scholarly journals Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 20130329 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Ibrahim ◽  
A Parsa ◽  
B Hassan ◽  
P van der Stelt ◽  
I H A Aartman ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norliza Ibrahim ◽  
Azin Parsa ◽  
Bassam Hassan ◽  
Paul der Stelt ◽  
Siti Mazlipah Ismail ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to compare the trabecular bone microstructures of anterior and posterior edentulous regions of human mandible using cone-beam CT (CBCT) and micro CT (µCT).Materials and methods Twenty volumes of interests consisting of six anterior and fourteen posterior edentulous regions were obtained from human mandibular cadavers. A CBCT system with a resolution of 80 µm (3D Accuitomo 170, J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and a µCT system with a resolution of 35 µm (SkyScan 1173, Kontich, Belgium) were used to scan the mandibles. Three structural parameters namely, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) were analysed using CTAn software (v 1.11, SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). For each system, the measurements obtained from anterior and posterior regions were tested using independent sample t-test. Subsequently, all measurements between systems were tested using paired t-test.Results In CBCT, all parameters of the anterior and posterior mandible showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). However, µCT showed a significant different of Tb.Th (p = 0.023) between anterior and posterior region. Regardless of regions, the measurements obtained using both imaging systems were significantly different (p ≤ 0.021) for Tb.Th and Tb.N.Conclusions The current study demonstrated that only the variation of Tb.Th between anterior and posterior edentulous region of mandible can be detected using micro CT. In addition, CBCT is less feasible than micro CT in assessing trabecular bone microstructures at both regions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aso Muhammad Ali Muhammad ◽  
Norliza Ibrahim ◽  
Rohana Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Khan Asif ◽  
Zamri Radzi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norliza Ibrahim ◽  
Azin Parsa ◽  
Bassam Hassan ◽  
Paul van der Stelt ◽  
Rabiah A. Rahmat ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the trabecular bone microstructures of anterior and posterior edentulous regions of human mandible using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and micro computed tomography (µCT). Methods Twenty volumes of interests consisting of six anterior and fourteen posterior edentulous regions were obtained from human mandibular cadavers. A CBCT system with a resolution of 80 µm (3D Accuitomo 170, J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and a µCT system with a resolution of 35 µm (SkyScan 1173, Kontich, Belgium) were used to scan the mandibles. Three structural parameters namely, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) were analysed using CTAn software (v 1.11, SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). For each system, the measurements obtained from anterior and posterior regions were tested using independent sample t-test. Subsequently, all measurements between systems were tested using paired t-test. Results In CBCT, all parameters of the anterior and posterior mandible showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). However, µCT showed a significant different of Tb.Th (p = 0.023) between anterior and posterior region. Regardless of regions, the measurements obtained using both imaging systems were significantly different (p ≤ 0.021) for Tb.Th and Tb.N. Conclusions The current study demonstrated that only the variation of Tb.Th between anterior and posterior edentulous region of mandible can be detected using µCT. In addition, CBCT is less feasible than µCT in assessing trabecular bone microstructures at both regions.


2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyasu Mochizuki ◽  
Noriyuki Sugino ◽  
Tadashi Ninomiya ◽  
Nobuo Yoshinari ◽  
Nobuyuki Udagawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document