The Effect of 2-Phenyl Ethanol on the DNA Synthesis Cycle of Schizosaccharomyces Pombe

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 523-530
Author(s):  
C. J. BOSTOCK

The effect of different concentrations of 2-phenyl ethanol (PE) on growth and DNA synthesis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is described. o.3% PE inhibits the entry of cells into S phase, but allows a doubling in the number of cells in the culture. The effect of o.2% PE on random and synchronous cultures of S. pombe shows that, in the continued presence of the inhibitor, the S phase is moved to a different point in the cell cycle. Cells continue to grow in the presence of o.2% PE with a G1 phase occupying a significant portion of the cell cycle. This differs from normal growth when the G1 phase is absent.

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 475-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. al-Khodairy ◽  
T. Enoch ◽  
I.M. Hagan ◽  
A.M. Carr

Normal eukaryotic cells do not enter mitosis unless DNA is fully replicated and repaired. Controls called ‘checkpoints’, mediate cell cycle arrest in response to unreplicated or damaged DNA. Two independent Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutant screens, both of which aimed to isolate new elements involved in checkpoint controls, have identified alleles of the hus5+ gene that are abnormally sensitive to both inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to ionizing radiation. We have cloned and sequenced the hus5+ gene. It is a novel member of the E2 family of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (UBCs). To understand the role of hus5+ in cell cycle control we have characterized the phenotypes of the hus5 mutants and the hus5 gene disruption. We find that, whilst the mutants are sensitive to inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to irradiation, this is not due to an inability to undergo mitotic arrest. Thus, the hus5+ gene product is not directly involved in checkpoint control. However, in common with a large class of previously characterized checkpoint genes, it is required for efficient recovery from DNA damage or S-phase arrest and manifests a rapid death phenotype in combination with a temperature sensitive S phase and late S/G2 phase cdc mutants. In addition, hus5 deletion mutants are severely impaired in growth and exhibit high levels of abortive mitoses, suggesting a role for hus5+ in chromosome segregation. We conclude that this novel UBC enzyme plays multiple roles and is virtually essential for cell proliferation.


1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814
Author(s):  
J Campisi ◽  
A B Pardee

The control of eucaryotic cell proliferation is governed largely by a series of regulatory events which occur in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. When stimulated to proliferate, quiescent (G0) 3T3 fibroblasts require transcription, rapid translation, and three growth factors for the growth state transition. We examined exponentially growing 3T3 cells to relate the requirements for G1 transit to those necessary for the transition from the G0 to the S phase. Cycling cells in the G1 phase required transcription, rapid translation, and a single growth factor (insulin-like growth factor [IGF] I) to initiate DNA synthesis. IGF I acted post-transcriptionally at a late G1 step. All cells in the G1 phase entered the S phase on schedule if either insulin (hyperphysiological concentration) or IGF I (subnanomolar concentration) was provided as the sole growth factor. In medium lacking all growth factors, only cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were able to initiate DNA synthesis. Similarly, cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were less dependent on transcription and translation for entry into the S phase. Cells responded very differently to inhibited translation than to growth factor deprivation. Cells in the early and mid-G1 phases did not progress toward the S phase during transcriptional or translational inhibition, and during translational inhibition they actually regressed from the S phase. In the absence of growth factors, however, these cells continued progressing toward the S phase, but still required IGF at a terminal step before initiating DNA synthesis. We conclude that a suboptimal condition causes cells to either progress or regress in the cell cycle rather than freezing them at their initial position. By using synchronized cultures, we also show that in contrast to earlier events, this final, IGF-dependent step did not require new transcription. This result is in contrast to findings that other growth factors induce new transcription. We examined the requirements for G1 transit by using a chemically transformed 3T3 cell line (BPA31 cells) which has lost some but not all ability to regulate its growth. Early- and mid-G1-phase BPA31 cells required transcription and translation to initiate DNA synthesis, although they did not regress from the S phase during translational inhibition. However, these cells did not need IGF for entry into the S phase.


