Mox-1 and Mox-2 define a novel homeobox gene subfamily and are differentially expressed during early mesodermal patterning in mouse embryos

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1123-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.F. Candia ◽  
J. Hu ◽  
J. Crosby ◽  
P.A. Lalley ◽  
D. Noden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Structure ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Primitive Streak ◽  
The Body ◽  
Chromosome 11 ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Attachment Sites ◽  
Mesenchymal Transformation ◽  
Anterior Posterior

We have isolated two mouse genes, Mox-1 and Mox-2 that, by sequence, genomic structure and expression pattern, define a novel homeobox gene family probably involved in mesodermal regionalization and somitic differentiation. Mox-1 is genetically linked to the keratin and Hox-2 genes of chromosome 11, while Mox-2 maps to chromosome 12. At primitive streak stages (approximately 7.0 days post coitum), Mox-1 is expressed in mesoderm lying posterior of the future primordial head and heart. It is not expressed in neural tissue, ectoderm, or endoderm. Mox-1 expression may therefore define an extensive ‘posterior’ domain of embryonic mesoderm before, or at the earliest stages of, patterning of the mesoderm and neuroectoderm by the Hox cluster genes. Between 7.5 and 9.5 days post coitum, Mox-1 is expressed in presomitic mesoderm, epithelial and differentiating somites (dermatome, myotome and sclerotome) and in lateral plate mesoderm. In the body of midgestation embryos, Mox-1 signal is restricted to loose undifferentiated mesenchyme. Mox-1 signal is also prominent over the mesenchyme of the heart cushions and truncus arteriosus, which arises from epithelial-mesenchymal transformation and over a limited number of craniofacial foci of neural crest-derived mesenchyme that are associated with muscle attachment sites. The expression profile of Mox-2 is similar to, but different from, that of Mox-1. For example, Mox-2 is apparently not expressed before somites form, is then expressed over the entire epithelial somite, but during somitic differentiation, Mox-2 signal rapidly becomes restricted to sclerotomal derivatives. The expression patterns of these genes suggest regulatory roles for Mox-1 and Mox-2 in the initial anterior-posterior regionalization of vertebrate embryonic mesoderm and, in addition, in somite specification and differentiation.

Ghox 4.7: a chick homeobox gene expressed primarily in limb buds with limb-type differences in expression

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mackem ◽  
K.A. Mahon
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Homeobox Genes ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Limb Morphogenesis ◽  
Degenerate Oligonucleotide ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Homeobox genes play a key role in specifying the segmented body plan of Drosophila, and recent work suggests that at least several homeobox genes may play a regulatory role during vertebrate limb morphogenesis. We have used degenerate oligonucleotide primers from highly conserved domains in the homeobox motif to amplify homeobox gene segments from chick embryo limb bud cDNAs using the polymerase chain reaction. Expression of a large number of homeobox genes (at least 17) is detected using this approach. One of these genes contains a novel homeobox loosely related to the Drosophila Abdominal B class, and was further analyzed by determining its complete coding sequence and evaluating its expression during embryogenesis by in situ hybridization. Based on sequence and expression patterns, we have designated this gene as Ghox 4.7 and believe that it is the chick homologue of the murine Hox 4.7 gene (formerly Hox 5.6). Ghox 4.7 is expressed primarily in limb buds during development and shows a striking spatial restriction to the posterior zone of the limb bud, suggesting a role in specifying anterior-posterior pattern formation. In chick, this gene also displays differences in expression between wing and leg buds, raising the possibility that it may participate in specifying limb-type identity.

The forkhead transcription factor Foxf1 is required for differentiation of extra-embryonic and lateral plate mesoderm

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mahlapuu ◽  
M. Ormestad ◽  
S. Enerback ◽  
P. Carlsson
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Posterior Part ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Primitive Streak ◽  
Yolk Sac ◽  
Lateral Plate Mesoderm ◽  
Forkhead Transcription Factor ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Adhesion Properties

