scholarly journals Derived loss of signal complexity and plasticity in a genus of weakly electric fish

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Saenz ◽  
Tingting Gu ◽  
Yue Ban ◽  
Kirk O. Winemiller ◽  
Michael R. Markham
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Mate Recognition ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Signal Plasticity ◽  
Signal Complexity ◽  
Potential Factors ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Weakly Electric

Signal plasticity can maximize the usefulness of costly animal signals such as the electric organ discharges (EODs) of weakly electric fishes. Some species of the order Gymnotiformes rapidly alter their EOD amplitude and duration in response to circadian cues and social stimuli. How this plasticity is maintained across related species with different degrees of signal complexity is poorly understood. In one genus of weakly electric gymnotiform fish (Brachyhypopomus) only one species, B. bennetti, produces a monophasic signal while all other species emit complex biphasic or multiphasic EOD waveforms produced by two overlapping but asynchronous action potentials in each electric organ cell (electrocyte). One consequence of this signal complexity is the suppression of low-frequency signal content that is detectable by electroreceptive predators. In complex EODs, reduction of the EOD amplitude and duration during daytime inactivity can decrease both predation risk and the metabolic cost of EOD generation. We compared EOD plasticity and its underlying physiology in Brachyhypopomus focusing on B. bennetti. We found that B. bennetti exhibits minimal EOD plasticity, but that its electrocytes retained vestigial mechanisms of biphasic signaling and vestigial mechanisms for modulating the EOD amplitude. These results suggest that this species represents a transitional phenotypic state within a clade where signal complexity and plasticity were initially gained and then lost. Signal mimicry, mate recognition, and sexual selection are potential factors maintaining the monophasic EOD phenotype in the face of detection by electroreceptive predators.

scholarly journals Derived loss of signal complexity and plasticity in a genus of weakly electric fish

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Saenz ◽  
Tingting Gu ◽  
Yue Ban ◽  
Kirk O. Winemiller ◽  
Michael R. Markham
Keyword(s):  
Species Recognition ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Metabolic Cost ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Signal Plasticity ◽  
The Face ◽  
Signal Complexity ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Weakly Electric

AbstractSignal plasticity can maximize the usefulness of costly animal signals such as the electric organ discharges (EODs) of weakly electric fishes. Some species of the order Gymnotiformes rapidly alter their EOD amplitude and duration in response to circadian cues and social stimuli. How this plasticity is maintained across related species with different degrees of signal complexity is poorly understood. In one genus of weakly electric gymnotiform fish (Brachyhypopomus) only one species, B. bennetti, produces a monophasic signal while all other species emit complex biphasic or multiphasic EOD waveforms produced by two overlapping but asynchronous action potentials in each electric organ cell (electrocyte). One consequence of this signal complexity is the suppression of low-frequency signal content that is detectable by electroreceptive predators. In complex EODs, reduction of the EOD amplitude and duration during daytime inactivity can decrease both predation risk and the metabolic cost of EOD generation. We compared EOD plasticity and its underlying physiology in Brachyhypopomus focusing on B. bennetti. We found that B. bennetti exhibits minimal EOD plasticity, but that its electrocytes retained vestigial mechanisms of biphasic signaling and vestigial mechanisms for modulating the EOD amplitude. These results suggest that this species represents a transitional phenotypic state within a clade where signal complexity and plasticity were initially gained and then lost. We discuss potential the roles of signal mimicry, species recognition, and sexual selection in maintaining the monophasic EOD phenotype in the face of detection by electroreceptive predators.

scholarly journals The weakly electric fish, Apteronotus albifrons, actively avoids experimentally induced hypoxia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Mucha ◽  
Lauren J. Chapman ◽  
Rüdiger Krahe
Keyword(s):  
Active Avoidance ◽  
Electric Fish ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
The Other ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Dissolved Oxygen Concentration ◽  
Shuttle Box ◽  
Freshwater Habitats ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Weakly Electric

AbstractAnthropogenic environmental degradation has led to an increase in the frequency and prevalence of aquatic hypoxia (low dissolved oxygen concentration, DO), which may affect habitat quality for water-breathing fishes. The weakly electric black ghost knifefish, Apteronotus albifrons, is typically found in well-oxygenated freshwater habitats in South America. Using a shuttle-box design, we exposed juvenile A. albifrons to a stepwise decline in DO from normoxia (> 95% air saturation) to extreme hypoxia (10% air saturation) in one compartment and chronic normoxia in the other. On average, A. albifrons actively avoided the hypoxic compartment below 22% air saturation. Hypoxia avoidance was correlated with upregulated swimming activity. Following avoidance, fish regularly ventured back briefly into deep hypoxia. Hypoxia did not affect the frequency of their electric organ discharges. Our results show that A. albifrons is able to sense hypoxia at non-lethal levels and uses active avoidance to mitigate its adverse effects.

