scholarly journals Cues from neuroepithelium and surface ectoderm maintain neural crest-free regions within cranial mesenchyme of the developing chick

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 1095-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon P. Golding ◽  
Monica Dixon ◽  
Martin Gassmann
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cranial Nerve ◽  
Dorsal Surface ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Free Zone ◽  
Maturational Stage ◽  
Surgical Manipulations

Within the developing vertebrate head, neural crest cells (NCCs) migrate from the dorsal surface of the hindbrain into the mesenchyme adjacent to rhombomeres (r)1 plus r2, r4 and r6 in three segregated streams. NCCs do not enter the intervening mesenchyme adjacent to r3 or r5, suggesting that these regions contain a NCC-repulsive activity. We have used surgical manipulations in the chick to demonstrate that r3 neuroepithelium and its overlying surface ectoderm independently help maintain the NCC-free zone within r3 mesenchyme. In the absence of r3, subpopulations of NCCs enter r3 mesenchyme in a dorsolateral stream and an ectopic cranial nerve forms between the trigeminal and facial ganglia. The NCC-repulsive activity dissipates/degrades within 5-10 hours of r3 removal. Initially, r4 NCCs more readily enter the altered mesenchyme than r2 NCCs, irrespective of their maturational stage. Following surface ectoderm removal, mainly r4 NCCs enter r3 mesenchyme within 5 hours, but after 20 hours the proportions of r2 NCCs and r4 NCCs ectopically within r3 mesenchyme appear similar.

sucker encodes a zebrafish Endothelin-1 required for ventral pharyngeal arch development

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (17) ◽  
pp. 3815-3828 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.T. Miller ◽  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
K. Lee ◽  
J. Parker ◽  
C.B. Kimmel
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Arch Neural

Mutation of sucker (suc) disrupts development of the lower jaw and other ventral cartilages in pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish head. Our sequencing, cosegregation and rescue results indicate that suc encodes an Endothelin-1 (Et-1). Like mouse and chick Et-1, suc/et-1 is expressed in a central core of arch paraxial mesoderm and in arch epithelia, both surface ectoderm and pharyngeal endoderm, but not in skeletogenic neural crest. Long before chondrogenesis, suc/et-1 mutant embryos have severe defects in ventral arch neural crest expression of dHAND, dlx2, msxE, gsc, dlx3 and EphA3 in the anterior arches. Dorsal expression patterns are unaffected. Later in development, suc/et-1 mutant embryos display defects in mesodermal and endodermal tissues of the pharynx. Ventral premyogenic condensations fail to express myoD, which correlates with a ventral muscle defect. Further, expression of shh in endoderm of the first pharyngeal pouch fails to extend as far laterally as in wild types. We use mosaic analyses to show that suc/et-1 functions nonautonomously in neural crest cells, and is thus required in the environment of postmigratory neural crest cells to specify ventral arch fates. Our mosaic analyses further show that suc/et-1 nonautonomously functions in mesendoderm for ventral arch muscle formation. Collectively our results support a model for dorsoventral patterning of the gnathostome pharyngeal arches in which Et-1 in the environment of the postmigratory cranial neural crest specifies the lower jaw and other ventral arch fates.

scholarly journals Neural tube-ectoderm interactions are required for trigeminal placode formation

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4287-4295 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Stark ◽  
J. Sechrist ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser ◽  
C. Marcelle
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Trigeminal Ganglion ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Somite Stage ◽  
Tissue Interactions ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Cranial Sensory Ganglia ◽  
Placode Formation

Cranial sensory ganglia in vertebrates develop from the ectodermal placodes, the neural crest, or both. Although much is known about the neural crest contribution to cranial ganglia, relatively little is known about how placode cells form, invaginate and migrate to their targets. Here, we identify Pax-3 as a molecular marker for placode cells that contribute to the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal ganglion and use it, in conjunction with DiI labeling of the surface ectoderm, to analyze some of the mechanisms underlying placode development. Pax-3 expression in the ophthalmic placode is observed as early as the 4-somite stage in a narrow band of ectoderm contiguous to the midbrain neural folds. Its expression broadens to a patch of ectoderm adjacent to the midbrain and the rostral hindbrain at the 8- to 10-somite stage. Invagination of the first Pax-3-positive cells begins at the 13-somite stage. Placodal invagination continues through the 35-somite stage, by which time condensation of the trigeminal ganglion has begun. To challenge the normal tissue interactions leading to placode formation, we ablated the cranial neural crest cells or implanted barriers between the neural tube and the ectoderm. Our results demonstrate that, although the presence of neural crest cells is not mandatory for Pax-3 expression in the forming placode, a diffusible signal from the neuroectoderm is required for induction and/or maintenance of the ophthalmic placode.

