scholarly journals Sovereign Debt and Structural Reforms

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (12) ◽  
pp. 4220-4259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Müller ◽  
Kjetil Storesletten ◽  
Fabrizio Zilibotti

We construct a dynamic theory of sovereign debt and structural reforms with limited enforcement and moral hazard. A sovereign country in recession wishes to smooth consumption. It can also undertake costly reforms to speed up recovery. The sovereign can renege on contracts by suffering a stochastic cost. The constrained optimal allocation (COA) prescribes imperfect insurance with non-monotonic dynamics for consumption and effort. The COA is decentralized by a competitive equilibrium with markets for renegotiable GDP-linked one-period debt. The equilibrium features debt overhang: reform effort decreases in a high debt range. We also consider environments with less complete markets. (JEL D82, E21, E23, E32, F34, H63)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (34) ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrvin Anthony ◽  
Gregorio Impavido ◽  
Bert van Selm

This paper examines the causes, processes, and outcomes of Barbados’ 2018–19 sovereign debt restructuring—its first ever. The restructuring was comprehensive, featuring several rarely used approaches, including the restructuring of treasury bills, and the use of a retrofitted collective action mechanism. The debt restructuring has helped to set Barbados’ public debt on a clear downward trajectory. A sustained reform effort, maintaining high primary surpluses and ambitious structural reforms, will be needed to gradually reduce public debt from about 160 percent of GDP before the restructuring to the country’s 60 percent debt-to-GDP target.


Author(s):  
Nauro F. Campos ◽  
Paul De Grauwe ◽  
Yuemei Ji

Structural reform policies move like the business cycle. There are moments when these are implemented with great fervour and others when they are put on the back burner or even dismantled. After the global financial crisis, and in particular the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, many countries were forced by creditor countries or were self-imposed to apply deep reforms to their product markets and especially to their labour markets. Now that Europe is recovering, the pressure to implement structural reforms has abated....


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Aguiar ◽  
Manuel Amador ◽  
Gita Gopinath
Keyword(s):  

Subject Outlook for Omani debt. Significance Over the last two years, all three major credit rating agencies have cut Oman’s sovereign debt rating to junk status (meaning a rating below BBB-), most recently Moody’s on March 5. This has happened despite strengthening oil prices and positive internal developments, because of a growing debt load, resistance to fiscal reform and governance concerns. Impacts Funds forced to sell Omani bonds, due to their junk status, will buy BBB-rated sovereigns. A pause in Omani bond issuance could raise market demand for similarly rated sovereign issues in the region, such as Bahrain. Negatively rated oil-exporting sovereigns may speed up fiscal reforms to avoid Oman’s fate.


2020 ◽  
pp. 204-209
Author(s):  
MIRZA KHIDASHELI

Covid-19 pandemic have shaped new economic reality. Globalization shaped the new type of economic. Businesses are excessively depended on an international cooperation. After 11/4/2020 when WHO declared the global pandemic, developed states were trying to build own medical equipment factories, but it came up harder than it appeared first. Precisely no one knows a scale of the recession, because it depended on the healthcare issues, not on an economic itself. So, developed states already have announced unprecedented packages of fiscal and monetary stimulus. Novel coronavirus outbreak creates economic threats for Georgian economic and financial stability too. But as everything, it has minimum two sides. Crises and shocks are a favorable time for rethinking everything again. The crisis can more precisely show the vulnerable areas and obtain a political support for changes and reforms. The permanent deficit of current accounts and trade balance is not new normal for Georgian economic, but the pandemic showed how it can increase rapidly by the tourism sector and the money transfers declining. Beside current account balance permanent deficit, a structure of the balance is another challenge. It is obvious that, economic development and improvement of trade balance are basic issues for sustainable economic, but without FDI it is a «mission impossible». The problem has complicated, because of last five-year FDI amounts are shrinking year to year. Another direction of pandemic interference is state budget. The budget revenues structural analyses showed increasing share of sovereign debt. Much more, GDP to sovereign debt ratio reached 40% in 2019. The currency devaluation and economic slowdown worsening this condition. So, we have less opportunities for debt in long run future. Another challenge of Georgian public finance is a structure of the budget expenses. A share of social costs and subsidies are consisting more than 1/3 of the state budget and only 15% consists capital spending, which can really boost economy and promote employment in short run. Amid pandemic, banks credit portfolios also are under the risk, especially loans linked to tourism and development sectors. The pandemic shock needs two side response policy: fiscal stimulus in short run and structural reforms in long run. Creating monetary stimulus packages, Georgia is more restricted than developed economics and emerging markets. So, we need coherent structural reforms to accomplish comprehensive “small government” model. Social spending should be replaced by supporting economic growth and subsequent employment.


Subject The risk of a financial crisis in China. Significance A number of scenarios currently playing out in China's financial system have the potential to trigger a financial crisis. Most pressing among these, as with any crisis, is the leverage and its potential to aggravate other factors, especially off-balance-sheet financing. A subtle state-led restructuring of debt is already under way, indicating that officials have grasped some of the lessons of a previous bailout. While this lessens the immediate possibility of a financial crisis, its scale is inadequate to deal with the consequences of the debt overhang. Impacts Currency liberalisation and structural reforms will be postponed in favour of stability. Bad loans are unlikely to reach 1990s levels, but the debt overhang will retard economic growth. Poor corporate governance practices and a failure to reform stock markets will hinder debt restructuring. The fiscal cost of a bailout, were one necessary, would be prolonged over several years, as in the 1998 case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document