Binaural Interaction in the Cod

1980 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-332
Author(s):  
KATHLEEN HORNER ◽  
OLAV SAND ◽  
PER S. ENGER
Keyword(s):  
Phase Locking ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Single Units ◽  
Torus Semicircularis ◽  
Sound Stimulation ◽  
Binaural Interaction

1. Recordings were made from 93 single units in the acoustical lobes and the torus semicircularis of the cod during sound stimulation and anodal blocking of the posterior saccular nerves. 2. Most medullary sound responses were phase locked to the stimulus to some degree. The phase locking was less pronounced in the torus semicircularis, and sound stimulation sometimes caused clear inhibition of activity in this area. A large fraction of the units in both recording loci was insensitive to our sound stimuli, which acted mainly via the swimbladder. 3. Peripheral blocking caused decreased activity and inhibition of sound responses in the acoustic lobes, indicating excitatory ascending input to this region. Binaural interaction was found in 8 of 29 medullary units tested during both ipsi- and contralateral block. 4. Single-sided blocking experiments revealed both inhibitory and excitatory input to the torus semicircularis region. Binaural interaction was found in 3 of the 5 units tested during both ipsi- and contralateral block in this area.

Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. IV. Comparison of monaural and binaural response properties

1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1306-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kuwada ◽  
T. C. Yin ◽  
J. Syka ◽  
T. J. Buunen ◽  
R. E. Wickesberg
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Phase Locking ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Significant Shift ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Binaural Interaction ◽  
Interaural Phase ◽  
Discharge Patterns ◽  
Response Area

We studied the monaural and binaural response properties of 82 low-frequency inferior colliculus (IC) neurons that display a clear sensitivity to changes in interaural phase. Most cells (60%) are excited by sound delivered to either ear, the remainder being excited only by stimulation of one ear; 70% of the neurons receive their stronger or sole excitatory input from the contralateral ear. A monotonic relation between spike discharge and sound pressure level (SPL) is seen in 65% of the monaural response areas, i.e., the range of stimulus frequencies and intensities effective in eliciting a response, while 30% show a nonmonotonic response pattern. In 33% of the cases there is a significant shift in the most effective frequency as a function of SPL. Most discharge patterns are classified as sustained (69%) and the remainder as onset. However, there is considerable variability within these patterns and often two types of discharges are present at different points in the same response area of a single cell. The sustained responses show a broad range of latencies, while onset patterns show a tighter distribution and shorter first spike latencies. Thus, IC neurons showing sensitivity to changes in interaural phase can differ in laterality preferences, response area characteristics, discharge patterns, and latency parameters. Given the diversity of inputs to the IC from lower brain stem structures, this heterogeneity is not surprising. For most neurons excited by stimulation to either ear, the characteristic frequencies, discharge patterns, and first spike latencies are similar, suggesting that the monaural inputs to a binaural cell are of the same type. A neuron's most effective frequencies at a particular SPL for monaural and binaural stimulation are, in general, the same. In some cases a neuron's monaural and binaural response areas can show remarkable similarities, suggesting that certain monaural features are intimately related to the binaural response. In 18% of the IC cells, phase locking to the monaural stimulating frequency is seen. When both inputs are phase locked, a simple coincidence model can predict the interaural phase or delay at which the maximal binaural discharge occurs.

Phase-Locked Responses to Pure Tones in the Inferior Colliculus

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 1926-1935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang-Fa Liu ◽  
Alan R. Palmer ◽  
Mark N. Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Phase Locking ◽  
Single Units ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Dorsal Cortex ◽  
Upper Limits ◽  
Ascending Pathways ◽  
Pure Tones ◽  
The Brain

