scholarly journals Referrals: Peer Screening and Enforcement in a Consumer Credit Field Experiment

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gharad Bryan ◽  
Dean Karlan ◽  
Jonathan Zinman
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Field Experiment ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Consumer Credit ◽  
Social Pressure ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Ex Ante

Empirical evidence on peer intermediation lags behind both theory and practice in which lenders use peers to mitigate adverse selection and moral hazard. Using a referral incentive under individual liability, we develop a two-stage field experiment that permits separate identification of peer screening and enforcement. Our key contribution is to allow for borrower heterogeneity in both ex ante repayment type and ex post susceptibility to social pressure. Our method allows identification of selection on repayment likelihood, selection on susceptibility to social pressure, and loan enforcement. Implementing our method in South Africa we find no evidence of screening but large enforcement effects. (JEL D14, D82, G21, O12, O16)

scholarly journals Optimal Contract under Moral Hazard with Soft Information

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Roger
Keyword(s):  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Soft Information ◽  
Optimal Contract ◽  
Strategic Complements ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Ex Ante

I study a model of moral hazard with soft information: the agent alone observes the stochastic outcome of her action; hence the principal faces a problem of ex post adverse selection. With limited instruments the principal cannot solve these two problems independently; the ex post incentive for misreporting interacts with the ex ante incentives for effort. This affects the shape and properties of the optimal contract, which fails to elicit truthful revelation in all states. In this setup audit and transfer become strategic complements; this is rooted in the nonseparability of the problem. (JEL D82, D86)

scholarly journals Information Asymmetries in Consumer Credit Markets: Evidence from Payday Lending

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will Dobbie ◽  
Paige Marta Skiba
Keyword(s):  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Regression Discontinuity ◽  
Credit Markets ◽  
Consumer Credit ◽  
Probability Of Default ◽  
Information Asymmetries ◽  
Payday Lending ◽  
Loan Market ◽  
Payday Loans

Information asymmetries are prominent in theory but difficult to estimate. This paper exploits discontinuities in loan eligibility to test for moral hazard and adverse selection in the payday loan market. Regression discontinuity and regression kink approaches suggest that payday borrowers are less likely to default on larger loans. A $50 larger payday loan leads to a 17 to 33 percent drop in the probability of default. Conversely, there is economically and statistically significant adverse selection into larger payday loans when loan eligibility is held constant. Payday borrowers who choose a $50 larger loan are 16 to 47 percent more likely to default. (JEL D14, D82, G21)

Corporate Governance in Business and Management

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik E. Lehmann
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Political Systems ◽  
Exogenous Shock ◽  
Specific Investments ◽  
Academic Fields ◽  
Relevant Stakeholder ◽  
Interdisciplinary Concept

Corporate governance is a recent concept that encompasses the costs caused by managerial misbehavior. It is concerned with how organizations in general, and corporations in particular, produce value and how that value is distributed among the members of the corporation, its stakeholders. The interrelation of value production and value distribution links the ubiquitous technological aspect (the production of value) with the moral and ethical dimension (the distribution of value). Corporate governance is concerned with this link in general, but more specifically with the moral and ethical dimensions of distributing the generated value among the stakeholders. Value in firms is created by firm-specific investments, and the motivation and coordination of value-enhancing activities and investment is protected by the power concentrated at the pyramidal top of the organization. In modern companies, it is the CEO and the top management who decide how to create value and how to distribute it among the relevant stakeholders. Due to asymmetric information and the imperfect nature of markets and contracts, adverse selection and moral hazard problems occur, where delegated (selected) managers could act in their own interest at the costs of other relevant stakeholders. Corporate governance can be understood as a two-tailed concept. The first aspect is about identifying the (most) relevant stakeholder(s), separating theory and practice into two different and conflicting streams: the stakeholder value approach and the shareholder value approach. The second aspect of the concept is about providing and analyzing different mechanisms, reducing the costs induced by moral hazard and adverse selection effects, and balancing out the motivation and coordination problems of the relevant stakeholders. Corporate governance is an interdisciplinary concept encompassing academic fields such as finance, economics, accounting, law, taxation, and psychology, among others. As countries differ according to their institutions (i.e., legal and political systems, norms, and rules), firms differ according to their size, age, dominant shareholders, or industries. Thus, concepts in corporate governance differ along these dimensions as well. And while the underlying characteristics vary in time, continuously or as a result of an exogenous shock, concepts in corporate governance are dynamic and static, offering a challenging field of interest for academics, policymakers, and firm managers.

scholarly journals Moral Hazard Effects of Corporate Bond Guarantee Purchases: Empirical Evidence from China

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (5(J)) ◽  
pp. 100-115
Author(s):  
Xueying Zhang ◽  
Shansheng Gao ◽  
Jian Jiao
Keyword(s):  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Credit Rating ◽  
Bond Market ◽  
Corporate Bond ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Corporate Bond Market ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Better Than

This study examines corporate bond guarantees by developing a theoretical model that decomposes the overall impact of a guarantee into signalling and incentive effects and presenting empirical evidence based on data from China’s corporate bond market. Our empirical research yields considerable evidence for the effects we posit in the model and provides some important insights into the problems of adverse selection and moral hazard in China’s bond market. The empirical evidence shows that the bond issuer with lower credit rating are more willing to purchase a bond guarantee and guaranteed bonds have a higher issue spread yield than those non-guaranteed bonds, even though both have the same bond credit rating. Our findings suggest that moral hazard would be better than adverse selection to explain the self- selection of bond guarantees. Prior to bond issuance credit rating signal provides a mechanism to mitigate information inequality, while bond guarantees relieve information asymmetry afterwards. 

Epsilon-Efficiency in a Dynamic Partnership with Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vi Cao
Keyword(s):  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Adverse Selection ◽  
Incentive Compatibility ◽  
Current Effort ◽  
Bayesian Equilibrium ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Division Rule ◽  
Dynamic Partnership ◽  
Division Mechanism

Abstract For a dynamic partnership with adverse selection and moral hazard, we design a direct profit division mechanism that satisfies ϵ-efficiency, periodic Bayesian incentive compatibility, interim individual rationality, and ex-post budget balance. In addition, we design a voting mechanism that implements the profit division rule associated with this direct mechanism in perfect Bayesian equilibrium. For establishing these possibility results, we assume that the partnership exhibits intertemporal complementarities instead of contemporaneous complementarities; equivalently, an agent’s current effort affects other agents’ future optimal efforts instead of current optimal efforts. This modelling assumption fits a wide range of economic settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document