Mechanisms of pigment pattern formation in the quail embryo

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.K. Richardson ◽  
A. Hornbruch ◽  
L. Wolpert
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Larval Fish ◽  
Dorsal Surface ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Mirror Image ◽  
Differential Migration ◽  
Pigment Pattern ◽  
Pigment Patterns ◽  
Local Cues

One hypothesis to account for pigment patterning in birds is that neural crest cells migrate into all feather papillae. Local cues then act upon the differentiation of crest cells into melanocytes. This hypothesis is derived from a study of the quail-chick chimaera (Richardson et al., Development 107, 805–818, 1989). Another idea, derived from work on larval fish and amphibia, is that pigment patterns arise from the differential migration of crest cells. We want to know which of these mechanisms can best account for pigment pattern formation in the embryonic plumage of the quail wing. Most of the feather papillae on the dorsal surface of the wing are pigmented, while many on the ventral surface are white. When ectoderm from unpigmented feather papillae is grown in culture, it gives rise to melanocytes. This indicates that neural crest cells are present in white feathers but that they fail to differentiate. If the wing tip is inverted experimentally then the pigment pattern is inverted also. This is difficult to explain in terms of a model based on migratory pathways, unless one assumes that the pathways became re-routed. When an extra polarizing region is grafted to the anterior margin of the wing bud, a duplication develops in: (1) the pattern of skeletal elements; (2) the pattern of feather papillae; (3) the feather pigment pattern. The pigment pattern was not a precise mirror image although some groups of papillae showed a high degree of symmetry in their pigmentation. Both the tip inversions and the duplications produce discontinuities in the feather and pigment patterns. No evidence of intercalation was found in these cases. We conclude that pigment patterning in birds is determined by local cues acting on melanocyte differentiation, rather than by the differential migration of crest cells. Positional values along the anteroposterior axis of the pigment pattern are determined by a gradient of positional information. Thus the pigment patterns, feather patterns and cartilage patterns of the wing may all be specified by a similar mechanism.

scholarly journals Hoxb3 Regulates Jag1 Expression in Pharyngeal Epithelium and Affects Interaction With Neural Crest Cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoran Zhang ◽  
Junjie Xie ◽  
Karl Kam Hei So ◽  
Ka Kui Tong ◽  
Jearn Jang Sae-Pang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cellular Interaction ◽  
Pharyngeal Arch ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Elevated Expression ◽  
Pharyngeal Epithelium

Craniofacial morphogenesis depends on proper migration of neural crest cells and their interactions with placodes and other cell types. Hox genes provide positional information and are important in patterning the neural crest and pharyngeal arches (PAs) for coordinated formation of craniofacial structures. Hox genes are expressed in the surface ectoderm and epibranchial placodes, their roles in the pharyngeal epithelium and their downstream targets in regulating PA morphogenesis have not been established. We altered the Hox code in the pharyngeal region of the Hoxb3Tg/+ mutant, in which Hoxb3 is driven to ectopically expressed in Hoxb2 domain in the second pharyngeal arch (PA2). In the transgenic mutant, ectopic Hoxb3 expression was restricted to the surface ectoderm, including the proximal epibranchial placodal region and the distal pharyngeal epithelium. The Hoxb3Tg/+ mutants displayed hypoplasia of PA2, multiple neural crest-derived facial skeletal and nerve defects. Interestingly, we found that in the Hoxb3Tg/+ mutant, expression of the Notch ligand Jag1 was specifically up-regulated in the ectodermal pharyngeal epithelial cells of PA2. By molecular experiments, we demonstrated that Hoxb3 could bind to an upstream genomic site S2 and directly regulate Jag1 expression. In the Hoxb3Tg/+ mutant, elevated expression of Jag1 in the pharyngeal epithelium led to abnormal cellular interaction and deficiency of neural crest cells migrating into PA2. In summary, we showed that Hoxb3 regulates Jag1 expression and proposed a model of pharyngeal epithelium and neural crest interaction during pharyngeal arch development.

Spatial organization of the epithelium and the role of neural crest cells in the initiation of the mammalian tooth germ

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. S. Lumsden
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Oral Epithelium ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Mandibular Arch

Teeth develop from composite organ rudiments that are formed through the interaction of oral epithelium and mesenchyme of the first branchial arch; cells of the former differentiate into enamel-secreting ameloblasts whereas those of the latter differentiate into dentine-secreting odontoblasts. Experimental analysis of odontogenic tissue interactions in mammalian embryos has focused on the late developmental stages of morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation; little is known about initial pattern-forming events, during which presumptive tooth-forming cells are specified and the sites of tooth initiation become established. It requires to be shown, for example, whether the mesenchymal cells of mammalian teeth are derived, like those of amphibians, from the cranial neural crest, and if so, whether these form a specified subpopulation in the neural folds. Alternatively, are they specified after migration into the mandibular arch, possibly by interaction with the oral epithelium? The developmental potentials of mouse embryo premigratory cranial neural crest cells (CNC – explanted from the caudal mesencephalic and rostral metencephalic neural folds) have been studied in intraocular homograft recombinations with various regions of embryonic surface ectoderm. Cartilage, bone and neural tissue developed in all combinations of CNC and epithelium. Teeth formed in combinations of CNC with mandibular arch epithelium but not in combinations of CNC with limb bud epithelium. Teeth also formed in combinations of mandibular arch epithelium with neural crest explanted from the trunk level. These results indicate that mammalian neural crest has an odontogenic potential but that this is not restricted to the crest of presumptive tooth-forming levels. Normal migration appears not to be a prerequisite for expression of odontogenic potential but this does require an interaction with region-specific epithelium. It is reasonable to infer that during normal development the neural crest that enters the mandibular arch is odontogenically unspecified before or during migration and that the oral epithelium is the earliest known site of tooth pattern.

Induction of melanocyte precursors from neural crest cells surrounding the neural tube-like structures developed in vitro using mouse ES cell culture

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Koh-ichi Atoh ◽  
Manae S. Kurokawa ◽  
Hideshi Yoshikawa ◽  
Chieko Masuda ◽  
Erika Takada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Culture ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Es Cell ◽  
Mouse Es Cell
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document