In the auditory system, some ascending pathways preserve the precise timing information present in a temporal code of frequency. This can be measured by studying responses that are phase-locked to the stimulus waveform. At each stage along a pathway, there is a reduction in the upper frequency limit of the phase-locking and an increase in the steady-state latency. In the guinea pig, phase-locked responses to pure tones have been described at various levels from auditory nerve to neocortex but not in the inferior colliculus (IC). Therefore we made recordings from 161 single units in guinea pig IC. Of these single units, 68% (110/161) showed phase-locked responses. Cells that phase-locked were mainly located in the central nucleus but also occurred in the dorsal cortex and external nucleus. The upper limiting frequency of phase-locking varied greatly between units (80−1,034 Hz) and between anatomical divisions. The upper limits in the three divisions were central nucleus, >1,000 Hz; dorsal cortex, 700 Hz; external nucleus, 320 Hz. The mean latencies also varied and were central nucleus, 8.2 ± 2.8 (SD) ms; dorsal cortex, 17.2 ms; external nucleus, 13.3 ms. We conclude that many cells in the central nucleus receive direct inputs from the brain stem, whereas cells in the external and dorsal divisions receive input from other structures that may include the forebrain.

Neurons sensitive to interaural phase disparity in gerbil superior olive: diverse monaural and temporal response properties

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1668-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Spitzer ◽  
M. N. Semple
Keyword(s):  
Phase Locking ◽  
Dorsal Region ◽  
Cell Column ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Superior Olive ◽  
Binaural Interaction ◽  
Medial Dorsal ◽  
Interaural Phase ◽  
Monaural Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. We assessed mechanisms of binaural interaction underlying detection of interaural phase disparity (IPD) by recording single-unit responses in the superior olivary complex (SOC) of the anesthetized gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Binaural responses were obtained from 58 IPD-sensitive single units, 44 of which were histologically localized. Monaural responses were also obtained for 52 of 58 IPD-sensitive units. Additionally, responses were recorded from 16 units (best frequency < 2.4 kHz) in lateral SOC that were excited by ipsilateral stimulation and inhibited by contralateral stimulation (EI), none of which was IPD sensitive. Our results are consistent with a mechanism of binaural interaction involving detection of coincident excitatory inputs from the two ears. There was no compelling evidence of binaural sensitivity arising from IPD-dependent interactions of phase-locked excitatory and inhibitory inputs from the two ears. Despite the uniformity of binaural interactions, considerable diversity of temporal and monaural response properties was observed. 2. Monaural and binaural responses of 35 of 58 IPD-sensitive units were phase locked to the period of low-frequency (< 2.5 kHz) tones. Most phase-locking units were bilaterally excitable and, consistent with the coincidence-detection model, their IPD selectivity could be predicted from the difference between the mean phases of the monaural responses. The remaining units (23 of 58) did not phase lock in response to monaural or binaural tones. Most non-phase-locking units failed to respond to monaural stimulation of one or both ears (monaurally unresponsive units). 3. Some IPD-sensitive units were inhibited by monaural stimulation of the ipsilateral ear or both ears. A few units responded only at the onset of monaural and binaural tones. Phase locking was present in responses of some, but not all, of these monaurally inhibited and onset units. 4. Most IPD-sensitive neurons were encountered at sites within or immediately adjacent to the cell column of the medial superior olive (MSO). IPD-sensitive units were also recorded in the lateral superior olive (LSO), in the superior paraolivary nucleus (SPN), and within a region forming a medial-dorsal cap around MSO. Bilaterally excitable unites were concentrated around MSO, but were also encountered in SPN, the medial-dorsal region, and LSO. Some monaurally unresponsive units were recorded in the vicinity of the MSO, but most were located in the medial-dorsal region. Monaurally inhibited units were localized to the medial border of the MSO cell column or to SPN. Onset units were localized to SPN and the medial-dorsal region. EI units were located exclusively in LSO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Response properties of single units in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and paralemniscal zone of an echolocating bat

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 842-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Covey
Keyword(s):  
Sound Level ◽  
Single Units ◽  
Superior Olivary Complex ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Lateral Lemniscus ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Binaural Interaction ◽  
Dorsal Nucleus ◽  
Interaural Level Differences

