scholarly journals Magnetic resonance enterography features of small bowel Crohn’s disease activity: an inter-rater reliability study of small bowel active inflammation in clinical practice setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1099) ◽  
pp. 20180930
Author(s):  
Richard Tsai ◽  
Aaron Mintz ◽  
Michael Lin ◽  
Joyce Mhlanga ◽  
Adeeti Chiplunker ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the interrater agreement in a clinical practice environment for the most commonly used magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) features of Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: CD patients with MRE’s before and after treatment were retrospectively identified using search queries over a 7-year period (May 2017–September 2017). MRE features of CD comprising components of multiple CD scoring indices were scored by radiologists in the same segment of bowel. Agreement for nominal categorical and continuous variables was assessed using a κ and interclass correlation coefficients, respectively. Results: 80 scans comprised the study population. Moderate interrater agreement was seen in both the pre- and post-treatment MRE’s for presence of diffusion restriction (к = 0.43, 0.48; pre- and post-treatment), stricturing disease (к = 0.51, 0.52), overall degree of severity (к = 0.49, 0.59). Substantial agreement was seen in pre- and post-treatment scans for length of involvement (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.67, 0.61). The presence of mucosal ulceration had no agreement (к = −0.07, –0.042). Conclusion: Many MRE features of active CD comprising the major CD scoring indices are reproducible when interpreted by non-CD focused abdominal radiologists. However, the presence of mucosal ulcerations had no agreement and may need more investigation before including this feature as a driver in therapeutic decision making. Advances in knowledge: Demonstrates the unreliability of mucosal ulceration by non-CD focused abdominal radiologists, targeting a potential area for future education. Key Points The majority of MRE findings incorporated in to many CD scoring indices have fair to moderate inter-rater agreement even when read by non-MRE expert radiologists. Substantial agreement was seen in the length of involved bowel, but this feature is only incorporated in to one of the CD scoring indices. Presence of mucosal ulcerations had no interrater agreement in our study—a feature which is heavily weighted by several CD scoring indices. Research should be focused bridging those features which have poor interrater agreement.

2012 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. S-169
Author(s):  
Danny Cheriyan ◽  
Eoin Slattery ◽  
Shaunagh McDermott ◽  
Aoife Kilcoyne ◽  
Denise Keegan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000365 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Henry Bruining ◽  
Salvatore Oliva ◽  
Mark R Fleisher ◽  
Monika Fischer ◽  
Joel G Fletcher

IntroductionCrohn’s disease diagnosis and monitoring remains a great clinical challenge and often requires multiple testing modalities. Assessing Crohn’s disease activity in the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract using a panenteric capsule endoscopy (CE) system could be used as an alternative to colonoscopy and cross-sectional imaging. This study assessed the accuracy and safety of panenteric CE in Crohn’s disease as compared with ileocolonoscopy (IC) and/or magnetic resonance enterography (MRE).MethodsA prospective, multicentre study was performed in subjects with established Crohn’s disease. Individuals with proven small bowel patency underwent a standardised bowel preparation, followed by CE ingestion and IC either the same or following day. MRE, IC, and CE interpretations were performed by blinded central readers using validated scoring systems. The primary endpoint was the overall sensitivity of CE vs MRE and/or IC in Crohn’s disease subjects.ResultsStudy enrolment included 158 subjects from 21 sites in the USA, Austria, and Israel. Of those, 99 were included in the analysis. Imaging modality scores indicated none to mild inflammation in the proximal small bowel and colon, but discrepant levels of inflammation in the terminal ileum. Overall sensitivity for active enteric inflammation (CE vs MRE and/or IC) was 94% vs 100% (p=0.125) and specificity was 74% vs 22% (p=0.001). Sensitivity of CE was superior to MRE for enteric inflammation in the proximal small bowel (97% vs 71%, p=0.021), and similar to MRE and/or IC in the terminal ileum and colon (p=0.500–0.625). There were seven serious adverse advents of which three were related to the CE device.ConclusionPanenteric CE is a reliable tool for assessing Crohn’s disease mucosal activity and extent compared with more invasive methods. This study demonstrates high performance of the panenteric CE as compared to MRE and/or IC without the need for multiple tests in non-stricturing Crohn’s disease.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov NCT03241368


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document