scholarly journals In vivo X-ray diffraction and simultaneous EMG reveal the time course of myofilament lattice dilation and filament stretch

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (17) ◽  
pp. jeb224188
Author(s):  
Sage A. Malingen ◽  
Anthony M. Asencio ◽  
Julie A. Cass ◽  
Weikang Ma ◽  
Thomas C. Irving ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMuscle function within an organism depends on the feedback between molecular and meter-scale processes. Although the motions of muscle's contractile machinery are well described in isolated preparations, only a handful of experiments have documented the kinematics of the lattice occurring when multi-scale interactions are fully intact. We used time-resolved X-ray diffraction to record the kinematics of the myofilament lattice within a normal operating context: the tethered flight of Manduca sexta. As the primary flight muscles of M.sexta are synchronous, we used these results to reveal the timing of in vivo cross-bridge recruitment, which occurred 24 ms (s.d. 26) following activation. In addition, the thick filaments stretched an average of 0.75% (s.d. 0.32) and thin filaments stretched 1.11% (s.d. 0.65). In contrast to other in vivo preparations, lattice spacing changed an average of 2.72% (s.d. 1.47). Lattice dilation of this magnitude significantly affects shortening velocity and force generation, and filament stretching tunes force generation. While the kinematics were consistent within individual trials, there was extensive variation between trials. Using a mechanism-free machine learning model we searched for patterns within and across trials. Although lattice kinematics were predictable within trials, the model could not create predictions across trials. This indicates that the variability we see across trials may be explained by latent variables occurring in this naturally functioning system. The diverse kinematic combinations we documented mirror muscle's adaptability and may facilitate its robust function in unpredictable conditions.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
SA Malingen ◽  
AM Asencio ◽  
JA Cass ◽  
W Ma ◽  
TC Irving ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMuscle’s function within an organism depends on the feedback between molecular to meter-scale processes. While the motions of muscle’s contractile machinery are well described in isolated preparations, only a handful of experiments have documented the kinematics of the lattice occurring when multi-scale interactions are fully intact. We used time-resolved x-ray diffraction to record the kinematics of the myofilament lattice within a normal operating context: the tethered flight of Manduca sexta. Since the primary flight muscles of Manduca sexta are synchronous, we used these results to reveal the timing of in vivo cross-bridge recruitment, which occurred 24 (s.d. 26) ms following activation. In addition, the thick filaments stretched an average of 0.75 (s.d. 0.32)% and thin filaments stretched 1.11 (s.d. 0.65)%. In contrast to other in vivo preparations, lattice spacing changed an average of 2.72 (s.d. 1.47)%. Lattice dilation of this magnitude significantly impacts shortening velocity and force generation, and filament stretching tunes force generation. While kinematics were consistent within individual trials, there was extensive variation between trials. Using a mechanism-free machine learning model we searched for patterns within and across trials. While lattice kinematics were predictable within trials, the model could not create predictions across trials. This indicates that the variability we see across trials may be explained by latent variables occurring in this naturally functioning system. The diverse kinematic combinations we documented mirror muscle’s adaptability and may facilitate its robust function in unpredictable conditions.


2013 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 485a-486a ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom L. Daniel ◽  
Nicole T. George ◽  
C. David Williams ◽  
Thomas C. Irving

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mandal ◽  
B. J. Jensen ◽  
M. C. Hudspeth ◽  
S. Root ◽  
R. S. Crum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. J. Méndez ◽  
F. Trybel ◽  
R. J. Husband ◽  
G. Steinle-Neumann ◽  
H.-P. Liermann ◽  
...  

Polymer ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 42 (21) ◽  
pp. 8965-8973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Gang Wang ◽  
Xuehui Wang ◽  
Benjamin S. Hsiao ◽  
Saša Andjelić ◽  
Dennis Jamiolkowski ◽  
...  

Carbon ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 246-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Périne Landois ◽  
Mathieu Pinault ◽  
Stéphan Rouzière ◽  
Dominique Porterat ◽  
Cristian Mocuta ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 419-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Buschert ◽  
R. Colella

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (19) ◽  
pp. 5980-5981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Coppens ◽  
Ivan I. Vorontsov ◽  
Timothy Graber ◽  
Andrey Yu. Kovalevsky ◽  
Yu-Sheng Chen ◽  
...  

AIP Advances ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 072127 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Reusch ◽  
F. Schülein ◽  
C. Bömer ◽  
M. Osterhoff ◽  
A. Beerlink ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document