Does Ignorance of Economic Returns Explain the Educational Aspiration Gap? Evidence from Representative Survey Experiments among Adolescents

Author(s):  
Elisabeth Grewenig
2020 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 101876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cattaneo ◽  
Philipp Lergetporer ◽  
Guido Schwerdt ◽  
Katharina Werner ◽  
Ludger Woessmann ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Lergetporer ◽  
Guido Schwerdt ◽  
Katharina Werner ◽  
Ludger Woessmann

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Alejandra Cattaneo ◽  
Philipp Lergetporer ◽  
Guido Schwerdt ◽  
Katharina Werner ◽  
Ludger Woessmann ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. eaaw7449 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Carey ◽  
Victoria Chi ◽  
D. J. Flynn ◽  
Brendan Nyhan ◽  
Thomas Zeitzoff

Disease epidemics and outbreaks often generate conspiracy theories and misperceptions that mislead people about the risks they face and how best to protect themselves. We investigate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at combating false and unsupported information about the Zika epidemic and subsequent yellow fever outbreak in Brazil. Results from a nationally representative survey show that conspiracy theories and other misperceptions about Zika are widely believed. Moreover, results from three preregistered survey experiments suggest that efforts to counter misperceptions about diseases during epidemics and outbreaks may not always be effective. We find that corrective information not only fails to reduce targeted Zika misperceptions but also reduces the accuracy of other beliefs about the disease. In addition, although corrective information about the better-known threat from yellow fever was more effective, none of these corrections affected support for vector control policies or intentions to engage in preventive behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document