scholarly journals Biopsy of palliative lesions following radiotherapy

BJR|Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 20180025
Author(s):  
Shiro Fujita ◽  
Katsuhiro Masago ◽  
Yasushi Yatabe

Objective: Definite radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy is often conducted for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, there is a potential concern regarding the mutagenic effects on tumor cells derived from the therapies, and genomic information regarding cancer cells that survived definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy is lacking. To evaluate the mutagenic effect of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, we compared genomic signatures of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer tissue with those of pre-treatment. Methods: We evaluated seven specimens from three patients who developed disease recurrence after definite radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, and we ranked the mutations according to the Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion score. Results: Some mutations remained in the post-therapy state, and others, including driver mutations, either newly occurred or disappeared during the course of disease. Of the four specimens obtained in the post-radiation period, 21 variants were detected. Compared with single nucleotide substitution (5, 23.8%), substantial number of deletions (16, 76.2%) was observed in specimens obtained after definite radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion: Radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy effects on tumor cells have a wide spectrum, and resequencing of a recurrent lesion is always recommended to discuss the best course of therapy for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer after definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy. Advances in knowledge: With regard to cancer cells that survived definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, some mutations remained in the post-therapy state, and others, including driver mutations, either newly occurred or disappeared during the course of disease. Compared with single nucleotide substitution, substantial number of deletions was observed in specimens obtained after definite radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Henrique Araujo ◽  
Bianca Mendes Souza ◽  
Laura Rabelo Leite ◽  
Sabrina A. F. Parma ◽  
Natália P. Lopes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer, however efforts to develop targeted therapies have been largely unsuccessful. Recently, two small-molecule inhibitors, AMG 510 and MRTX849, have shown promising activity in KRAS G12C-mutant solid tumors. The current study aims to assess the molecular profile of KRAS G12C in colorectal (CRC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tested in a clinical certified laboratory. Methods CRC and NSCLC samples submitted for KRAS testing between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed. CRC samples were tested for KRAS and NRAS by pyrosequencing, while NSCLC samples were submitted to next generation sequencing of KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, and BRAF. Results The dataset comprised 4897 CRC and 4686 NSCLC samples. Among CRC samples, KRAS was mutated in 2354 (48.1%). Most frequent codon 12 mutations were G12D in 731 samples (14.9%) and G12V in 522 (10.7%), followed by G12C in 167 (3.4%). KRAS mutations were more frequent in females than males (p = 0.003), however this difference was exclusive of non-G12C mutants (p < 0.001). KRAS mutation frequency was lower in the South and North regions (p = 0.003), but again KRAS G12C did not differ significantly (p = 0.80). In NSCLC, KRAS mutations were found in 1004 samples (21.4%). As opposed to CRC samples, G12C was the most common mutation in KRAS, in 346 cases (7.4%). The frequency of KRAS G12C was higher in the South and Southeast regions (p = 0.012), and lower in patients younger than 50 years (p < 0.001). KRAS G12C mutations were largely mutually exclusive with other driver mutations; only 11 NSCLC (3.2%) and 1 CRC (0.6%) cases had relevant co-mutations. Conclusions KRAS G12C presents in frequencies higher than several other driver mutations, and may represent a large volume of patients in absolute numbers. KRAS testing should be considered in all CRC and NSCLC patients, independently of clinical or demographic characteristics.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz H. Araujo ◽  
Bianca Souza ◽  
Laura Leite ◽  
Sabrina Parma ◽  
Natália Lopes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer, however efforts to develop targeted therapies have been largely unsuccessful. Recently, two small-molecule inhibitors, AMG 510 and MRTX849, have shown promising activity in KRAS G12C-mutant solid tumors. The current study aims to assess the molecular profile of KRAS G12C in colorectal (CRC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tested in a clinical certified laboratory.Methods: CRC and NSCLC samples submitted for KRAS testing between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed. CRC samples were tested for KRAS and NRAS by pyrosequencing, while NSCLC samples were submitted to next generation sequencing of KRAS, NRAS, EGFR, and BRAF. Results: The dataset comprised 4,897 CRC and 4,686 NSCLC samples. Among CRC samples, KRAS was mutated in 2,354 (48.1%). Most frequent codon 12 mutations were G12D in 731 samples (15.2%) and G12V in 462 (9.6%), followed by G12C in 167 (3.4%). KRAS mutations were more frequent in females than males (p=0.003), however this difference was exclusive of non-G12C mutants (p<0.001). KRAS mutation frequency was lower in the South and North regions (p=0.003), but again KRAS G12C did not differ significantly (p=0.80). In NSCLC, KRAS mutations were found in 1,004 samples (21.4%). As opposed to CRC samples, G12C was the most common mutation in KRAS, in 346 cases (7.4%). The frequency of KRAS G12C was higher in the South and Southeast regions (p=0.012), and lower in patients younger than 50 years (p<0.001). KRAS G12C mutations were largely mutually exclusive with other driver mutations; only 11 NSCLC (3.2%) and 3 CRC (1.8%) cases had relevant co-mutations. Conclusions: KRAS G12C presents in frequencies higher than several other driver mutations, represent a large volume of patients in absolute numbers. KRAS testing should be considered in all CRC and NSCLC patients, independently of clinical or demographic characteristics.


Author(s):  
Ruby Gupta ◽  
Melanie Smalley ◽  
Nwabundo Anusim ◽  
Vishal Jindal ◽  
Mandeep Singh Rahi ◽  
...  

Background: Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in the US. The use of precision medicine in the past 10 years has significantly changed the therapeutic landscape of lung cancer. Management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transitioned from a chemotherapeutic approach to targeted treatments and immunotherapeutic agents. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for patients with targeted mutations while patients who do not have driver mutations; immunotherapy has been recently approved as frontline therapy, which has resulted in marked improvement in overall survival and added a new tool in our armamentarium. Aims: The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advancements in diagnostic approach and management strategies in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Materials and methods: Published studies included in Medline (via PubMed) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines were reviewed for data gathering. Conclusion: The use of next generation sequencing has significantly changed our understanding of molecular oncogenic mechanisms of lung cancer. These advancements have created a paradigm shift in the treatment strategies of metastatic lung cancer from primarily chemotherapeutic approach to increasing use of targeted therapies and immune check point inhibitors (ICI) leading to better survival rates and lesser toxicity.


Author(s):  
Kristin A. Higgins ◽  
Sonam Puri ◽  
Jhanelle E. Gray

The treatment for locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer has changed dramatically over the past several years, with consolidative immunotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation becoming the new standard of care. Five-year survival outcomes have substantially improved with this approach. Despite these advances, further improvements are needed as the majority of patients ultimately develop progression of disease. The next-generation immunotherapy trials are currently being conducted that include approaches such as concurrent immunotherapy and addition of other therapeutic agents in the concurrent and consolidative settings. Specific unmet needs continue to exist for patients who develop disease progression after concurrent chemoradiation and immunotherapy, as well as defining the best treatment for patients with driver mutations. Future directions also include refinement of radiation techniques to reduce toxicities as much as possible, as well as the use of circulating tumor DNA in the surveillance setting. The current scientific landscape shows promising approaches that may further improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer.


Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (40) ◽  
pp. 26195-26208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Nyrop Jakobsen ◽  
Eric Santoni-Rugiu ◽  
Morten Grauslund ◽  
Linea Melchior ◽  
Jens Benn Sørensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document