Active electrolocation of objects in weakly electric fish

1999 ◽  
Vol 202 (10) ◽  
pp. 1205-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. von der Emde
Keyword(s):  
Electric Fish ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Entire Body ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Surrounding Water ◽  
Two Parameters ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Electric Signals ◽  
Weakly Electric

Weakly electric fish produce electric signals (electric organ discharges, EODs) with a specialised electric organ creating an electric field around their body. Objects within this field alter the EOD-induced current at epidermal electroreceptor organs, which are distributed over almost the entire body surface. The detection, localisation and analysis of objects performed by monitoring self-produced electric signals is called active electrolocation. Electric fish employ active electrolocation to detect objects that are less than 12 cm away and have electric properties that are different from those of the surrounding water. Within this range, the mormyrid Gnathonemus petersii can also perceive the distance of objects. Depth perception is independent of object parameters such as size, shape and material. The mechanism for distance determination through electrolocation involves calculating the ratio between two parameters of the electric image that the object projects onto the fish's skin. Electric fish can not only locate objects but can also analyse their electrical properties. Fish are informed about object impedance by measuring local amplitude changes at their receptor organs evoked by an object. In addition, all electric fish studied so far can independently determine the capacitative and resistive components of objects that possess complex impedances. This ability allows the fish to discriminate between living and non-living matter, because capacitance is a property of living organisms. African mormyrids and South American gymnotiforms use different mechanisms for capacitance detection. Mormyrids detect capacitance-evoked EOD waveform distortions, whereas gymnotiforms perform time measurements. Gymnotiforms measure the temporal phase shift of their EODs induced at body parts close to the object relative to unaffected body parts further away.

Behavioral evidence for post-pause reduced responsiveness in the electrosensory system ofGymnotus carapo

2002 ◽  
Vol 205 (16) ◽  
pp. 2525-2533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Schuster
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Sampling Rate ◽  
Sensory System ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Sensory Stimuli ◽  
Novelty Response ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Electrical Stimuli

SUMMARYGymnotiform weakly electric fish find their way in the dark using a continuously operating active sensory system. An electric organ generates a continuous train of discharges (electric organ discharges, EODs), and tuberous high-frequency electroreceptors monitor the pattern of transcutaneous current flow associated with each EOD. Here, I report that a prior interruption to the continuous train of EODs dramatically affects a response shown by many pulse-type gymnotids. In this so-called novelty response, fish normally raise their electrosensory sampling rate in response to novel sensory stimuli. The gymnotid Gymnotus carapo was induced to pause its EODs briefly, and the novelty response to sensory stimuli given post-pause was analyzed. Mechanosensory stimuli given as early as 20 EODs after a pause elicited clear novelty responses, but strong high-frequency electrical stimuli were ineffective at this time. Moreover, high-frequency electrical stimuli remained less efficient in eliciting normal-sized responses until approximately 2000 EODs, or 40s, after a pause. The post-pause inefficiency of high-frequency stimuli was not due to an inappropriate choice of intensity or their temporal patterning and did not result from the stimulation that caused the pausing. Low-frequency stimuli that also recruited ampullary electroreceptors were more efficient than high-frequency stimuli in eliciting post-pause responses. These findings show that continuous activity is required either to maintain sensitivity to high-frequency electrical stimuli or to ensure that such stimuli are able to modulate efficiently the pacemaker that sets the discharge frequency.

Evoked chirping in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus: a quantitative biophysical analysis

1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 2301-2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günther K. H. Zupanc ◽  
Leonard Maler
Keyword(s):  
Electric Organ Discharge ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Apteronotus Leptorhynchus ◽  
Biophysical Analysis ◽  
Absolute Amplitude ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Gymnotiform Fish ◽  
Weakly Electric

Apteronotus leptorhynchus, a gymnotiform fish, produces highly regular electric organ discharges of 600–1000 Hz. Short-term modulations of the electric organ discharge ("chirps") were elicited by imitating the discharges of neighboring fish. Chirps displayed an increase in frequency of approximately 100 Hz, a duration of about 15 ms, and an absolute amplitude of 0.5–2 mV. Since, similar to natural conditions, chirps summated with the beat caused by interference of the fish's own electric organ discharge and the imitating discharge, the size and shape of the chirp's amplitude envelope varied greatly according to its phase relative to the beat cycle; however, the frequency of the chirp amplitude modulation was always 50–100 Hz. All 21 males examined chirped, but their rate of chirping varied considerably (range 2–59 chirps/30 s; mean 22 chirps/30 s). In contrast, only one out of nine females chirped (mean 0.25 chirps/30 s). The latency between stimulus onset and first chirp was variable and often long (range 1.0–25.0 s; median 3.3 s). We propose that chirps are not a sensory reflex but a communicatory behavior regulated by hypothalamic peptidergic input.

