scholarly journals The difference in dose and image quality between magnification methods used after the introduction of larger 60-inch operator screens

BJR|Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 20190044
Author(s):  
Hywel Mortimer-Roberts ◽  
Michael R Rees
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Communication Systems ◽  
Image Resolution ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Test Tool ◽  
Reduce Radiation Dose ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Picture Archiving And Communication ◽  
Area Product

Objective: To determine whether the use of display matrix magnification on larger operator screens without the use of conventional magnification can reduce radiation dose to the patient, and what effect it would have on image quality. Methods: The kerma-area product (KAP) resulting from standard projections in cardiac angiography were measured when an anthropomorphic phantom was imaged using conventional magnification method and display matrix magnification. The image quality was also evaluated by three observers using a TOR 18FG test tool for both magnification method. Results: The mean radiation KAP for the seven views with conventional magnification was 36.65 µGy m−2 whilst a reduction in KAP of 20.4% is possible using display matrix magnification (p < 0.05). The image resolution during acquisition was identical between both methods and only slightly reduced for the display matrix (1.6 LP mm−1) compared to conventional magnification (1.8 LP mm−1) when images were stored and retrieved on a Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) system. Both methods retained the same low-contrast detectability to PACS, with only a slight increase in detectability of 18 for display matrix magnification compared to 17 for conventional. Conclusion: Using display matrix magnification instead of conventional equipment magnification significantly reduces radiation does in all standard cardiac views without reducing image quality for the operator. This reduction in radiation dose is significant (p < 0.05) for the patients. The resolution did not change during acquisition, but contrast improved slightly (0.9% threshold contrast), but lost resolution of 0.2 LP mm−1 when archived to PACS. Advances in knowledge: This is a new method of reducing significant dose to the patient during cardiology examinations and may encourage further studies in other fluoroscopy lead examination to see if it could work for them.

A Systematic Review of Double Low-dose CT Pulmonary Angiography in Pulmonary Embolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sultan Aldosari ◽  
Zhonghua Sun
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Contrast Medium ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pulmonary Angiography ◽  
Ct Pulmonary Angiography ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Low Contrast Medium

Background: The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the feasibility and clinical application of double low-dose CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Discussion: A total of 13 studies were found to meet selection criteria reporting both low radiation dose (70 or 80 kVp versus 100 or 120 kVp) and low contrast medium dose CTPA protocols. Lowdose CTPA resulted in radiation dose reduction from 29.6% to 87.5% in 12 studies (range: 0.4 to 23.5 mSv), while in one study, radiation dose was increased in the dual-energy CT group when compared to the standard 120 kVp group. CTPA with use of low contrast medium volume (range: 20 to 75 ml) was compared to standard CTPA (range: 50 to 101 ml) in 12 studies with reduction between 25 and 67%, while in the remaining study, low iodine concentration was used with 23% dose reduction achieved. Quantitative assessment of image quality (in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio) showed that low-dose CTPA was associated with higher, lower and no change in image quality in 3, 3 and 6 studies, respectively when compared to the standard CTPA protocol. The subjective assessment indicated similar image quality in 11 studies between low-dose and standard CTPA groups, and improved image quality in 1 study with low-dose CTPA. Conclusion: This review shows that double low-dose CTPA is feasible in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with significant reductions in both radiation and contrast medium doses, without compromising diagnostic image quality.

Predictors of radiation dose for uterine artery embolisation are angiography system-dependent

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Johnson Nocum ◽  
John Robinson ◽  
Mark Halaki ◽  
Magnus Bath ◽  
John D. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Uterine Artery ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Uterine Artery Embolisation ◽  
System A ◽  
Group I ◽  
Reduce Radiation Dose ◽  
Area Product ◽  
Dose Measurements ◽  
Mlr Model

