scholarly journals Rationale for the Use of Combination Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Therapy in Heart Failure

2004 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Yasumura ◽  
Kunio Miyatake ◽  
Hiroshi Okamoto ◽  
Takeshi Miyauchi ◽  
Masatoshi Kawana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor Blocker ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor ◽  
Blocker Therapy ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitor

scholarly journals Clinical Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Greene ◽  
Sujung Choi ◽  
Steven J. Lippmann ◽  
Robert J. Mentz ◽  
Melissa A. Greiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Receptor Blocker ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor Blocker ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitor

Background Sacubitril/Valsartan has been highly efficacious in randomized trials of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan in older patients hospitalized for HFrEF in real‐world US practice is unclear. Methods and Results This study included Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years who were hospitalized for HFrEF ≤40% in the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure registry between October 2015 and December 2018, and eligible for sacubitril/valsartan. Associations between discharge prescription of sacubitril/valsartan and clinical outcomes were assessed after inverse probability of treatment weighting and adjustment for other HFrEF medications. Overall, 1551 (10.9%) patients were discharged on sacubitril/valsartan. Of those not prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, 7857 (62.0%) were prescribed an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker. Over 12‐month follow‐up, compared with a discharge prescription of angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with lower all‐cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72–0.94; P =0.004) but not all‐cause hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07; P =0.55) or heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91–1.18; P =0.59). Patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan versus those without a prescription had lower risk of all‐cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60–0.79; P <0.001), all‐cause hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82–0.98; P =0.02), but not heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82–1.08; P =0.40). Conclusions Among patients hospitalized for HFrEF, prescription of sacubitril/valsartan at discharge was independently associated with reduced postdischarge mortality compared with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, and reduced mortality and all‐cause hospitalization compared with no sacubitril/valsartan. These findings support the use of sacubitril/valsartan to improve postdischarge outcomes among older patients hospitalized for HFrEF in routine US clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document