scholarly journals Considerations on the role of olfactory input in avian navigation

2017 ◽  
Vol 220 (23) ◽  
pp. 4347-4350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roswitha Wiltschko ◽  
Wolfgang Wiltschko
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 745-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo E. Jorge ◽  
Paulo A.M. Marques ◽  
Belmiro V. Pinto ◽  
John B. Phillips

2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 139-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Camilieri-Asch ◽  
Kara E. Yopak ◽  
Alethea Rea ◽  
Jonathan D. Mitchell ◽  
Julian C. Partridge ◽  
...  

The volume of the olfactory bulbs (OBs) relative to the brain has been used previously as a proxy for olfactory capabilities in many vertebrate taxa, including fishes. Although this gross approach has predictive power, a more accurate assessment of the number of afferent olfactory inputs and the convergence of this information at the level of the telencephalon is critical to our understanding of the role of olfaction in the behaviour of fishes. In this study, we used transmission electron microscopy to assess the number of first-order axons within the olfactory nerve (ON) and the number of second-order axons in the olfactory peduncle (OP) in established model species within cartilaginous (brownbanded bamboo shark, <i>Chiloscyllium punctatum</i> [CP]) and bony (common goldfish, <i>Carassius auratus</i> [CA]) fishes. The total number of axons varied from a mean of 18.12 ± 7.50 million in the ON to a mean of 0.38 ± 0.21 million in the OP of CP, versus 0.48 ± 0.16 million in the ON and 0.09 ± 0.02 million in the OP of CA. This resulted in a convergence ratio of approximately 50:1 and 5:1, respectively, for these two species. Based on astroglial ensheathing, axon type (unmyelinated [UM] and myelinated [M]) and axon size, we found no differentiated tracts in the OP of CP, whereas a lateral and a medial tract (both of which could be subdivided into two bundles or areas) were identified for CA, as previously described. Linear regression analyses revealed significant differences not only in axon density between species and locations (nerves and peduncles), but also in axon type and axon diameter (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). However, UM axon diameter was larger in the OPs than in the nerve in both species (<i>p</i> = 0.005), with no significant differences in UM axon diameter in the ON (<i>p</i> = 0.06) between species. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the neuroanatomical organisation of the ascending olfactory pathway in two fish taxa and a quantitative anatomical comparison of the summation of olfactory information. Our results support the assertion that relative OB volume is a good indicator of the level of olfactory input and thereby a proxy for olfactory capabilities.


1996 ◽  
Vol 199 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Wiltschko

In 1972, Papi and his colleagues reported that anosmic pigeons were severely impaired in orientation and homing performance. This observation was followed up in a series of experiments involving numerous elaborate experimental manipulations. On the basis of their results, the hypothesis of olfactory navigation was proposed. Attempts to replicate these findings at other lofts produced widely differing effects, which suggested a highly variable role of olfaction. However, meteorological data, as well as certain other aspects of the findings, throw doubt on the role of odours as navigational cues. (1) Odours of the required characteristics and distribution do not seem to exist. (2) Some effects of 'olfactory' manipulations do not seem to depend on the availability of odours. (3) Olfactory treatments proved mostly effective, but often the effect was not as predicted. In view of these findings, explanations other than olfactory orientation cannot be excluded; accepting olfactory input as navigational information seems premature. Some of the findings are in agreement with the assumption that olfactory manipulations impair the birds' general processing and integration of information in some unknown way.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefen Beeler-Duden ◽  
Meltem Yucel ◽  
Amrisha Vaish

Abstract Tomasello offers a compelling account of the emergence of humans’ sense of obligation. We suggest that more needs to be said about the role of affect in the creation of obligations. We also argue that positive emotions such as gratitude evolved to encourage individuals to fulfill cooperative obligations without the negative quality that Tomasello proposes is inherent in obligations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Whiten

Abstract The authors do the field of cultural evolution a service by exploring the role of non-social cognition in human cumulative technological culture, truly neglected in comparison with socio-cognitive abilities frequently assumed to be the primary drivers. Some specifics of their delineation of the critical factors are problematic, however. I highlight recent chimpanzee–human comparative findings that should help refine such analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document