scholarly journals HCT116 colorectal liver metastases exacerbate muscle wasting in a mouse model for the study of colorectal cancer cachexia

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. dmm043166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua R. Huot ◽  
Leah J. Novinger ◽  
Fabrizio Pin ◽  
Andrea Bonetto
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Mouse Model ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Cancer Cachexia ◽  
Muscle Wasting

scholarly journals FIRST BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON MULTIMODAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES. MODULE 1: PRE-TREATMENT EVALUATION

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe José Fernandez COIMBRA ◽  
Heber Salvador de Castro RIBEIRO ◽  
Márcio Carmona MARQUES ◽  
Paulo HERMAN ◽  
Rubens CHOJNIAK ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Multimodal Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Established Method ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Definition Of

Background : Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are frequent and potentially fatal event in the evolution of patients with these tumors. Aim : In this module, was contextualized the clinical situations and parameterized epidemiological data and results of the various treatment modalities established. Method: Was realized deep discussion on detecting and staging metastatic colorectal cancer, as well as employment of imaging methods in the evaluation of response to instituted systemic therapy. Results : The next step was based on the definition of which patients would have their metastases considered resectable and how to expand the amount of patients elegible for modalities with curative intent. Conclusion : Were presented clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, validated to be taken into account in clinical practice.

scholarly journals The kallikrein-Kinin system modulates the progression of colorectal liver metastases in a mouse model

BMC Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Luiza Nunes da Costa ◽  
David Wynne ◽  
Theodora Fifis ◽  
Linh Nguyen ◽  
Marcos Perini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mouse Model ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Kinin System ◽  
Kallikrein Kinin System

scholarly journals METACHRONOUS COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES HAS BETTER PROGNOSIS - IS IT TRUE?

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudemiro QUIREZE JUNIOR ◽  
Andressa Machado Santana BRASIL ◽  
Lúcio Kenny MORAIS ◽  
Edmond Raymond Le CAMPION ◽  
Eliseu José Fleury TAVEIRA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hepatic Metastasis ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Liver metastases from colorectal cancer are an important public health problem due to the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer worldwide. Synchronous colorectal liver metastasis has been associated with worse survival, but this prognosis is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the recurrence-free survival and overall survival between groups of patients with metachronous and synchronous colorectal hepatic metastasis. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with colorectal liver metastases seen from 2013 to 2016, divided into a metachronous and a synchronous group. The Cox regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test were used to compare survival between groups. RESULTS: The mean recurrence-free survival was 9.75 months and 50% at 1 year in the metachronous group and 19.73 months and 63.3% at 1 year in the synchronous group. The mean overall survival was 20.00 months and 6.2% at 3 years in the metachronous group and 30.39 months and 31.6% at 3 years in the synchronous group. Patients with metachronous hepatic metastasis presented worse overall survival in multivariate analysis. The use of biological drugs combined with chemotherapy was related to the best overall survival prognosis. CONCLUSION: Metachronous colorectal hepatic metastasis was associated with a worse prognosis for overall survival. There was no difference in recurrence-free survival between metachronous and synchronous metastases.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for local control of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 662-662
Author(s):  
Ji Hyeon Joo ◽  
Jong Hoon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Pattern Of Failure ◽  
N Stage ◽  
Hepatic Lesions ◽  
Significant Factors

662 Background: Although possible candidates for surgical treatment are increasing, majority of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases are ineligible for surgery. In our institution, SBRT for liver metastatic colorectal carcinoma has been adopted since 2005. By reviewing the treatment outcomes of relatively large cohorts treated with homogeneous technique, we aimed to report patterns of recurrence and the most effective dose fractionation schedule. Methods: Seventy patients with colorectal liver metastases were treated with SBRT from 2005 to 2014. Total number of treated lesions was 103. Median tumor size was 2.5 cm, with ≥ 3 cm in 42 (41%) lesions. Prescribed doses were biologically equivalent dose (BED) ≥ 112 Gy10, but, if small bowel is adjacent to target volume, dose was decreased according to the normal tissue tolerance dose. Prescription doses relevant to BED ≥ 112 Gy10 were ≥ 45 Gy in 3 fractions or ≥ 60 Gy in 5 fractions, in this study. Results: Median follow-up period was 34.2 months (range, 5.3-121.8). The 2-year local control rate was 92% when full prescription dose was delivered, and 73% if compromised dose group was included. On prognostic factor analysis for local control, N-stage (P= 0.008), and BED (P= 0.001) were significant factors. Overall survival rate was 86% for BED ≥ 112 Gy10 group, and 73% for total cohort. The major pattern of failure was out-of-field intrahepatic progression. On multivariate analysis, N stage (P= 0.001), lesion size (P= 0.010) and number of treated hepatic lesions (P< 0.001) were significant factors for intrahepatic control. Conclusions: Liver SBRT was an effective treatment option for colorectal liver metastases. If BED ≥ 112 Gy10 was delivered, we could expect long-term survival in substantial portion of patients. Major pattern of failure was out-of-field intrahepatic progression, which was related to number of treated hepatic lesions, lesion size and N-stage.

OC-092 Impact of colorectal cancer primary node status on survival following colorectal liver metastases resection

Gut ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A46.1-A46
Author(s):  
S Pathak ◽  
A AlDuwaisan ◽  
L Moore ◽  
G Dhawan ◽  
GJ Toogood
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Node Status

scholarly journals SIMULTANEOUS AND STAGED RESECTIONS FOR SYNCHRONOUS COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES: META-ANALYSIS

2017 ◽  
pp. 6-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Ponomarenko ◽  
Yu. A. Shelygin ◽  
E. G. Rybakov ◽  
S. I. Achkasov
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

AIM. To analyze the short-term and long-term outcomes two alternative surgical strategies: 1) simultaneous resections for colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases;2) conventional surgery for the primary tumor during the initial operation. After time, the liver resection is performed at a second operation METHODS. Meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes simultaneous resections for colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases and staged surgery. Tumor localization, spread and number of metastasis, extent of operation, blood loss, length of hospital stay, postop mortality, complication rates, overall survival rates were analyzed. RESULTS. Twenty-nine studies with 5518 patients were included in meta-analysis. Multiple (р=0,007) and bilobed (р=0,0004) metastasis were more often in patients in group ofstaged resections. Major hepatectomy was also performed more often in group of staged resections. There were no significant differences in blood loss and postopirative mortality rates (p>0,05). Complication rate in group of simultaneous resections was lower than in group of staged resections (0R=0,8, 95 %CI: 0,7-1.0, p=0,048). 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were similar in both groups: 54% vs 55 %, and 37% vs 38%, respectively (р=0,007). CONCLUSION. Simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and the minor liver resection or extended hepatectomy in selected patients didn’t adversely affect on complications and mortality rates in equivalent long-term survival compared to staged liver resection. An important limitation of the present study is the bias and heterogeneity in compared groups due to retrospective data over the 20-year period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document