Optimal Income Taxation with Unemployment and Wage Responses: A Sufficient Statistics Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 254-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kory Kroft ◽  
Kavan Kucko ◽  
Etienne Lehmann ◽  
Johannes Schmieder

We derive a sufficient statistics tax formula in a model that incorporates unemployment and endogenous wages to study the shape of the optimal income tax. Key sufficient statistics are the macro employment response to taxation, the micro and macro participation response to taxation, and the wage-moderating effect of tax progressivity. We empirically implement the tax formula by estimating the micro and macro elasticities using policy variation from the United States. Our results suggest that the optimal tax more closely resembles a negative income tax than an earned income tax credit relative to the case where unemployment and wage responses are ignored. (JEL E24, H21, H23, H24, H31, J22, J31)

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A Moffitt

The negative income tax proposed by Milton Friedman represents one of the fundamental ideas of modern welfare policy. However, the academic literature has raised two difficulties with it, one challenging its purported work incentives and the other suggesting the possible superiority of work requirements. In addition, work requirement approaches have gained ground in actual U.S. welfare policy over the last 30 years and the number of different programs has proliferated, another development counter to the negative income tax. On the other hand, the Earned Income Tax Credit has produced a negative-income-tax-like program on a vast scale.


2019 ◽  
pp. 95-124
Author(s):  
Peter Sloman

The 1960s witnessed a revival of concern about poverty on both sides of the Atlantic. One of the most fashionable responses to this ‘rediscovery of poverty’ in the United States was the concept of a Negative Income Tax, which Milton Friedman popularized in Capitalism and Freedom (1962). Much of the literature on the US guaranteed income debate presents NIT as a distinctively American phenomenon, but the possibility of integrating tax and benefits in this way was also central to British social policy during the 1960s and 1970s. Both Conservative and Labour governments hoped that NIT could allow them to target benefits on the poor without the stigma of conventional means-testing—focusing first on pensioners, then on working families with children. The idea attracted wide attention inside and outside government, but ran up against both cultural resistance to wage supplements and technical difficulties in paying benefits through the PAYE system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document