Machining of simulated defects in pipeline steels: A neutron diffraction study of local stress effects

1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Clapham ◽  
T W Krause ◽  
R Sabet-Sharghi ◽  
D Micke ◽  
D L Atherton ◽  
...  

The most commonly used in-line pipeline inspection tools utilize the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technique, which is sensitive to the stress state of the pipe wall. Calibration of these MFL tools is often carried out using unstressed pipeline sections containing simulated defects, usually produced by mechanical drilling. There is also strong interest in creating simulated defects in stressed pipe walls, thus simulating corrosion in the field. In this study, neutron diffraction is used to map the local stresses surrounding mechanically and electrochemically drilled holes in a steel plate sample. Holes were drilled in unstressed samples, as well as samples held at a constant 80 MPa uniaxial stress. Mechanical drilling into a stressed sample was found to induce considerable residual stresses around the hole. Conversely, electrochemical drilling did not create a residual stress field in the vicinity of the hole.

Author(s):  
L. Clapham ◽  
A. Plotnikov ◽  
D. L. Atherton

Of these various factors that influence the Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) signal, stress is the most complex and the least understood. Pipe wall operating stresses may exceed 70% of the yield strength, but much higher local stress levels are present around defects because of stress concentrations. Understanding how these stresses affect MFL signals is crucial to accurate defect depth predictions. We have conducted a number of studies that investigate the effects of bulk and local stresses on magnetic behaviour and MFL signals. Both single defects and interacting (2-hole) defects have been investigated. In addition to MFL studies, we have used a Magnetic Barkhausen Noise (MBN) measurement technique to characterize magnetic behaviour of the sample in response both to local and bulk stresses. In general we find that, for typical inspection geometry (axial magnetizing field and hoop stress) the MFL signal decreases as stress increases. At high flux densities stress effects diminish, but are still significant. Although the general trends described above are common to all defects, different types of defects (through wall hole, blind hole, interacting defects) all display uniquely different MFL stress responses. We attribute this to the difference in local stress distributions (stress concentrations) around these defects.


1964 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.W. Peterson ◽  
V.N. Sadana ◽  
W.L. Korst

1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-855-C1-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. SCHARENBERG ◽  
G. WILL

1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-675-C1-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. O. BARGOUTH ◽  
G. WILL

1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-670-C1-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. MOREAU ◽  
C. MICHEL ◽  
M. SIMMONS ◽  
T. J. O'KEEFE ◽  
W. J. JAMES

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document