scholarly journals Electrical signalling of dominance in a wild population of electric fish

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Fugère ◽  
Hernán Ortega ◽  
Rüdiger Krahe
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Electric Fish ◽  
Electric Organ Discharge ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Dominance Status ◽  
Strong Positive Relationship ◽  
Electrical Signalling ◽  
Weakly Electric

Animals often use signals to communicate their dominance status and avoid the costs of combat. We investigated whether the frequency of the electric organ discharge (EOD) of the weakly electric fish, Sternarchorhynchus sp., signals the dominance status of individuals. We correlated EOD frequency with body size and found a strong positive relationship. We then performed a competition experiment in which we found that higher frequency individuals were dominant over lower frequency ones. Finally, we conducted an electrical playback experiment and found that subjects more readily approached and attacked the stimulus electrodes when they played low-frequency signals than high-frequency ones. We propose that EOD frequency communicates dominance status in this gymnotiform species.

Changes in electric organ discharge after pausing the electromotor system of Gymnotus carapo

2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (9) ◽  
pp. 1433-1446 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Electric Organ Discharge ◽  
Amplitude Ratio ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Electromotor System ◽  
Phase Amplitude ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Induced Changes ◽  
Weakly Electric

During their entire lives, weakly electric fish produce an uninterrupted train of discharges to electrolocate objects and to communicate. In an attempt to learn about activity-dependent processes that might be involved in this ability, the continuous train of discharges of intact Gymnotus carapo was experimentally interrupted to investigate how this pausing affects post-pause electric organ discharges. In particular, an analysis was conducted of how the amplitude and relative timing of the three major deflections of the complex discharge change over the course of the first 1000 post-pause discharges. The dependence of these variables on the duration of the preceding pause and on water temperature is analysed. In addition, pause-induced small reverberations at the end of the discharge are described. Common to all amplitude changes is a fast initial decrease in amplitude with a slow recovery phase; amplitude changes scale with the duration of the preceding pause and are independent of the interdischarge interval. The absence of changes in the postsynaptic-potential-derived first phase of the discharge together with changes in the amplitude ratio of the third and fourth deflections suggest that the amplitude changes are mainly due to pause-induced changes in the inner resistance of the electric organ. A model is formulated that approximates the pattern of amplitude changes. The post-pause changes described here may provide a new way to test current models of complex discharge generation in Gymnotus carapo and illustrate the speed at which changes of an electric organ discharge can take place.

scholarly journals Count and spark? The echo response of the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii to series of pulses

2001 ◽  
Vol 204 (8) ◽  
pp. 1401-1412
Author(s):  
S. Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Electric Fish ◽  
Electric Organ ◽  
Weakly Electric Fish ◽  
Simple Strategy ◽  
Mormyrid Fish ◽  
Pulse Type ◽  
After Effect ◽  
Electric Organ Discharges ◽  
Weakly Electric ◽  
Gnathonemus Petersii

Weakly electric fish of the pulse type electrolocate objects in the dark by emitting discrete electric organ discharges (EODs) separated by intervals of silence. Two neighbouring pulse-type fish often reduce the risk of discharging simultaneously by means of an ‘echo response’: one fish will respond to a neighbour's EOD with a discharge of its own following at a fixed short latency so that its EOD will occur long before the next EOD of its neighbour. Although working elegantly for two partners, this simple strategy should fail in larger groups because two fish could discharge in response to the same EOD of a third fish. Here, I show that the mormyrid fish Gnathonemus petersii could use a simple mechanism to reduce this problem. Individuals were stimulated with two closely spaced pulses, the second following so as to coincide with an echo given in response to the first. All the fish examined were able to respond more to the second pulse so that most of their echoes did not collide with the second pulse. An analysis was made of how echoing more to the second pulse depends on (i) the delay at which the stimulus followed the last spontaneous EOD, (ii) the spontaneous firing rate, (iii) the intensity of the stimulus, (iv) the number of stimulus pulses, (v) the interval between stimulus pulses, and (vi) the level of previous stimulation with double pulses. The results suggest that echoing more in response to the second pulse is probably because the first pulse causes an after-effect whose inferred properties would be compatible with the properties of the mormyromast afferences thought to be involved in the echo response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document