1. Connectional evidence suggests that the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL) and the paralemniscal zone (PL) function as centers for binaural analysis interposed between the superior olivary complex and the midbrain. In addition, the DNLL is known to be a major source of inhibitory input to the midbrain. The aim of this study was to characterize the response properties of neurons in DNLL and PL of the echolocating bat Eptesicus fuscus, a species that utilizes high-frequency hearing and that might be expected to have a large proportion of neurons responsive to interaural differences in sound level. 2. Auditory stimuli were presented monaurally or binaurally to awake animals, and responses of single units were recorded extra-cellularly with the use of glass micropipettes. 3. Below the ventrolateral border of the inferior colliculus is a region that contains large gamma-aminobutyric acid-positive neurons. On the basis of its immunohistochemical reactivity, this entire region could be considered as DNLL. However, within the area, there was an uneven distribution of binaural responses. Caudally, binaural neurons made up 84% (41/49) of those tested, but rostrally only 29% (6/21). For this reason the rostral area is considered as a separate functional subdivision and referred to as the dorsal paralemniscal zone (DPL). PL is located ventral to DPL and medial to the intermediate and ventral nuclei of the lateral lemniscus; in PL 88% (14/16) of neurons were binaural. 4. Most neurons responded only to a contralateral stimulus when sounds were presented monaurally. Out of 49 neurons in DNLL, 42 responded only to a contralateral sound, 1 responded only to an ipsilateral sound, and 6 responded to sound at either ear. In the DPL, all of the 21 neurons tested responded to a contralateral sound and none to an ipsilateral sound. Out of 16 neurons in the PL, 11 responded only to a contralateral sound, 1 responded only to an ipsilateral sound, and 4 responded to sound at either ear. 5. When sounds were presented at both ears simultaneously, several different patterns of binaural interaction occurred. The most common pattern was suppression of the response to sound at one ear by sound at the other ear. In DNLL, 57% (28/49) of neurons showed this type of binaural interaction. Another 10% (5/49) showed facilitation at some interaural level differences and suppression at others, and another 10% (5/49) showed facilitation at some interaural level differences but no suppression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Some features of binaural input to single neurons in physiologically defined area AI of cat cerebral cortex

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Phillips ◽  
D. R. Irvine
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
The Other ◽  
Single Units ◽  
Single Neurons ◽  
Contralateral Ear ◽  
Tonal Stimuli ◽  
Stimulus Specificity ◽  
Cat Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. In the ectosylvian cortex of 24 barbiturate-anesthetized cats, area AI was identified by its frequency organization and the responses to tonal stimuli of single neurons in that field were examined using sealed stimulating systems incorporating calibrated probe microphone assemblies. 2. The responsiveness to monaural and binaural best-frequency stimuli was examined quantitatively for 282 single units in AI. One hundred thirty-nine cells (49%) were excited by independent stimulation of only one ear and were classified as EO cells. In general, the effective monaural excitatory input was derived from the contralateral ear. One hundred ten (39%) neurons were excited by independent stimulation of each ear and were classified as EE units. For these neurons, the contralateral responses were generally stronger, shorter in latency, and lower in threshold than were their ipsilateral responses. Thirty-three cells (12%) gave weak or no responses to monaural stimuli but responded securely to binaural stimuli. These cells were classified as predominantly binaural (PB). 3. Binaural interactions were examined by comparison of the response to binaural, equally intense stimuli to the stronger monaural response. Among EO cells suppression was the most common form of interaction, while for EE cells summation was the more common. Less than 8% of cells were found to be monaural. 4. In electrode penetrations radial to the cortex surface, cells received their stronger or sole monaural excitatory input from a common ear, generally the contralateral. Within such penetrations, however, cells commonly differed with regard to the nature of their input from the other ear and/or in their binaural interactions. 5. Comparison of these data with data previously reported for subcortical auditory nuclei revealed that AI preserves many of the stimulus specificity characteristics of the lower nuclei. The reasons for the preservation of these characteristics at the cortex and the implications of the present data for the binaural column hypothesis are discussed.