Abstract This study sought to achieve radiation dose reductions for patients receiving uterine artery embolisation (UAE) by evaluating radiation dose measurements for the preceding generation (Allura) and upgraded (Azurion) angiography system. Previous UAE regression models in the literature could not be applied to this centre’s practice due to being based on different angiography systems and radiation dose predictor variables. The aims of this study were to establish whether radiation dose is reduced with the upgraded angiography system and to develop a regression model to determine predictors of radiation dose specific to the upgraded angiography system. A comparison between Group I (Allura, n = 95) and Group II (Azurion, n = 95) demonstrated a significant reduction in KAP (kerma-area product) and Ka, r (reference air kerma) by 63% (143.2 Gy·cm2 vs 52.9 Gy·cm2; P < 0.001, d = 0.8) and 67% (0.6 Gy vs 0.2 Gy; P < 0.001, d = 0.8), respectively. The multivariable linear regression (MLR) model identified the UAE radiation dose predictors for KAP on the upgraded angiography system as total fluoroscopy dose, Ka, r, and total uterus volume. The predictive accuracy of the MLR model was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot. The mean difference was 0.39 Gy·cm2 and the limits of agreement (LoA) were +28.49 and -27.71 Gy·cm2, and thus illustrated no proportional bias. Our findings validated the upgraded angiography system and its advance capabilities to significantly reduce radiation dose for our patients. Interventional radiologist and interventional radiographer familiarisation of the system’s features and the implementation of the newly established MLR model would further facilitate dose optimisation for all centres performing UAE procedures using the upgraded angiography system.

scholarly journals Feasibility of low-dose digital pulsed video-fluoroscopic swallow exams (VFSE): effects on radiation dose and image quality

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1037-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Weiss ◽  
Mike Notohamiprodjo ◽  
Klement Neumaier ◽  
Minglun Li ◽  
Wilhelm Flatz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Diagnostic Image Quality ◽  
Organ Doses ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Thermoluminescent Dosimeters ◽  
Area Product

Background Fluoroscopy is a frequently used examination in clinical routine without appropriate research evaluation latest hardware and software equipment. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of low-dose pulsed video-fluoroscopic swallowing exams (pVFSE) to reduce dose exposure in patients with swallowing disorders compared to high-resolution radiograph examinations (hrVFSE) serving as standard of reference. Material and Methods A phantom study (Alderson-Rando Phantom, 60 thermoluminescent dosimeters [TLD]) was performed for dose measurements. Acquisition parameters were as follows: (i) pVFSE: 76.7 kV, 57 mA, 0.9 Cu mm, pulse rate/s 30; (ii) hrVFSE: 68.0 kV, 362 mA, 0.2 Cu mm, pictures 30/s. The dose area product (DAP) indicated by the detector system and the radiation dose derived from the TLD measurements were analyzed. In a patient study, image quality was assessed qualitatively (5-point Likert scale, 5 = hrVFSE; two independent readers) and quantitatively (SNR) in 35 patients who subsequently underwent contrast-enhanced pVFSE and hrVFSE. Results Phantom measurements showed a dose reduction per picture of factor 25 for pVFSE versus hrVFSE images (0.0025 mGy versus 0.062 mGy). The DAP (µGym2) was 28.0 versus 810.5 (pVFSE versus hrVFSE) for an average examination time of 30 s. Direct and scattered organ doses were significantly lower for pVFSE as compared to hrVFSE ( P < 0.05). Image quality was rated 3.9 ± 0.5 for pVFSE versus the hrVFSE standard; depiction of the contrast agent 4.8 ± 0.3; noise 3.6 ± 0.5 ( P < 0.05); SNR calculations revealed a relative decreased of 43.9% for pVFSE as compared to hrVFSE. Conclusion Pulsed VFSE is feasible, providing diagnostic image quality at a significant dose reduction as compared to hrVFSE.

scholarly journals Numerical evaluation of image parameters of ETR-1

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 489-491
Author(s):  
Shamim Ahmed ◽  
Marian Krüger ◽  
Christian Willomitzer ◽  
Golam A. Zakaria
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Numerical Evaluation ◽  
Numerical Estimation ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Precise Result ◽  
Test Tool ◽  
Naked Eye ◽  
Pre Treatment

AbstractIn this work, we developed a method to handle the image quality test-tool precisely. This test-tool is important to evaluate the quality of the medical images for pre-treatment planning phase. But the achieved images are estimated by naked eyes, which does not provide the precise result. Our main goal is to get the desired image parameters numerically. This numerical estimation overcomes the limitation of naked eye observation. Hence, it enhances the pre-treatment planning. The ETR-1 test-tool is considered here. The contrast, the low contrast details and line-pairs (lp/mm) were estimated.

scholarly journals New patient-controlled abdominal compression method in radiography: radiation dose and image quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 205846011877286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oili Piippo-Huotari ◽  
Eva Norrman ◽  
Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson ◽  
Håkan Geijer
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Abdominal Compression ◽  
Radiographic Images ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Similar Dose ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Area Product