1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 939-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.R. Carlson ◽  
B. Grallert ◽  
T. Stokke ◽  
E. Boye

Cells of Schizosaccharomyces pombe were grown in minimal medium with different nitrogen sources under steady-state conditions, with doubling times ranging from 2.5 to 14 hours. Flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy confirmed earlier findings that at rapid growth rates, the G1 phase was short and cell separation occurred at the end of S phase. For some nitrogen sources, the growth rate was greatly decreased, the G1 phase occupied 30–50% of the cell cycle, and cell separation occurred in early G1. In contrast, other nitrogen sources supported low growth rates without any significant increase in G1 duration. The method described allows manipulation of the length of G1 and the relative cell cycle position of S phase in wild-type cells. Cell mass was measured by flow cytometry as scattered light and as protein-associated fluorescence. The extensions of G1 were not related to cell mass at entry into S phase. Our data do not support the hypothesis that the cells must reach a certain fixed, critical mass before entry into S. We suggest that cell mass at the G1/S transition point is variable and determined by a set of molecular parameters. In the present experiments, these parameters were influenced by the different nitrogen sources in a way that was independent of the actual growth rate.


Development ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-175
Author(s):  
M. Maden

It is shown here that amputated and denervated limbs of larval axolotls dedifferentiate and a proportion of the cells released undergo DNA synthesis and mitosis. When the limb is denervated prior to amputation fewer cells go through the cell cycle, implying the existence of a pool of trophic factor in the limb. Recent work has demonstrated that denervated blastemal cells accumulate in the G1 phase of the cycle. These results strongly argue against the theory that the trophic factor controls the G2 phase. Rather, it is proposed that this factor regulates either the total number of cells cycling or the rate at which they cycle by varying the length of the G1 phase.


1978 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 399-411
Author(s):  
J. Creanor

Oxygen uptake was measured in synchronous cultures of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The rate of oxygen uptake was found to increase in a step-wise manner at the beginning of the cycle and again in the middle of the cycle. The increases in rate were such that overall, oxygen uptake doubled in rate once per cell cycle. Addition of inhibitors of DNA synthesis or nuclear division to a synchronous culture did not affect the uptake of oxygen. In an induced synchronous culture, in which DNA synthesis, cell division, and nuclear division, but not ‘growth’ were synchronized, oxygen uptake increased continuously in rate and did not show the step-wise rises which were shown in the selection-synchronized culture. These results were compared with previous measurements of oxygen uptake in yeast and an explanation is suggested for the many different patterns which have been reported.


1976 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-521
Author(s):  
R.S. Fraser ◽  
F. Moreno

The rates of polyadenylated messenger RNA and ribosomal RNA synthesis were measured in synchronously dividing cultures of fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe). Control asynchronous cultures, which had been exposed to the conditions used for preparing synchronous cultures, were investigated to check for effects of the synchronization procedure itself on RNA synthesis. After each period of DNA synthesis in synchronous culture, the rates of messenger and ribosomal RNA synthesis doubled, suggesting that gene number controls the rate of messenger and ribosomal RNA synthesis. This was confirmed by experiments with asynchronous, exponential-phase cultures in which DNA synthesis was inhibited by hydroxyurea. Both synchronous culture and hydroxyurea experiments suggested that there is a delay of 15 min (0-1 of the cell generation time) between replication of the DNA and transcription of both gene copies. A pattern of protein accumulation was calculated from changes in the rate of polyadenylated messenger RNA synthesis during synchronous culture. The simulated pattern indicates that protein is accumulated linearly, with a doubling in the rate of accumulation once per cell cycle. The simulated pattern of protein accumulation is very similar to measurements previously reported by other workers of changes in activities of 3 enzymes in synchronous cultures. It is suggested that the doubling of the rate of messenger RNA synthesis, as a consequence of the replication of the DNA once per cycle, provides the basis of a mechanism for control of the doubling of other cellular constituents during the cell cycle.


1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 705-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Thorburn ◽  
P A Walton ◽  
J R Feramisco

In studying the mechanism through which the myogenic determination protein MyoD prevents entry into the S phase of the cell cycle, we have found a relationship between MyoD and the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor protein. By direct needle microinjection of purified recombinant MyoD protein into quiescent fibroblasts, which were then induced to proliferate by serum, we found that MyoD arrested progression of the cell cycle, in agreement with studies utilizing expression constructs for MyoD. By studying temporal changes in cells injected with MyoD protein, it was found that MyoD did not prevent serum induced expression of the protooncogene c-Fos, an event that occurs in the G0 to G1 transition of the cycle. Injection of the MyoD protein as late as 8 h after the addition of serum still caused an inhibition in DNA synthesis, suggesting that MyoD inhibits the G1 to S transition as opposed to the G0 to G1 transition. MyoD injection did not prevent the expression of cyclin A. However MyoD injection did result in a block in the increase in Rb extractibility normally seen in late G1 phase cells. As this phenomenon is associated with the hyperphosphorylation of Rb at this point in the cell cycle and is correlated with progression into S phase, this provides further evidence that MyoD blocks the cycle late in G1.


