scholarly journals Screening in Contract Design: Evidence from the ACA Health Insurance Exchanges

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Geruso ◽  
Timothy Layton ◽  
Daniel Prinz

We study insurers’ use of prescription drug formularies to screen consumers in the ACA Health Insurance exchanges. We begin by showing that exchange risk adjustment and reinsurance succeed in neutralizing selection incentives for most, but not all, consumer types. A minority of consumers, identifiable by demand for particular classes of prescription drugs, are predictably unprofitable. We then show that contract features relating to these drugs are distorted in a manner consistent with multidimensional screening. The empirical findings support a long theoretical literature examining how insurance contracts offered in equilibrium can fail to optimally trade off risk protection and moral hazard. (JEL D82, G22, H51, I13, I18)

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 692-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Eekhoff ◽  
Markus Jankowski ◽  
Anne Zimmermann

2012 ◽  
Vol 169 (7) ◽  
pp. 704-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen L. Barry ◽  
Jonathan P. Weiner ◽  
Klaus Lemke ◽  
Susan H. Busch

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Zweifel ◽  
Michael Breuer

Uniform, risk-independent insurance premiums are accepted as part of ‘managed competition’ in health care. However, they are not compatible with optimality of health insurance contracts in the presence of both ex ante and ex post moral hazard. They have adverse effects on insurer behaviour even if risk adjustment is taken into account. Risk-based premiums combined with means-tested, tax-financed transfers are advocated as an alternative.


Author(s):  
Jan Abel Olsen

This chapter seeks to explain why most people prefer to have a health insurance plan. Two types of uncertainty give rise to the demand for financial protection: people do not know if they will ever come to need healthcare, and they do not know the full financial implications of illness. Health insurance would take away—or at least reduce—such financial uncertainties associated with future illnesses. A model is presented to show the so-called welfare gain from health insurance. This is followed by an investigation into the potential efficiency losses of health insurance, due to excess demand for services. In the last section, a different efficiency problem is discussed: when people have an incentive to signal ‘false risks’, this can lead to there being no market for insurance contracts which reflect ‘true risks’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document