The murine Foxf1 gene encodes a forkhead transcription factor expressed in extra-embryonic and lateral plate mesoderm and later in splanchnic mesenchyme surrounding the gut and its derivatives. We have disrupted Foxf1 and show that mutant embryos die at midgestation due to defects in mesodermal differentiation and cell adhesion. The embryos do not turn and become deformed by the constraints of a small, inflexible amnion. Extra-embryonic structures exhibit a number of differentiation defects: no vasculogenesis occurs in yolk sac or allantois; chorioallantoic fusion fails; the amnion does not expand with the growth of the embryo, but misexpresses vascular and hematopoietic markers. Separation of the bulk of yolk sac mesoderm from the endodermal layer and adherence between mesoderm of yolk sac and amnion, indicate altered cell adhesion properties and enhanced intramesodermal cohesion. A possible cause of this is misexpression of the cell-adhesion protein VCAM1 in Foxf1-deficient extra-embryonic mesoderm, which leads to co-expression of VCAM with its receptor, alpha(4)-integrin. The expression level of Bmp4 is decreased in the posterior part of the embryo proper. Consistent with this, mesodermal proliferation in the primitive streak is reduced and somite formation is retarded. Expression of Foxf1 and the homeobox gene Irx3 defines the splanchnic and somatic mesodermal layers, respectively. In Foxf1-deficient embryos incomplete separation of splanchnic and somatic mesoderm is accompanied by misexpression of Irx3 in the splanchnopleure, which implicates Foxf1 as a repressor of Irx3 and as a factor involved in coelom formation.

Expression of the mouse goosecoid gene during mid-embryogenesis may mark mesenchymal cell lineages in the developing head, limbs and body wall

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 769-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Gaunt ◽  
M. Blum ◽  
E.M. De Robertis
Keyword(s):  
Body Wall ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Mesenchymal Cell ◽  
Primitive Streak ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Sensory Epithelium ◽  
The Body ◽  
Otic Vesicle ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
Branchial Cleft

After an earlier, transient phase of expression in the developing primitive streak of 6.4- to 6.8-day mouse embryos, the homeobox gene goosecoid is now shown to be expressed in a later phase of mouse development, from 10.5 days onwards. The later, spatially restricted domains of goosecoid expression are detected in the head, limbs and ventrolateral body wall. At all sites, the domains of expression are first detected in undifferentiated tissue, and then expression persists as these tissues undergo subsequent morphogenesis. For example, goosecoid expression is noted in the first branchial arch at 10.5 days, and then expression persists as this tissue undergoes morphogenesis to form the lower jaw and the body of the tongue. Expression in tissues around the first branchial cleft persists as these undergo morphogenesis to form the base of the auditory meatus and eustachian tube. Expression in tissues around the newly formed nasal pits persists as these elongate to form the nasal chambers. Expression in the ventral epithelial lining of the otic vesicle persists as this eventually gives rise to the non-sensory epithelium of the cochlea. Expression in the proximal limb buds and ventrolateral body wall persists as these tissues undergo morphogenesis to form proximal limb structures and ventral ribs respectively. Our findings lead us to suggest that the goosecoid gene product plays a role in spatial programming within discrete embryonic fields, and possibly lineage compartments, during organogenesis stages of mouse development.

The chicken CdxA homeobox gene and axial positioning during gastrulation

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 553-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Frumkin ◽  
R. Haffner ◽  
E. Shapira ◽  
N. Tarcic ◽  
Y. Gruenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Primitive Streak ◽  
Immunohistochemical Localization ◽  
Tail Bud ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Tissue Sections ◽  
Whole Mount ◽  
Anterior Posterior

