Genes and genotypes affecting the teeth of the mouse

Development ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-159
Author(s):  
Hans Grüneberg

The teeth of mammals have been studied in great detail both by palaeontologists and by taxonomists who are interested in differences between species or higher systematic categories which are ultimately genetic in nature. By contrast, little is known about intra-specific genetic variability of the dentition. An invitation to participate in an ‘Institute for Advanced Education in Dental Research’ sponsored by the American College of Dentists provided an occasion to explore the situation in the laboratory and, presently, in the wild house mouse. The main results of this search are given in this paper. The extent of the intra-specific variance discovered may help systematists in assessing how much importance to attach to the differences they encounter; and it will be shown how easily one can be misled, in a limited sample, as to what is ‘normal’. Two characteristic dental syndromes to be described pose a new kind of problem to dental pathology.

1985 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. P. Rowe ◽  
A. Bradfield ◽  
R. J. Quy ◽  
T. Swinney

1973 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Haines ◽  
Carolyn Ciskowski ◽  
Verna Harms

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara König ◽  
Anna K. Lindholm ◽  
Patricia C. Lopes ◽  
Akos Dobay ◽  
Sally Steinert ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Widmayer ◽  
Mary Ann Handel ◽  
David L. Aylor

AbstractHybrid male sterility (HMS) contributes to reproductive isolation commonly observed among house mouse (Mus musculus) subspecies, both in the wild and in laboratory crosses. Incompatibilities involving specific Prdm9 alleles and certain Chromosome (Chr) X genotypes are known determinants of fertility and HMS, and previous work in the field has demonstrated that genetic background modifies these two major loci. We constructed hybrids that have identical genotypes at Prdm9 and identical X chromosomes, but differ widely across the rest of the genome. In each case, we crossed female PWK/PhJ mice representative of the M. m. musculus subspecies to males from a classical inbred strain representative of M. m. domesticus: 129S1/SvImJ, A/J, C57BL/6J, or DBA/2J. We detected three distinct trajectories of fertility among the hybrids using breeding experiments. The PWK129S1 males were always infertile. PWKDBA2 males were fertile, despite their genotypes at the major HMS loci. We also observed age-dependent changes in fertility parameters across multiple genetic backgrounds. The PWKB6 and PWKAJ males were always infertile before 15 weeks and after 35 weeks, yet some PWKB6 and PWKAJ males were fertile between fifteen and 35 weeks. This observation could resolve previous contradictory reports about the fertility of PWKB6. Taken together, these results point to multiple segregating HMS modifier alleles, some of which have age-related modes of action. The ultimate identification of these alleles and their age-related mechanisms will advance understanding both of the genetic architecture of HMS and of how reproductive barriers are maintained between house mouse subspecies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document