scholarly journals Statistical distribution of normal hearing thresholds for high-frequency tones

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 378-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Kurakata ◽  
Tazu Mizunami
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Statistical Distribution ◽  
Hearing Thresholds

scholarly journals Evaluation of Recreational Noise Exposure and High Frequency Hearing Thresholds of University Students with Normal Hearing Between 125-8,000 Hz

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
Banu MÜJDECİ ◽  
Şule KAYA ◽  
Meltem TULĞAR ◽  
Kürşad KARAKOÇ ◽  
Mustafa KARABULUT ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Noise Exposure ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Thresholds

scholarly journals The Relevance of the High Frequency Audiometry in Tinnitus Patients with Normal Hearing in Conventional Pure-Tone Audiometry

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Vielsmeier ◽  
Astrid Lehner ◽  
Jürgen Strutz ◽  
Thomas Steffens ◽  
Peter M. Kreuzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
High Frequency Hearing Loss ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Tinnitus Severity ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry

Objective. The majority of tinnitus patients suffer from hearing loss. But a subgroup of tinnitus patients show normal hearing thresholds in the conventional pure-tone audiometry (125 Hz–8 kHz). Here we explored whether the results of the high frequency audiometry (>8 kHz) provide relevant additional information in tinnitus patients with normal conventional audiometry by comparing those with normal and pathological high frequency audiometry with respect to their demographic and clinical characteristics.Subjects and Methods. From the database of the Tinnitus Clinic at Regensburg we identified 75 patients with normal hearing thresholds in the conventional pure-tone audiometry. We contrasted these patients with normal and pathological high-frequency audiogram and compared them with respect to gender, age, tinnitus severity, pitch, laterality and duration, comorbid symptoms and triggers for tinnitus onset.Results. Patients with pathological high frequency audiometry were significantly older and had higher scores on the tinnitus questionnaires in comparison to patients with normal high frequency audiometry. Furthermore, there was an association of high frequency audiometry with the laterality of tinnitus.Conclusion. In tinnitus patients with normal pure-tone audiometry the high frequency audiometry provides useful additional information. The association between tinnitus laterality and asymmetry of the high frequency audiometry suggests a potential causal role for the high frequency hearing loss in tinnitus etiopathogenesis.

scholarly journals Statistical distribution of normal hearing thresholds under free-field listening conditions

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 440-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Kurakata ◽  
Tazu Mizunami ◽  
Kazuma Matsushita ◽  
Kaoru Ashihara
Keyword(s):  
Free Field ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Statistical Distribution ◽  
Hearing Thresholds

Continuous Versus Pulsed Tones in Audiometry

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew H. Burk ◽  
Terry L. Wiley
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
False Positives ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Auditory Thresholds ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Threshold Assessment ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The purpose of this study was to compare auditory thresholds obtained for continuous and pulsed tones in listeners with normal hearing. Auditory thresholds, test—retest reliability, falsepositive responses, and listener preference were compared for both signals. Hearing thresholds and test—retest reliability were comparable for the 2 signals, and there were no significant differences in the number of false positives or the number of presentations required to reach threshold. Listener preference, however, indicated that pulsed tones were preferred over continuous tones by 67% of the listeners when listening to low-level or high-frequency tones. These findings, coupled with previous reports demonstrating the benefits of using automatically pulsed tones in threshold assessment for listeners with tinnitus, support the general use of pulsed tones in clinical audiometry.

Auditory Gating and Extended High-Frequency Thresholds in Normal-Hearing Adults With Minimal Tinnitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1S) ◽  
pp. 209-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Campbell ◽  
Alison LaBrec ◽  
Connor Bean ◽  
Mashhood Nielsen ◽  
Won So
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Auditory Gating

scholarly journals Comparison of the high-frequency morpho-syntactic structures of cochlear implant children and children with normal hearing aged 4-6 years

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91
Author(s):  
Seyedeh Sepideh seyedhosseini ◽  
Fatemeh Aqayi ◽  
Shima Rahmani ◽  
Toktam Maleki Shahmahmood ◽  
Fatemeh Haresabadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Syntactic Structures

Identifying Subclinical Hearing Loss: Extended Audiometry and Word Recognition in Noise

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Ward R. Drennan
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Recognition Task ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Normal Range ◽  
Closed Set ◽  
Age Related ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry ◽  
Hearing Problems

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Normal-hearing people often have complaints about the ability to recognize speech in noise. Such disabilities are not typically assessed with conventional audiometry. Suprathreshold temporal deficits might contribute to reduced word recognition in noise as well as reduced temporally based binaural release of masking for speech. Extended high-frequency audibility (&#x3e;8 kHz) has also been shown to contribute to speech perception in noise. The primary aim of this study was to compare conventional audiometric measures with measures that could reveal subclinical deficits. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry was done with 119 normal-hearing people ranging in age from 18 to 72. The ability to recognize words in noise was evaluated with and without differences in temporally based spatial cues. A low-uncertainty, closed-set word recognition task was used to limit cognitive influences. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In normal-hearing listeners, word recognition in noise ability decreases significantly with increasing pure-tone average (PTA). On average, signal-to-noise ratios worsened by 5.7 and 6.0 dB over the normal range, for the diotic and dichotic conditions, respectively. When controlling for age, a significant relationship remained in the diotic condition. Measurement error was estimated at 1.4 and 1.6 dB for the diotic and dichotic conditions, respectively. Controlling for both PTA and age, EHF-PTAs showed significant partial correlations with SNR50 in both conditions (<i>ρ</i> = 0.30 and 0.23). Temporally based binaural release of masking worsened with age by 1.94 dB from 18 to 72 years old but showed no significant relationship with either PTA. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> All three assessments in this study demonstrated hearing problems independently of those observed in conventional audiometry. Considerable degradations in word recognition in noise abilities were observed as PTAs increased within the normal range. The use of an efficient words-in-noise measure might help identify functional hearing problems for individuals that are traditionally normal hearing. Extended audiometry provided additional predictive power for word recognition in noise independent of both the PTA and age. Temporally based binaural release of masking for word recognition decreased with age independent of PTAs within the normal range, indicating multiple mechanisms of age-related decline with potential clinical impact.

scholarly journals Hearing Thresholds Changes after MRI 1.5T of Head and Neck

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Bahaloo ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Davari ◽  
Mohammad Sobhan ◽  
Seyyed Jalil Mirmohammadi ◽  
Mohammad Taghi Jalalian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Significant Shift ◽  
Auditory Thresholds ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
High Frequency Audiometry ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After

Introduction. Exposure to high intensity noise produced by MRI is a cause for concern. This study was conducted to determine the temporary and permanent effects of exposure to noise created by performing MRI on the hearing threshold of the subjects using conventional and extended high frequency audiometry. Methods. This semiexperimental study was performed on 35 patients referred to Shahid Rahnemoun Hospital for head and neck MRI due to different clinical conditions. The hearing threshold of patients was measured before, immediately after, and 24 hours after performing 1.5 Tesla MRI using conventional and extended high frequency audiometry. SPSS version 18 was used to compare the mean hearing thresholds before and after MRI using paired T test and repeated measures analysis. Results. Comparison of auditory thresholds in conventional and extended high frequencies before and immediately after MRI showed a significant shift at 4 KHz (P = 0.008 and P = 0.08 for right and left ears), 6 KHz (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01 for right and left ears), and 14 KHz (P =0.03 and P = 0.31 for right and left ears). However, there was no significant difference between audiometric thresholds before and 24 hours after MRI. Conclusion. Noise due to 1.5 Tesla MRI can only cause transient threshold shift.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document