1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Campisi ◽  
A B Pardee

The control of eucaryotic cell proliferation is governed largely by a series of regulatory events which occur in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. When stimulated to proliferate, quiescent (G0) 3T3 fibroblasts require transcription, rapid translation, and three growth factors for the growth state transition. We examined exponentially growing 3T3 cells to relate the requirements for G1 transit to those necessary for the transition from the G0 to the S phase. Cycling cells in the G1 phase required transcription, rapid translation, and a single growth factor (insulin-like growth factor [IGF] I) to initiate DNA synthesis. IGF I acted post-transcriptionally at a late G1 step. All cells in the G1 phase entered the S phase on schedule if either insulin (hyperphysiological concentration) or IGF I (subnanomolar concentration) was provided as the sole growth factor. In medium lacking all growth factors, only cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were able to initiate DNA synthesis. Similarly, cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were less dependent on transcription and translation for entry into the S phase. Cells responded very differently to inhibited translation than to growth factor deprivation. Cells in the early and mid-G1 phases did not progress toward the S phase during transcriptional or translational inhibition, and during translational inhibition they actually regressed from the S phase. In the absence of growth factors, however, these cells continued progressing toward the S phase, but still required IGF at a terminal step before initiating DNA synthesis. We conclude that a suboptimal condition causes cells to either progress or regress in the cell cycle rather than freezing them at their initial position. By using synchronized cultures, we also show that in contrast to earlier events, this final, IGF-dependent step did not require new transcription. This result is in contrast to findings that other growth factors induce new transcription. We examined the requirements for G1 transit by using a chemically transformed 3T3 cell line (BPA31 cells) which has lost some but not all ability to regulate its growth. Early- and mid-G1-phase BPA31 cells required transcription and translation to initiate DNA synthesis, although they did not regress from the S phase during translational inhibition. However, these cells did not need IGF for entry into the S phase.


1986 ◽  
Vol 239 (3) ◽  
pp. 745-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Panet ◽  
D Snyder ◽  
H Atlan

In this study we tested the hypothesis that stimulation of univalent-cation fluxes which follow the addition of growth factors are required for cell transition through the G1-phase of the cell cycle. The effect of two drugs, amiloride and bumetanide, were tested on exit of BALB/c 3T3 cells from G0/G1-phase and entry into S-phase (DNA synthesis). Amiloride, an inhibitor of the Na+/H+ antiport, only partially inhibited DNA synthesis induced by serum. Bumetanide, an inhibitor of the Na+/K+ co-transport, only slightly suppressed DNA synthesis by itself, but when added together with amiloride completely blocked cell transition through G1 and entry into S-phase. Similar inhibitory effects of the two drugs were found on the induction of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) (a marker of mid-G1-phase) in synchronized cells stimulated by either partially purified fibroblast growth factor (FGF) or serum. To test this hypothesis further, cells arrested in G0/G1 were stimulated by serum, insulin or FGF. All induced similar elevations of cellular K+ content during the early G1-phase of the cell cycle. However, serum and FGF, but not insulin, released the cells from the G0/G1 arrest, as measured by ODC enzyme induction. This result implies that the increase in cellular K+ content may be necessary but not sufficient for induction of early events during the G1-phase. The synergistic inhibitory effects of amiloride and bumetanide on the two activities stimulated by serum growth factors, namely ODC induction (mid-G1) and thymidine incorporation into DNA (S-phase), suggested that the amiloride-sensitive Na+/H+ antiport system together with the bumetanide-sensitive Na+/K+ transporter play a role in the mitogenic signal.


1978 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 385-397
Author(s):  
J. Creanor

The rate of CO2 evolution was measured in synchronous cultures of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe growing in a minimal medium. The rate of CO2 evolution was found to double sharply at about the time of nuclear division (0.75 of the way through the cell cycle). For the remainder of the cell cycle the rate remained constant. Addition of inhibitors of DNA synthesis or nuclear division did not affect the pattern of CO2 evolution in synchronous cultures. Similarly, in an induced synchronous culture, in which DNA synthesis, nuclear division and cell division—but not growth, were synchronized, CO2 evolution showed a continuous pattern and not the step-wise increase associated with the normal synchronous cultures. When S. pombe was grown in a complete medium, the evolution of CO2 in a synchronous cultures was shown to increase in a continuous manner but at a rate faster than the growth of the culture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document