The chicken homebox containing gene, CdxA (formerly CHox-cad), was previously shown to be expressed during gastrulation. Localization of CdxA transcripts by in situ hybridization to tissue sections revealed that, during gastrulation, expression of this gene exhibits a posterior localization along the primitive streak. The transcripts are localized to epiblast cells in the vicinity of the primitive streak, to cells of the primitive streak itself and in the definitive endoderm as it replaces the hypoblast. In order to study in greater detail the pattern of expression of the CdxA gene during gastrulation, we expressed the full-length CdxA protein as a fusion protein in E. coli and generated monoclonal antibodies against it. Chicken embryos at different stages of gastrulation were processed for whole-mount immunohistochemical localization of the protein using anti-CdxA antibodies. Once the pattern of expression in the whole embryo was determined, the same embryos were sectioned to determine the identity of the cells expressing the CdxA protein. Detailed analysis of the CdxA protein in embryos, from the onset of primitive streak formation to the beginning of the tail bud stage (stages 2 to 10), has shown different patterns of expression during primitive streak elongation and regression. The CdxA protein is initially detected at the posterior marginal zone and the expression moves rostrally into the primitive streak during mid-streak stages. As the primitive streak elongates, the CdxA stripe of expression moves anteriorly. By definitive streak stages, the CdxA stripe of expression delineates a position along the anterior-posterior axis in the primitive streak. CdxA, like its Drosophila homologue cad, is expressed during gastrulation in a stripe localized to the posterior region of the embryo. These observations suggest that CdxA as a homebox gene may be part of a regulatory network coupled to axial determination during gastrulation in the early chick embryo.

scholarly journals Molecular insights into the origin of the Hox-TALE patterning system

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Hudry ◽  
Morgane Thomas-Chollier ◽  
Yael Volovik ◽  
Marilyne Duffraisse ◽  
Amélie Dard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Gene Families ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Related Protein ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Body Form ◽  
Eukaryote Evolution ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Despite tremendous body form diversity in nature, bilaterian animals share common sets of developmental genes that display conserved expression patterns in the embryo. Among them are the Hox genes, which define different identities along the anterior–posterior axis. Hox proteins exert their function by interaction with TALE transcription factors. Hox and TALE members are also present in some but not all non-bilaterian phyla, raising the question of how Hox–TALE interactions evolved to provide positional information. By using proteins from unicellular and multicellular lineages, we showed that these networks emerged from an ancestral generic motif present in Hox and other related protein families. Interestingly, Hox-TALE networks experienced additional and extensive molecular innovations that were likely crucial for differentiating Hox functions along body plans. Together our results highlight how homeobox gene families evolved during eukaryote evolution to eventually constitute a major patterning system in Eumetazoans.

scholarly journals Expression patterns of signalling molecules and transcription factors in the early rabbit embryo and their significance for modelling amniote axis formation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Plöger ◽  
Christoph Viebahn
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Body Plan ◽  
The Body ◽  
Anchor Point ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
Point Model ◽  
Signalling Molecules ◽  
Rabbit Embryo

AbstractThe anterior-posterior axis is a central element of the body plan and, during amniote gastrulation, forms through several transient domains with specific morphogenetic activities. In the chick, experimentally proven activity of signalling molecules and transcription factors lead to the concept of a ‘global positioning system’ for initial axis formation whereas in the (mammotypical) rabbit embryo, a series of morphological or molecular domains are part of a putative ‘three-anchor-point model’. Because circular expression patterns of genes involved in axis formation exist in both amniote groups prior to, and during, gastrulation and may thus be suited to reconcile these models, the expression patterns of selected genes known in the chick, namely the ones coding for the transcription factors eomes and tbx6, the signalling molecule wnt3 and the wnt inhibitor pkdcc, were analysed in the rabbit embryonic disc using in situ hybridisation and placing emphasis on their germ layer location. Peripheral wnt3 and eomes expression in all layers is found initially to be complementary to central pkdcc expression in the hypoblast during early axis formation. Pkdcc then appears — together with a posterior-anterior gradient in wnt3 and eomes domains — in the epiblast posteriorly before the emerging primitive streak is marked by pkdcc and tbx6 at its anterior and posterior extremities, respectively. Conserved circular expression patterns deduced from some of this data may point to shared mechanisms in amniote axis formation while the reshaping of localised gene expression patterns is discussed as part of the ‘three-anchor-point model’ for establishing the mammalian body plan.

scholarly journals Extended expression of MaKN1 contributes to the leaf morphology in aquatic forms of Myriophyllum aquaticum

Botany ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 611-621
Author(s):  
M.D. Shafiullah ◽  
Christian R. Lacroix
Keyword(s):  
Apical Meristem ◽  
Leaf Morphology ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Leaf Primordia ◽  
Leaf Primordium ◽  
Myriophyllum Aquaticum ◽  
Knox Gene ◽  
Leaf Morphogenesis