Background The radiation dose for patients can be reduced with many methods and one way is to use abdominal compression. In this study, the radiation dose and image quality for a new patient-controlled compression device were compared with conventional compression and compression in the prone position . Purpose To compare radiation dose and image quality of patient-controlled compression compared with conventional and prone compression in general radiography. Material and Methods An experimental design with quantitative approach. After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee, a consecutive sample of 48 patients was examined with the standard clinical urography protocol. The radiation doses were measured as dose-area product and analyzed with a paired t-test. The image quality was evaluated by visual grading analysis. Four radiologists evaluated each image individually by scoring nine criteria modified from the European quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Results There was no significant difference in radiation dose or image quality between conventional and patient-controlled compression. Prone position resulted in both higher dose and inferior image quality. Conclusion Patient-controlled compression gave similar dose levels as conventional compression and lower than prone compression. Image quality was similar with both patient-controlled and conventional compression and was judged to be better than in the prone position.

scholarly journals Studies on the radiation dose, image quality and low contrast detectability from MSCT abdomen by using low tube voltage

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mokhtar ◽  
Z. A. Aabdelbary ◽  
A. Sarhan ◽  
H. M. Gad ◽  
M. T. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Image Noise ◽  
Tube Voltage ◽  
Current Time ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Low Tube Voltage ◽  
Tube Current ◽  
Noise Ratio

Abstract Background To study radiation dose, image quality and low-contrast cylinder detectability from multislice CT (MSCT) abdomen by using low tube voltage using the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. The ACR phantom (low-contrast module) was scanned with 64 MSCT scanner (Brilliance, Philips Medical System, Eindhoven, Netherlands) with 80 and 120 KVP, utilizing different tube current time product (mAs) range from 50 to 380 mAs. The image noise (SD), signal to noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and scores of low contrast detectability were assessed for every image respectively. Results From images analyses, the noise essentially increased with the use of low tube voltage. The CNR was 0.94 ± 0.27 at 120 KVP, and CNR was 0.43 ± 0.22 at 80 KVP. However, with the same dose, there were no differences of statistical significance in scores of low-contrast detectability between 120 KVP at 300mAs and 80 KVP at (200–380) mAs (p > 0.05). At 300 mAs, the CTDIvol obtained at 80 KVP was about 29% of that at 120 KVP. The CTDIvol obtained at 80 KVP were decreased from 5% at 50 mAs, to 37% at 380 mAs. Conclusions There is a possibility to decrease exposure of radiation virtually by reducing KVP from 120 to 80 KVP in examination of abdominal CT when the high tube current is used, though increasing image noise at low tube voltage.

scholarly journals Quantifying the Utility of Low Resolution Brain Imaging:: Treatment of Infant Hydrocephalus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Harper ◽  
Venkateswararao Cherukuri ◽  
Tom O'Riley ◽  
Mingzhao Yu ◽  
Edith Mbabazi-Kabachelor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Image Resolution ◽  
Learning Enhancement ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Substantial Risk ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Hydrocephalus Treatment ◽  
Post Hoc

As low-field MRI technology is being disseminated into clinical settings, it is important to assess the image quality required to properly diagnose and treat a given disease. In this post-hoc analysis of an ongoing randomized clinical trial, we assessed the diagnostic utility of reduced-quality and deep learning enhanced images for hydrocephalus treatment planning. Images were degraded in terms of resolution, noise, and contrast between brain and CSF and enhanced using deep learning algorithms. Both degraded and enhanced images were presented to three experienced pediatric neurosurgeons accustomed to working in LMIC for assessment of clinical utility in treatment planning for hydrocephalus. Results indicate that image resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio between brain and CSF predict the likelihood of a useful image for hydrocephalus treatment planning. For images with 128x128 resolution, a contrast-to-noise ratio of 2.5 has a high probability of being useful (91%, 95% CI 73% to 96%; P=2e-16). Deep learning enhancement of a 128x128 image with very low contrast-to-noise (1.5) and low probability of being useful (23%, 95% CI 14% to 36%; P=2e-16) increases CNR improving the apparent likelihood of being useful, but carries substantial risk of structural errors leading to misleading clinical interpretation (CNR after enhancement = 5; risk of misleading results = 21%, 95% CI 3% to 32%; P=7e-11). Lower quality images not customarily considered acceptable by clinicians can be useful in planning hydrocephalus treatment. We find substantial risk of misleading structural errors when using deep learning enhancement of low quality images. These findings advocate for new standards in assessing acceptable image quality for clinical use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document