Transcriptional activity of MEF2 during mouse embryogenesis monitored with a MEF2-dependent transgene

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (10) ◽  
pp. 2045-2052 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J. Naya ◽  
C. Wu ◽  
J.A. Richardson ◽  
P. Overbeek ◽  
E.N. Olson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neural Cell ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
Mouse Embryogenesis ◽  
Cell Lineages ◽  
Nonmuscle Cell ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Flanking Sequences

The four members of the MEF2 family of MADS-box transcription factors, MEF2-A, MEF2-B, MEF2-C and MEF2-D, are expressed in overlapping patterns in developing muscle and neural cell lineages during embryogenesis. However, during late fetal development and postnatally, MEF2 transcripts are also expressed in a wide range of cell types. Because MEF2 expression is controlled by translational and post-translational mechanisms, it has been unclear whether the presence of MEF2 transcripts in the embryo reflects transcriptionally active MEF2 proteins. To define the temporospatial expression pattern of transcriptionally active MEF2 proteins during mouse embryogenesis, we generated transgenic mice harboring a lacZ reporter gene controlled by three tandem copies of the MEF2 site and flanking sequences from the desmin enhancer, which is active in cardiac, skeletal and smooth muscle cells. Expression of this MEF2-dependent transgene paralleled expression of MEF2 mRNAs in developing myogenic lineages and regions of the adult brain. However, it was not expressed in other cell types that express MEF2 transcripts. Tandem copies of the MEF2 site from the c-jun promoter directed expression in a similar pattern to the desmin MEF2 site, suggesting that transgene expression reflects the presence of transcriptionally active MEF2 proteins, rather than other factors specific for DNA sequences flanking the MEF2 site. These results demonstrate the presence of transcriptionally active MEF2 proteins in the early muscle and neural cell lineages during embryogenesis and argue against the existence of lineage-restricted MEF2 cofactors that discriminate between MEF2 sites with different immediate flanking sequences. The discordance between MEF2 mRNA expression and MEF2 transcriptional activity in nonmuscle cell types of embryos and adults also supports the notion that post-transcriptional mechanisms regulate the expression of MEF2 proteins.

scholarly journals Mapping calcium dynamics in a developing tubular structure

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorgen Hoyer ◽  
Morsal Saba ◽  
Daniel Dondorp ◽  
Kushal Kolar ◽  
Riccardo Esposito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Types ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Cytoskeletal Network ◽  
Notochord Cell ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Store Operated Calcium Entry ◽  
And Function ◽  
Cell Intercalation

AbstractCalcium is a ubiquitous and versatile second messenger that plays a central role in the development and function of a wide range of cell types, tissues and organs. Despite significant recent progress in the understanding of calcium (Ca2+) signalling in organs such as the developing and adult brain, we have relatively little knowledge of the contribution of Ca2+ to the development of tubes, structures widely present in multicellular organisms. Here we image Ca2+ dynamics in the developing notochord of Ciona intestinalis. We show that notochord cells exhibit distinct Ca2+ dynamics during specific morphogenetic events such as cell intercalation, cell elongation and tubulogenesis. We used an optogenetically controlled Ca2+ actuator to show that sequestration of Ca2+ results in defective notochord cell intercalation, and pharmacological inhibition to reveal that stretch-activated ion channels (SACs), inositol triphosphate receptor (IP3R) signalling, Store Operated Calcium Entry (SOCE), Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) and gap junctions are required for regulating notochord Ca2+ activity during tubulogenesis. Cytoskeletal rearrangements drive the cell shape changes that accompany tubulogenesis. In line with this, we show that Ca2+ signalling modulates reorganization of the cytoskeletal network across the morphogenetic events leading up to and during tubulogenesis of the notochord. We additionally demonstrate that perturbation of the actin cytoskeleton drastically remodels Ca2+ dynamics, suggesting a feedback mechanism between actin dynamics and Ca2+ signalling during notochord development. This work provides a framework to quantitatively define how Ca2+ signalling regulates tubulogenesis using the notochord as model organ, a defining structure of all chordates.

scholarly journals Retroviral Transcriptional Regulation and Embryonic Stem Cells: War and Peace

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 770-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Schlesinger ◽  
Stephen P. Goff
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Endogenous Retroviruses ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Cellular Genes ◽  
Wide Range

Retroviruses have evolved complex transcriptional enhancers and promoters that allow their replication in a wide range of tissue and cell types. Embryonic stem (ES) cells, however, characteristically suppress transcription of proviruses formed after infection by exogenous retroviruses and also of most members of the vast array of endogenous retroviruses in the genome. These cells have unusual profiles of transcribed genes and are poised to make rapid changes in those profiles upon induction of differentiation. Many of the transcription factors in ES cells control both host and retroviral genes coordinately, such that retroviral expression patterns can serve as markers of ES cell pluripotency. This overlap is not coincidental; retrovirus-derived regulatory sequences are often used to control cellular genes important for pluripotency. These sequences specify the temporal control and perhaps “noisy” control of cellular genes that direct proper cell gene expression in primitive cells and their differentiating progeny. The evidence suggests that the viral elements have been domesticated for host needs, reflecting the wide-ranging exploitation of any and all available DNA sequences in assembling regulatory networks.

