scholarly journals In ultraviolet microbeam irradiations, characteristics of the monochromator and lamp affect the spectral composition of the ultraviolet light and probably the biological results

1991 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-422
Author(s):  
A. Forer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Spectral Distribution ◽  
Spectral Composition ◽  
Band Width ◽  
Microbeam Irradiation ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
Spectral Distributions

Biological conclusions recently published concerning ultraviolet (u.v.) microbeam irradiation of spindles are different from those we previously published. Several technical differences between the two sets of experiments were investigated. The spectral distributions in the light emitted from mercury-arc, xenon-mercury-arc, and xenon-arc lamps were measured, as were the spectral distributions after the light from these lamps passed through a monochromator that was set to various wavelengths and various half-band-widths. Both the source of the u.v. light and the half-band-width of the monochromator influence the spectral distribution of the light leaving the monochromator: depending on the conditions, the light leaving the monochromator is not necessarily of the same wavelength as that to which the monochromator is set. Differences in these aspects of the experiments could easily give rise to the different biological conclusions reached in the two sets of experiments.

Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres in Haemanthus katherinae endosperm. I. Behaviour of the irradiated region

1993 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 571-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.B. Czaban ◽  
A. Forer ◽  
A.S. Bajer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Spindle Fibre ◽  
Microbeam Irradiation ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
Spindle Fibres

We used an ultraviolet microbeam to irradiate chromosomal spindle fibres in metaphase Haemanthus endosperm cells. An area of reduced birefringence (ARB) was formed at the position of the focussed ultraviolet light with all wavelengths we used (260, 270, 280, and 290 nm). The chromosomal spindle fibre regions (kinetochore microtubules) poleward from the ARBs were unstable: they shortened (from the ARB to the pole) either too fast for us to measure or at rates of about 40 microns per minute. The chromosomal spindle fibre regions (kinetochore microtubules) kinetochore-ward from the ARBs were stable: they did not change length for about 80 seconds, and then they increased in length at rates of about 0.7 microns per minute. The lengthening chromosomal spindle fibres sometimes grew in a direction different from that of the original chromosomal spindle fibre. The chromosome associated with the irradiated spindle fibre sometimes moved off the equator a few micrometers, towards the non-irradiated half-spindle. We discuss our results in relation to other results in the literature and conclude that kinetochores and poles influence the behaviour of kinetochore microtubules.

The behaviour of microtubules in chromosomal spindle fibres irradiated singly or doubly with ultraviolet light

1989 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-634
Author(s):  
P. Wilson ◽  
A. Forer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Single Fibre ◽  
The Other ◽  
Microbeam Irradiation ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
Spindle Fibres

Areas of reduced birefringence (ARBs) produced by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation are areas of depolymerized microtubules. ARBs probably move poleward either by microtubule subunit addition at the kinetochore and loss at the pole, or by microtubule subunit addition at one edge of the ARB and loss from the other edge. In this paper we have used two approaches to try to distinguish between these two models. First, we determined whether the edges of the ARB move at the same rate; if ARB motion is due solely to addition at the kinetochore and loss at the pole, with the ARB edges unable to exchange subunits, then the two edges of each ARB should move at the same rate. On the other hand, if the exchange is at the ARB edges, then, from data from microtubules in vitro, the poleward edge should move much faster than the kinetochoreward edge. We found that the two edges of the ARB move at the same rate about half the time, but half the time they do not. Second, we studied the behaviour of two ARBs on a single fibre. If ARB motion is due solely to subunit addition at the kinetochore and loss at the pole, then the two ARBs must move poleward together. We found that after two ARBs are formed on a single fibre the region between the ARBs is unstable and rapidly depolymerizes. These results do not fit either model and suggest that influences of kinetochores and poles or other factors need to be considered that are not duplicated in experiments on microtubules in vitro.

Analysis of chromosome movement in crane fly spermatocytes by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of individual chromosomal spindle fibres. I. General results

1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 770-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy J. Sillers ◽  
Arthur Forer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Monochromatic Light ◽  
The Other ◽  
Spindle Fibre ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Opposite Pole ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Spindle Fibres

Single chromosomal spindle fibres in anaphase Nephrotoma ferruginea (crane fly) spermatocytes were irradiated with monochromatic ultraviolet light focussed to a 4-μm spot by means of an ultraviolet microbeam apparatus. The movement of the half-bivalent associated with the irradiated spindle fibre was either unaffected or the half-bivalent stopped moving; i.e., the effect was all-or-none. When the half-bivalent associated with the irradiated spindle fibre did stop moving, the partner half-bivalent moving towards the opposite pole (i.e., the half-bivalent with which the first half-bivalent was previously paired) also stopped moving: all other half-bivalents moved normally. In over 90% of the 69 cases the movements of the two half-bivalents were only temporarily blocked; when movement resumed both half-bivalents resumed movement at the same time, after stoppage times ranging from 2 min to more than 15 min. In a few cases the half-bivalents never resumed poleward motion.When half-bivalents that had stopped movement finally resumed movement they often did not reach the poles; i.e., they "lagged" and remained separate from the other chromosomes. This result occurred only in spermatocytes of N. ferruginea. In spermatocytes of N. suturalis or N. abbreviata, on the other hand, the stopped half-bivalents did not lag but always reached the poles.Half-bivalent pairs that stopped moving in N. ferruginea spermatocytes did so for shorter times than did those previously reported (after irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres) in N. suturalis spermatocytes. We suggest that the difference is due to our use of monochromatic ultraviolet light as opposed to the previous use of heterochromatic ultraviolet light. We assume that different wavelengths of monochromatic light produce different effects, that any given monochromatic irradiation produces only one effect (albeit different effects at different wavelengths), but that heterochromatic irradiations can produce multiple effects.Irradiation of the interzone (between separating half-bivalents) had no effect on the chromosome-to-pole movements of the half-bivalents. Therefore the stoppage of movement of half-bivalent pairs is specific for irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres. On the other hand, irradiation of the interzone often blocked pole-to-pole elongation.

Irradiations of rabbit myofibrils with an ultraviolet microbeam. I. Effects of ultraviolet light on the myofibril components necessary for contraction

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Wilson ◽  
Arthur Forer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Thin Filament ◽  
Primary Effect ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Rabbit Psoas ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
Filament Structure ◽  
Wavelength Light

Glycerinated rabbit psoas myofibrils, F-actin, and myofibril ghosts were irradiated with ultraviolet light (UV) to investigate how UV blocks myofibril contraction. Myofibril contraction is most sensitive to 270- and 290-nm wavelength light. We irradiated I and A bands separately with 270- and 290-nm wavelength light using a UV microbeam and constructed dose-response curves for blocking sarcomere contraction. For both wavelengths, irradiations of A bands required less energy per area to block contraction than did irradiations of I bands, suggesting that the primary effects of both 270- and 290-nm wavelength light in stopping myofibril contraction are on myosin. We investigated whether the primary effect of UV in blocking I-band contraction is the depolymerization of actin by comparing the relative sensitivities of I-band contraction, F-actin depolymerization, and thin filament depolymerization to 270- and 290-nm light. We also compared the dose of UV required to depolymerize F-actin in solution with the dose needed to block I-band contraction and the dose required to alter thin filament structure in myofibril ghosts. The results confirm that UV blocks I-band contraction by depolymerizing actin. We discuss how the results might be relevant to the hypothesis that an actomyosin-based system is involved in chromosome movement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document