Responses of neurons in inferior colliculus to variations in sound-source azimuth

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Aitkin ◽  
G. R. Gates ◽  
S. C. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Horizontal Plane ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Noise Burst ◽  
Single Units ◽  
Central Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Part ◽  
Binaural Interaction ◽  
Azimuthal Position ◽  
Discharge Rates

This study aimed to classify the responses of single units in the auditory midbrain to acoustic stimuli presented in the free field in order to characterize those units likely to have a role in sound localization in the horizontal plane. The responses of 131 single units in the inferior colliculus of the cat and the brush-tailed possum were studied using tone and noise-burst stimuli presented from a speaker capable of movement at any point along a plane 10 degrees above the horizontal plane. Speaker positions along this plane are referred to as speaker azimuths; those on the same side as the recorded inferior colliculus as ipsilateral, and on the opposite side as contralateral, azimuths. For each unit, spike counts were measured as a function of azimuth either at the best frequency (BF) or using noise bursts. These functions are referred to as azimuth functions and were usually measured for at least two intensities, between 10 and 70 dB above threshold. The recording sites of most units were identified histologically with the aid of microlesions and were related to the major subdivisions of the inferior colliculus: the central nucleus (ICC), the lateral part of the external nucleus (ICX), and the rostroventral process (R-ICX). Two units were located in the pericentral nucleus and two in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus. Two major classes of neuron were identified: omnidirectional and directionally sensitive. Omnidirectional units exhibited azimuth functions that were either flat or that declined gradually at progressively ipsilateral azimuths. For the latter units, discharge rates at all points monotonically increased with stimulus intensity. There was no indication, for either type of omnidirectional unit, of significant binaural interaction. A good correlation was found between the summed proportions of excitatory-excitatory (EE) and monaural (EO) units observed in dichotic studies (46-55%) and the proportion of omnidirectional units in the present study (47%). A subgroup of directionally sensitive units (36% of the total) displayed azimuth functions for which the azimuthal position of the discharge border or peak firing azimuth remained essentially unaltered over a range of stimulus intensities. These azimuth-selective units are likely to have a role in the detection of the location of stimuli in the horizontal plane and appear to include units that would be considered excitatory-inhibitory (EI) or delay sensitive in dichotic studies. The azimuths over which directionally sensitive units showed their marked directional effects were influenced by the position of the contralateral pinna.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Real-Time Excitation of Slow Oscillations during Deep Sleep Using Acoustic Stimulation

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 5169
Author(s):  
Marek Piorecky ◽  
Vlastimil Koudelka ◽  
Vaclava Piorecka ◽  
Jan Strobl ◽  
Daniela Dudysova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Slow Wave ◽  
Phase Synchronization ◽  
Phase Locking ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Deep Sleep ◽  
Sound Stimulation ◽  
Eeg Data ◽  
Stimulation Method ◽  
And Function

Slow-wave synchronous acoustic stimulation is a promising research and therapeutic tool. It is essential to clearly understand the principles of the synchronization methods, to know their performances and limitations, and, most importantly, to have a clear picture of the effect of stimulation on slow-wave activity (SWA). This paper covers the mentioned and currently missing parts of knowledge that are essential for the appropriate development of the method itself and future applications. Artificially streamed real sleep EEG data were used to quantitatively compare the two currently used real-time methods: the phase-locking loop (PLL) and the fixed-step stimulus in our own implementation. The fixed-step stimulation method was concluded to be more reliable and practically applicable compared to the PLL method. The sleep experiment with chronic insomnia patients in our sleep laboratory was analyzed in order to precisely characterize the effect of sound stimulation during deep sleep. We found that there is a significant phase synchronization of delta waves, which were shown to be the most sensitive metric of the effect of acoustic stimulation compared to commonly used averaged signal and power analyses. This finding may change the understanding of the effect and function of the SWA stimulation described in the literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document