DNA Methylation Abnormality and Brain Dysfunction of Neural Stem Cells Caused by Chronic Inflammation by Nanoparticle Exposure

Impact ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (7) ◽  
pp. 28-30
Author(s):  
Ken Tachibana
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Neural Stem Cells ◽  
Neural Development ◽  
Broad Class ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Brain

The biological development of a human is an extremely complex and delicate process. It starts from fertilisation and continues until long after birth. The creation and development of the brain is particularly complicated and susceptible to disruptions to its progression. The primary cells responsible for the development of the brain are the neural stem cells. These are a broad class of cells that can differentiate into the wide range of cell types that form the adult brain. To achieve this complex process, different cells need to undergo a range of gene expression changes at the right time. This is delicate and its disturbance is a key cause of pathology in a wide range of diseases. There are many external factors that are known to disrupt neural development however, there are several common chemicals whose effects remain largely unknown. One such group are broadly described as nanoparticles. These are small particles that are being increasingly used by many industries as they can help in the creation of products with better properties. However, their effect on the environment and the human body – particularly that of a developing brain – have been largely unexamined. Associate Professor Ken Tachibana of the Division of Hygienic Chemistry, Sanyo-Onoda City University, Japan is researching the effects of nanoparticles on neural development.

scholarly journals Microinjection of fluorescent tracers to study neural cell lineages

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Richard Wetts ◽  
Scott E. Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Level ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neural Retina ◽  
Restricted Range ◽  
Fluorescent Tracers ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Cell Lineages ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Single Phenotype

The examination of cell lineages is an important step towards understanding the developmental events that specify the various cell types in the organism. The mechanisms that control which cell types are formed, their locations, and their numbers remain unknown. Analyses of cell lineage in the frog neural retina have revealed that individual precursors are multipotent and are capable of producing almost any combination of cell types. In addition to giving rise to a wide range of phenotypes, the precursors can give rise to a wide range of clone sizes. Cell lineage studies in other systems indicate that some precursors are multipotent, like those in the retina, while others appear to produce a more restricted range of descendants, perhaps even a single phenotype. These differences in the developmental potential of precursor cells suggest that the nervous system uses several strategies for producing its many cell types. Investigation of these strategies, at the cellular and molecular level, requires more than a description of the normal cell lineages. We are now exploiting the frog neural retina to perform the experimental manipulations needed to elucidate these strategies.

scholarly journals Single-cell transcriptomics characterizes cell types in the subventricular zone and uncovers molecular defects underlying impaired adult neurogenesis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Zywitza ◽  
Aristotelis Misios ◽  
Lena Bunatyan ◽  
Thomas E. Willnow ◽  
Nikolaus Rajewsky
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Adult Neurogenesis ◽  
Subventricular Zone ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neural Cell ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
List Type ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Cell Type Specific

SUMMARYNeural stem cells (NSCs) contribute to plasticity and repair of the adult brain. Niches harboring NSCs are crucial for regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. We used single-cell RNA profiling to generate an unbiased molecular atlas of all cell types in the largest neurogenic niche of the adult mouse brain, the subventricular zone (SVZ). We characterized > 20 neural and non-neural cell types and gained insights into the dynamics of neurogenesis by predicting future cell states based on computational analysis of RNA kinetics. Furthermore, we apply our single-cell approach to mice lacking LRP2, an endocytic receptor required for SVZ maintenance. The number of NSCs and proliferating progenitors was significantly reduced. Moreover, Wnt and BMP4 signaling was perturbed. We provide a valuable resource for adult neurogenesis, insights into SVZ neurogenesis regulation by LRP2, and a proof-of-principle demonstrating the power of single-cell RNA-seq in pinpointing neural cell type-specific functions in loss-of-function models.HIGHLIGHTSunbiased single-cell transcriptomics characterizes adult NSCs and their nichecell type-specific signatures and marker genes for 22 SVZ cell typesFree online tool to assess gene expression across 9,804 single cellscell type-specific dysfunctions underlying impaired adult neurogenesis

scholarly journals Sequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswajyoti Sahu ◽  
Tuomo Hartonen ◽  
Paivi Pihlajamaa ◽  
Bei Wei ◽  
Kashyap Dave ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Atomic Unit ◽  
Gene Regulatory Elements ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Different Cell Types

