Adequacy of 1-cm Distal Margin After Restorative Rectal Cancer Resection With Sharp Mesorectal Excision and Preoperative Combined-Modality Therapy

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey G. Moore ◽  
Elyn Riedel ◽  
Bruce D. Minsky ◽  
Leonard Saltz ◽  
Philip Paty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Combined Modality Therapy ◽  
Distal Margin ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Rectal Cancer Resection ◽  
Combined Modality

Results After Rectal Cancer Resection With In-Continuity Partial Vaginectomy and Total Mesorectal Excision

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 664-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ruo ◽  
P. B. Paty ◽  
B. D. Minsky ◽  
W. D. Wong ◽  
A. M. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Total Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Rectal Cancer Resection

Preservation of Pathologic Outcomes in Robotic versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: Can the Robot Fill the Minimally Invasive Gap?

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 1876-1881
Author(s):  
Adam Truong ◽  
Nicole Lopez ◽  
Phillip Fleshner ◽  
Karen Zaghiyan
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Open Resection ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Rectal Cancer Resection ◽  
Robotic Resection

Open resection remains the standard of care in the surgical management of rectal cancer with recent studies unable to prove noninferiority of laparoscopic resection. Few studies directly compare robotic versus open techniques. This is a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients undergoing robotic or open rectal cancer resection during a three-year period. The primary endpoint was a composite of complete mesorectal excision, circumferential resection margin <1 mm, and distal resection margin <1 mm. The study cohort included 64 patients undergoing robotic (n = 28) or open (n = 36) resection. Successful surgical resection was similar between the robotic (75%) and open (76%) approaches. Robotic resection was associated with significantly lower blood loss ( P = 0.02) and significantly longer operative times ( P = 0.009) compared with open resection. Length of hospital stay and complications were similar between groups. Both male gender ( P = 0.03) and shorter tumor distance from the anal verge ( P = 0.01) were predictors for unsuccessful surgical resection in open, but not robotic, surgery. Pathologic outcomes are similar between robotic and open rectal cancer resection, even early in the learning curve. Tumor distance from the anal verge complicates open total mesorectal excision; however, robotic surgery is less impacted. Robotic resection may be a promising minimally invasive approach for rectal cancer resection.

scholarly journals A Case of Intraoperative Latex Anaphylaxis during General Anesthesia for Rectal Cancer Resection

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
Toshihisa TAMURA ◽  
Aiichiro HIGURE ◽  
Naoki NAGATA ◽  
Keiji HIRATA ◽  
Yoshifumi NAKAYAMA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Rectal Cancer Resection

scholarly journals Anastomotic salvage after rectal cancer resection using the Turnbull–Cutait delayed anastomosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 405-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Hallet ◽  
Alexandre Bouchard ◽  
Sébastien Drolet ◽  
Hélène Milot ◽  
Emilie Desrosiers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Rectal Cancer Resection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document