scholarly journals Overexpression of the SuUR gene induces reversible modifications at pericentric, telomeric and intercalary heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes

2003 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. F. Zhimulev
Chromosoma ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
pp. 377-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Zhimulev ◽  
E. Belyaeva ◽  
I. Makunin ◽  
V. Pirrotta ◽  
E. Volkova ◽  
...  

Chromosoma ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry E. Koryakov ◽  
Gunter Reuter ◽  
Patrizio Dimitri ◽  
Igor F. Zhimulev

Chromosoma ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Belyaeva ◽  
E. N. Andreyeva ◽  
S. N. Belyakin ◽  
E. I. Volkova ◽  
I. F. Zhimulev

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 1209-1220
Author(s):  
E S Belyaeva ◽  
L V Boldyreva ◽  
E I Volkova ◽  
R A Nanayev ◽  
A A Alekseyenko ◽  
...  

Abstract It has been previously shown that the SuUR gene encodes a protein located in intercalary and pericentromeric heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes. The SuUR mutation suppresses the formation of ectopic contacts and DNA underreplication in polytene chromosomes; SuUR+ in extra doses enhances the expression of these characters. This study demonstrates that heterochromatin-dependent PEV silencing is also influenced by SuUR. The SuUR protein localizes to chromosome regions compacted as a result of PEV; the SuUR mutation suppresses DNA underreplication arising in regions of polytene chromosomes undergoing PEV. The SuUR mutation also suppresses variegation of both adult morphological characters and chromatin compaction observed in rearranged chromosomes. In contrast, SuUR+ in extra doses and its overexpression enhance variegation. Thus, SuUR affects PEV silencing in a dose-dependent manner. However, its effect is expressed weaker than that of the strong modifier Su(var)2-5.


Chromosoma ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalya G. Andreyenkova ◽  
Elena B. Kokoza ◽  
Valery F. Semeshin ◽  
Elena S. Belyaeva ◽  
Sergey A. Demakov ◽  
...  

Chromosoma ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Ananiev ◽  
V. A. Gvozdev ◽  
Yu. V. Ilyin ◽  
N. A. Tchurikov ◽  
G. P. Georgiev

2018 ◽  
Vol 479 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Khoroshko ◽  
T. Yu. Zykova ◽  
O. O. Popova ◽  
I. F. Zhimulev

Chromosoma ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 355-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena S. Belyaeva ◽  
Sergey A. Demakov ◽  
Galina V. Pokholkova ◽  
Artyom A. Alekseyenko ◽  
Tatiana D. Kolesnikova ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 426 (1) ◽  
pp. 244-246
Author(s):  
E. B. Kokoza ◽  
T. D. Kolesnikova ◽  
I. A. Zykov ◽  
E. S. Belyaeva ◽  
I. F. Zhimulev

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-204
Author(s):  
Christine Hoogland ◽  
Christian Biémont

Abstract Data of insertion site localization and site occupancy frequency of P, hobo, I, copia, mdg1, mdg3, 412, 297, and roo transposable elements (TEs) on the polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster were extracted from the literature. We show that TE insertion site number per chromosomal division was significantly correlated with the amount of DNA. The insertion site number weighted by DNA content was not correlated with recombination rate for all TEs except hobo, for which a positive correlation was detected. No global tendency emerged in the relationship between TE site occupancy frequency, weighted by DNA content, and recombination rate; a strong negative correlation was, however, found for the 3L arm. A possible dominant deleterious effect of chromosomal rearrangements due to recombination between TE insertions is thus not the main factor explaining the dynamics of TEs, since this hypothesis implies a negative relationship between recombination rate and both TE insertion site number and site occupancy frequency. The alternative hypothesis of selection against deleterious effects of insertional mutations is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document