  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Cameron Leitch ◽  
Roopalakshmi Sharadanant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Objective: Multiple large population based observational studies have evaluated the association of various ECG changes with long term adverse outcomes demonstrating conflicting results regarding the significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of RBBB in healthy population. Methods: This systematic review follows an a priori established protocol and is reported following the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We systematically searched EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus through January 2014. We also consulted with content experts to recommend studies for screening. Reviewers working independently and in duplicate screened all eligible abstracts, selecting randomized trials and prospective cohort studies that described all cause mortality or cardiovascular death in patients with RBBB. We excluded studies that reported unadjusted outcome or unadjusted event rates. For statistical analysis, hazard ratios were considered to approximate risk ratios. The main outcomes of the study are all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Results: Based on the eligibility, four large cohorts, with total patient count > 100,000 were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and included studies were deemed to be of high quality. As demonstrated in Figure 1, RBBB was not associated increase in all-cause mortality (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.89-1.25) or cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.70-1.69). Conclusion: In asymptomatic healthy patients, RBBB is not associated with poor outcome.

scholarly journals Incidence and risk factors of delirium after percutaneous coronary intervention in individuals hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e044564
Author(s):  
Kaizhuang Huang ◽  
Jiaying Lu ◽  
Yaoli Zhu ◽  
Tao Cheng ◽  
Dahao Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

IntroductionDelirium in the postoperative period is a wide-reaching problem that affects important clinical outcomes. The incidence and risk factors of delirium in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been completely determined and no relevant systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence or risk factors exists. Hence, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the incidence and risk factors of delirium among AMI patients undergoing PCI.Methods and analysesWe will undertake a comprehensive literature search among PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Google Scholar from their inception to the search date. Prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies that described the incidence or at least one risk factor of delirium will be eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome will be the incidence of postoperative delirium. The quality of included studies will be assessed using a risk of bias tool for prevalence studies and the Cochrane guidelines. Heterogeneity of the estimates across studies will be assessed. Incidence and risk factors associated with delirium will be extracted. Incidence data will be pooled. Each risk factor reported in the included studies will be recorded together with its statistical significance; narrative and meta-analytical approaches will be employed. The systematic review and meta-analysis will be presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.Ethics and disseminationThis proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is based on published data, and thus there is no requirement for ethics approval. The study will provide an up to date and accurate incidence and risk factors of delirium after PCI among patients with AMI, which is necessary for future research in this area. The findings of this study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020184388.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document