scholarly journals Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion

2003 ◽  
Vol 206 (17) ◽  
pp. 3065-3083 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sun
2002 ◽  
Vol 205 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Sun ◽  
Jian Tang

SUMMARY A computational fluid-dynamic analysis was conducted to study the unsteady aerodynamics of a model fruit fly wing. The wing performs an idealized flapping motion that emulates the wing motion of a fruit fly in normal hovering flight. The Navier–Stokes equations are solved numerically. The solution provides the flow and pressure fields, from which the aerodynamic forces and vorticity wake structure are obtained. Insights into the unsteady aerodynamic force generation process are gained from the force and flow-structure information. Considerable lift can be produced when the majority of the wing rotation is conducted near the end of a stroke or wing rotation precedes stroke reversal (rotation advanced), and the mean lift coefficient can be more than twice the quasi-steady value. Three mechanisms are responsible for the large lift: the rapid acceleration of the wing at the beginning of a stroke, the absence of stall during the stroke and the fast pitching-up rotation of the wing near the end of the stroke. When half the wing rotation is conducted near the end of a stroke and half at the beginning of the next stroke (symmetrical rotation), the lift at the beginning and near the end of a stroke becomes smaller because the effects of the first and third mechanisms above are reduced. The mean lift coefficient is smaller than that of the rotation-advanced case, but is still 80 % larger than the quasi-steady value. When the majority of the rotation is delayed until the beginning of the next stroke (rotation delayed), the lift at the beginning and near the end of a stroke becomes very small or even negative because the effect of the first mechanism above is cancelled and the third mechanism does not apply in this case. The mean lift coefficient is much smaller than in the other two cases.


Fluids ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Pohly ◽  
James Salmon ◽  
James Bluman ◽  
Kabilan Nedunchezian ◽  
Chang-kwon Kang

Various tools have been developed to model the aerodynamics of flapping wings. In particular, quasi-steady models, which are considerably faster and easier to solve than the Navier–Stokes equations, are often utilized in the study of flight dynamics of flapping wing flyers. However, the accuracy of the quasi-steady models has not been properly documented. The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of a quasi-steady model by comparing the resulting aerodynamic forces against three-dimensional (3D) Navier–Stokes solutions. The same wing motion is prescribed at a fruit fly scale. The pitching amplitude, axis, and duration are varied. Comparison of the aerodynamic force coefficients suggests that the quasi-steady model shows significant discrepancies under extreme pitching motions, i.e., the pitching motion is large, quick, and occurs about the leading or trailing edge. The differences are as large as 1.7 in the cycle-averaged lift coefficient. The quasi-steady model performs well when the kinematics are mild, i.e., the pitching motion is small, long, and occurs near the mid-chord with a small difference in the lift coefficient of 0.01. Our analysis suggests that the main source for the error is the inaccuracy of the rotational lift term and the inability to model the wing-wake interaction in the quasi-steady model.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1785-1794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jr-Ming Miao ◽  
Wei-Hsin Sun ◽  
Chang-Hsien Tai

AIAA Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1532-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Sun ◽  
Xin Yu

1989 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. ROLAND ENNOS

Seven representative species of the order Diptera were filmed in free flight using high-speed cinematography. Insects were killed after filming, and morphological measurements were made in the manner of Ellington (1984b). The detailed kinematics of selected sequences were then found using frame-by-frame digitization, followed by computer reconstruction of the third dimension. Kinematics were qualitatively similar to those observed by Ellington (1984c), though in three species the wings often underwent ventral flexion near the base at the end of the downstroke. For aerodynamic analysis of hovering flight, modified forms of the equations of Ellington (1984e,f) were used. Forward flight was analysed by a novel method, which assumes that an equal but opposite circulation is built up for each half-stroke and allows linear equations to be used. The lift coefficients calculated for hovering were commonly well above those possible by quasi-steady mechanisms, but rotational coefficients were within those that could be achieved by the unsteady lift mechanisms: clap-and-fling (Weis-Fogh, 1973) and flex (Ellington, 1984d). The lift and rotational coefficients of the two half-strokes were often unequal. In forward flight, the equal circulation assumption often led to an incorrect estimation of the aerodynamic force vector, showing that the circulations during the two half-strokes were unequal. It is suggested that flies manoeuvre largely by altering the unsteady circulations produced at stroke reversal via alterations in the speed and timing of wing rotation. The differences in the mechanisms used by different fly species are related to their flight behaviour in the field.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Jung Hsu ◽  
Neel Thakur ◽  
Bo Cheng

Flies fly at a broad range of speeds and produce sophisticated aerial maneuvers with precisely controlled wing movements. Remarkably, only subtle changes in wing motion are used by flies to produce aerial maneuvers, resulting in little directional tilt of aerodynamic force vector relative to the body. Therefore, it is often considered that flies fly according to a helicopter model and control speed mainly via force-vectoring enabled primarily by body-pitch change. Here we examine the speed control of blue bottle flies using a magnetically-levitated (MAGLEV) flight mill, as they fly at different body pitch and with different augmented aerodynamic damping. We identify wing kinematic contributors to the changes of estimated aerodynamic force through testing two force-vectoring models. Results show that in addition to body pitch, flies also use a collection of wing kinematic variables to control both force magnitude and direction, the roles of which are analogous to those of throttle, collective and cyclic pitch of helicopters. Our results also suggest that the MAGLEV flight mill system can be potentially used to study the roles of visual and mechanosensory feedback in insect flight control.


Author(s):  
Alok A. Rege ◽  
Brian H. Dennis ◽  
Kamesh Subbarao

Insect flight comes with lot of intricacies that cannot be explained by conventional aerodynamics. Insects rely on a peculiar high frequency wing flapping mechanism to produce the aerodynamic forces required for sustainable flight. Broad study of this mechanism for producing forces is imperative to attain a reasonably accurate representation of these forces. In this research, sensitivity analysis is performed on the factors governing the aerodynamic force production due to flapping motion of a two-dimensional wing section of a Micro Air Vehicle (MAV). Published results obtained on a wing section of an MAV model by the authors in their previous work are used for preliminary review. The flapping path parameters are nondimensionalized and the moving mesh problem is solved in a numerical flow solver. A thorough sensitivity analysis is done to realize the effects of the flapping wing Reynolds number, Strouhal number, and the absolute angle of attack on the force generation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document