DNA determines where and when genes are expressed, but the full set of sequence determinants that control gene expression is not known. To obtain a global and unbiased view of the relative importance of different sequence determinants in gene expression, we measured transcriptional activity of DNA sequences that are in aggregate ~100 times longer than the human genome in three different cell types. We show that enhancers can be classified to three main types: classical enhancers1, closed chromatin enhancers and chromatin-dependent enhancers, which act via different mechanisms and differ in motif content. Transcription factors (TFs) act generally in an additive manner with weak grammar, with classical enhancers increasing expression from promoters by a mechanism that does not involve specific TF-TF interactions. Few TFs are strongly active in a cell, with most activities similar between cell types. Chromatin-dependent enhancers are enriched in forkhead motifs, whereas classical enhancers contain motifs for TFs with strong transactivator domains such as ETS and bZIP; these motifs are also found at transcription start site (TSS)-proximal positions. However, some TFs, such as NRF1 only activate transcription when placed close to the TSS, and others such as YY1 display positional preference with respect to the TSS. TFs can thus be classified into four non-exclusive subtypes based on their transcriptional activity: chromatin opening, enhancing, promoting and TSS determining factors — consistent with the view that the binding motif is the only atomic unit of gene expression.

scholarly journals Detecting chromatin interactions along and between sister chromatids with SisterC

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlies E. Oomen ◽  
Adam K. Hedger ◽  
Jonathan K. Watts ◽  
Job Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Brdu Incorporation ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Capture Assay ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Wide Range

AbstractAccurate chromosome segregation requires chromosome compaction with concordant disentanglement of the two sister chromatids. This process has been studied extensively by microscopy but has remained a challenge for genomic methods, such as Hi-C, because sister chromatids have identical DNA sequences. Here we describe SisterC, a chromosome conformation capture assay that can distinguish interactions between and within sister chromatids. The assay is based on BrdU incorporation during S-phase, which labels the newly replicated strands of the sister chromatids. This is followed by Hi-C, e.g. during different stages of mitosis, and the selective destruction of BrdU containing strands by UV/Hoechst treatment. After PCR amplification and sequencing of the remaining intact strands, this allows for the assignment of Hi-C products as inter- and intra-sister interactions by read orientation. We performed SisterC on mitotically arrested S. cerevisiae cells. As expected, we find prominent interactions and alignment of sister chromatids at their centromeres. Along the arms, sister chromatids are less precisely aligned with inter-sister connections every ~35kb. In many instances, inter-sister interactions do not involve the interaction of two identical loci but occur between cohesin binding sites that can be offset by 5 to 25kb. Along sister chromatids, extruding cohesin forms loops up to 50kb. Combined, SisterC allows the observation of the complex interplay between sister chromatid compaction and sister chromatid segregation as the cell transitions from late S-phase to mitosis. SisterC should be applicable to study mitotic events in a wide range of organisms and cell types.

scholarly journals Individual neural cell types express immunologically distinct N-CAM forms.

1985 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
R K Williams ◽  
C Goridis ◽  
R Akeson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lines ◽  
Primary Cultures ◽  
Neuronal Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Neural Cell ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
Molecular Weights ◽  
Adult Rat ◽  
Cerebellar Neuron ◽  
Neuronal Cell Lines

The neural cell adhesion molecules, or N-CAMs, are a group of structurally and immunologically related glycoproteins found in vertebrate neural tissues. Adult brain N-CAMs have apparent molecular weights of 180,000, 140,000, and 120,000. In this article we identify, using monoclonal antibody (Mab) 3G6.41, an immunologically distinct adult rat N-CAM form and show that this form is selectively expressed by some clonal neural cell lines. Consecutive immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that rabbit anti-N-CAM can remove from solubilized cerebellar neuron primary cultures all 180,000- and 140,000-mol-wt N-CAM molecules that react with Mab 3G6.41. However Mab 3G6.41 cannot remove all N-CAM molecules that react with rabbit anti-N-CAM. Rabbit anti-N-CAM binds to and immunoprecipitates N-CAM forms from the rat neuronal cell lines B35, B65, and B104, the glial lines B12 and C6, and L6 myoblasts. Mab 3G6.41 does not bind to or immunoprecipitate N-CAM from the B12 and B65 lines but does react with the other four lines by both criteria. Many cells in primary cultures of postnatal rat that express glial fibrillary acidic protein also bind Mab 3G6.41. Thus a unique form of rat N-CAM recognized by Mab 3G6.41 is found on some but not all neuronal, glial, and muscle cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document