Structure of the insect head as revealed by the EN protein pattern in developing embryos

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (11) ◽  
pp. 3419-3432 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.T. Rogers ◽  
T.C. Kaufman

The structure of the insect head has long been a topic of enjoyable yet endless debate among entomologists. More recently geneticists and molecular biologists trying to better understand the structure of the head of the Dipteran Drosophila melanogaster have joined the discourse extrapolating from what they have learned about Drosophila to insects in general. Here we present the results of an investigation into the structure of the insect head as revealed by the distribution of engrailed related protein (Engrailed) in the insect orders Diptera, Siphonaptera, Orthoptera and Hemiptera. The results of this comparative embryology in conjunction with genetic experiments on Drosophila melanogaster lead us to conclude: (1) The insect head is composed of six Engrailed accumulating segments, four postoral and two preoral. The potential seventh and eighth segments (clypeus or labrum) do not accumulate Engrailed. (2) The structure known as the dorsal ridge is not specific to the Diptera but is homologous to structures found in other insect orders. (3) A part of this structure is a single segment-like entity composed of labial and maxillary segment derivatives which produce the most anterior cuticle capable of taking a dorsal fate. The segments anterior to the maxillary segment produce only ventral structures. (4) As in Drosophila, the process of segmentation of the insect head is fundamentally different from the process of segmentation in the trunk. (5) The pattern of Engrailed accumulation and its presumed role in the specification and development of head segments appears to be highly conserved while its role in other pattern formation events and tissue-specific expression is variable. An overview of the pattern of Engrailed accumulation in developing insect embryos provides a basis for discussion of the generality of the parasegment and the evolution of Engrailed patterns.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e18853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Chen ◽  
Hongzheng Dai ◽  
Sidi Chen ◽  
Luoying Zhang ◽  
Manyuan Long

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 2839-2845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoling Zhao ◽  
Qing Zhu ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Zhiqing Yang ◽  
Yiping Liu

2020 ◽  
Vol 249 (9) ◽  
pp. 1147-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett W. Gershman ◽  
Caroline E. Pritchard ◽  
Kenneth P. Chaney ◽  
Vassie C. Ware

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney M Schroeder ◽  
Sarah A Tomlin ◽  
Isabel Mejia Natividad ◽  
John R Valenzuela ◽  
Janet M Young ◽  
...  

Most actin-related proteins (Arps) are highly conserved and carry out well-defined cellular functions in eukaryotes. However, many lineages like Drosophila and mammals encode divergent non-canonical Arps whose roles remain unknown. To elucidate the function of non-canonical Arps, we focus on Arp53D, which is highly expressed in testes and retained throughout Drosophila evolution. We show that Arp53D localizes to fusomes and actin cones, two germline-specific actin structures critical for sperm maturation, via a unique N-terminal tail. Surprisingly, we find that male fertility is not impaired upon Arp53D loss, yet population cage experiments reveal that Arp53D is required for optimal fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. To reconcile these findings, we focus on Arp53D function in ovaries and embryos where it is only weakly expressed. We find that under heat stress Arp53D-knockout (KO) females lay embryos with reduced nuclear integrity and lower viability; these defects are further exacerbated in Arp53D-KO embryos. Thus, despite its relatively recent evolution and primarily testis-specific expression, non-canonical Arp53D is required for optimal embryonic development in Drosophila.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document