scholarly journals Heterogeneity of Binding Sites for Glucocorticoid and the Glucocorticoid-Receptor Complex in Rat Livers

1984 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto MURAMATSU ◽  
Makoto TANAKA ◽  
Atsuko FUJITA ◽  
Susumu OTOMO ◽  
Hironaka AIHARA
2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esma Isenovic ◽  
Marija Radojcic ◽  
Zorica Zakula ◽  
Goran Koricanac ◽  
Nevena Ribarac-Stepic

In order to improve current clinical treatment of human hypocortisolism, it is necessary to understand molecular aspects of this pathophysiology. In this study liver tissues from male Wistar rats were used as an experimental model to study structural and functional properties of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in the absence of glucocorticoid hormones (GC). Results show that acute adrenalectomy (ADX) significantly increases the number of GR binding sites and GR protein content. In addition, acute ADX stimulates increase in stability of the GR, decrease in stability of the glucocorticoid- receptor complex (G-R), and changes in accumulation of the G-R complex in nuclei and its cellular distribution. .


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (17) ◽  
pp. 1839-1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Tarmizi Che Has ◽  
Mary Chebib

GABAA receptors are members of the Cys-loop family of ligand-gated ion channels which mediate most inhibitory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. These receptors are pentameric assemblies of individual subunits, including α1-6, β1-3, γ1-3, δ, ε, π, θ and ρ1-3. The majority of receptors are comprised of α, β and γ or δ subunits. Depending on the subunit composition, the receptors are located in either the synapses or extrasynaptic regions. The most abundant receptors are α1βγ2 receptors, which are activated and modulated by a variety of pharmacologically and clinically unrelated agents such as benzodiazepines, barbiturates, anaesthetics and neurosteroids, all of which bind at distinct binding sites located within the receptor complex. However, compared to αβγ, the binary αβ receptors lack a benzodiazepine α-γ2 interface. In pentameric αβ receptors, the third subunit is replaced with either an α1 or a β3 subunit leading to two distinct receptors that differ in subunit stoichiometry, 2α:3β or 3α:2β. The consequence of this is that 3α:2β receptors contain an α-α interface whereas 2α:3β receptors contain a β-β interface. Apart from the replacement of γ by α1 or β3 in binary receptors, the incorporation of ε subunit into GABAA receptors might be more complicated. As the ε subunit is not only capable of substituting the γ subunit, but also replacing the α/β subunits, receptors with altered stoichiometry and different pharmacological properties are produced. The different subunit arrangement of the receptors potentially constructs novel binding sites which may become new targets of the current or new drugs.


1980 ◽  
Vol 255 (9) ◽  
pp. 3866-3870
Author(s):  
D.M. DiSorbo ◽  
D.S. Phelps ◽  
V.S. Ohl ◽  
G. Litwack

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A Sacta ◽  
Bowranigan Tharmalingam ◽  
Maddalena Coppo ◽  
David A Rollins ◽  
Dinesh K Deochand ◽  
...  

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) potently represses macrophage-elicited inflammation, however, the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. Our genome-wide analysis in mouse macrophages reveals that pro-inflammatory paused genes, activated via global negative elongation factor (NELF) dissociation and RNA Polymerase (Pol)2 release from early elongation arrest, and non-paused genes, induced by de novo Pol2 recruitment, are equally susceptible to acute glucocorticoid repression. Moreover, in both cases the dominant mechanism involves rapid GR tethering to p65 at NF-kB-binding sites. Yet, specifically at paused genes, GR activation triggers widespread promoter accumulation of NELF, with myeloid cell-specific NELF deletion conferring glucocorticoid resistance. Conversely, at non-paused genes, GR attenuates the recruitment of p300 and histone acetylation, leading to a failure to assemble BRD4 and Mediator at promoters and enhancers, ultimately blocking Pol2 initiation. Thus, GR displays no preference for a specific pro-inflammatory gene class; however, it effects repression by targeting distinct temporal events and components of transcriptional machinery.


Cell ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn B. Senior ◽  
Fred R. Frankel

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 4683-4693 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Austin ◽  
M D Biggin

We examined the mechanism by which the C-terminal 236 amino acids of the even-skipped protein (region CD) repress transcription. A fusion protein, CDGB, was created that contains region CD fused to the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain. This protein repressed transcription in an in vitro system containing purified fractions of the RNA polymerase II general transcription factors, and repression was dependent upon the presence of high-affinity glucocorticoid receptor binding sites in the promoter. Repression by CDGB was prevented when the promoter DNA was preincubated with TFIID or TBP, whereas preincubation of the template DNA with CDGB prevented TFIID binding. Together, these results strongly imply that CDGB represses transcription by inhibiting TFIID binding, and further experiments suggested a mechanism by which this may occur. Region CD can mediate cooperative interactions between repressor molecules such that molecules bound at the glucocorticoid receptor binding sites stabilize binding of additional CDGB molecules to low-affinity binding sites throughout the basal promoter. Binding to some of these low-affinity sites was shown to contribute to repression. Further experiments suggested that the full-length eve protein also represses transcription by the same mechanism. We speculate that occupancy of secondary sites within the basal promoter by CDGB or the eve protein inhibits subsequent TFIID binding to repress transcription, a mechanism we term cooperative blocking.


1997 ◽  
Vol 152 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Montiel ◽  
M C Caro ◽  
E Jiménez

Angiotensin II (Ang II) provokes rapid internalisation of its receptor from plasma membranes in isolated rat hepatocytes. After 10 min stimulation with Ang II, plasma membrane lost about 60% of its 125I-Ang II-binding capacity. Internalisation was blocked by phenylarsine oxide (PhAsO), whereas okadaic acid, which markedly reduced the sustained phase of calcium mobilization, did not have a preventive effect on Ang II–receptor complex sequestration. These data suggest that Ang II receptor internalisation is probably independent of a phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycle of critical serine/threonine residues in the receptor molecule. To establish a relationship between sequestration of the Ang II receptor and the physical properties of the Ang II-binding sites, 125I-Ang II–receptor complex profiles were analysed by isoelectric focusing. In plasma membrane preparations two predominant Ang II-binding sites, migrating to pI 6·8 and 6·5 were found. After exposure to Ang II, cells lost 125I-Ang II-binding capacity to the Ang II–receptor complex migrating at pI 6·8 which was prevented in PhAsO-treated cells. Pretreatment of hepatocytes with okadaic acid did not modify Ang II–receptor complex profiles, indicating that the binding sites corresponding to pI 6·5 and pI 6·8 do not represent a phosphorylated and/or non-phosphorylated form of the Ang II receptor. The results show that the Ang II–receptor complex isoform at pI 6·8 represents a functional form of the type-1 Ang II receptor. Further studies are necessary to identify the Ang II-related nature of the binding sites corresponding to pI 6·5. Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 152, 407–412


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document