Myriophyllum aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. is heterophyllous in nature with highly dissected simple leaves consisting of several lobes. KNOX (KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX) genes are believed to have played an important role in the evolution of leaf diversity. Up-regulation of KNOX during leaf primordium initiation can lead to leaf dissection in plants with simple leaves and, if overexpressed, can produce ectopic meristems on leaves. A previous study on KNOX gene expression in the aerial form of this species showed that this gene is expressed in the shoot apical meristem (SAM), as well as in leaf primordia P0 to P8. Based on these results, it was hypothesized that the prolonged expression of the MaKN1 (Myriophyllum aquaticum Knotted1-like homeobox) gene beyond P8, might play an important role in the generation of more lobes, longer lobes, and hydathode formation in the aquatic leaves of M. aquaticum. The technique of in situ hybridization was carried out using a previously sequenced 300 bp fragment of MaKN1 to determine the expression patterns of this gene in the shoot of aquatic forms of the plant. Expression patterns of MaKN1 revealed that the SAM and leaf primordia of aquatic forms of M. aquaticum at levels P0 (youngest) to P4 were distributed throughout these structures. The level of expression of this MaKN1 gene progressively became more localized to lobes in older leaf primordia (levels P5 to P12). Previous studies of aerial forms of this plant showed MaKN1 expression until P8. Our results with aquatic forms show that the highly dissected leaf morphology in aquatic forms was the result of the prolonged expression of MaKN1 beyond P8. This resulted in the formation of elongated and slightly more numerous lobes, and hydathodes in aquatic forms. These findings support the view that KNOX genes are important developmental regulators of leaf morphogenesis and have played an important role in the evolution of leaf forms in the plant kingdom.

Coding sequence and expression of the homeobox gene Hox 1.3

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fibi ◽  
B. Zink ◽  
M. Kessel ◽  
A.M. Colberg-Poley ◽  
S. Labeit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Cell System ◽  
T Antigen ◽  
Open Reading Frame ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Chromosome 11 ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
3T3 Fibroblasts

We have characterized Hox 1.3 (previously described as m2), a murine homeobox-containing gene, which is a member of the Hox 1 cluster located on chromosome 6. A cloned cDNA was isolated from an Okayama-Berg library generated from the chemically transformed cell line MB66 MCA ACL6. The protein sequence of 270 amino acids was deduced from the nucleotide sequence of an open reading frame containing the homeobox. The open reading frame is interrupted at the genomic level by a 960 bp intron and is organized in two exons. The Hox 1.3 protein was found to contain extensive sequence homology with the murine homeodomain protein Hox 2.1, which is encoded on chromosome 11. There are two homology with the regions in the first exon, i.e. a hexapeptide conserved in many homeobox-containing genes and the N-terminal domain, which was found to be homologous only to Hox 2.1. Furthermore, in exon 2 the homologies of the homeodomain regions are extended up to the carboxy terminus of Hox 1.3 and Hox 2.1. During prenatal murine development, maximal expression of Hox 1.3 is observed in 12-day embryonic tissue. The two transcripts carrying the Hox 1.3 homeobox are 1.9 kb and about 4 kb in length. An abundant Hox 1.3-specific 1.9 kb RNA is also found in F9 cells which were induced for parietal endoderm differentiation, whereas F9 teratocarcinoma stem cells do not stably express this specific RNA. Induction of the transcript occurs immediately after retinoic acid/cAMP treatment and the RNA level remains high for 5 days. Thus, the kinetics are different from the previously described homeobox transcripts Hox 1.1 and Hox 3.1. Interestingly, by analogy to the F9 cell system a negative correlation between transformation and Hox 1.3 expression is observed in 3T3 fibroblasts also. Untransformed 3T3 cells carry abundant 1.9 kb Hox 1.3 RNA, whereas the methylcholanthrene-transformed MB66 and LTK- cells or 3T3 cells transformed by the oncogenes src, fos or SV40 T antigen express only low levels.

Two enhancer regions in the mouse En-2 locus direct expression to the mid/hindbrain region and mandibular myoblasts

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 905-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Logan ◽  
W.K. Khoo ◽  
D. Cado ◽  
A.L. Joyner
Keyword(s):  
Biochemical Analysis ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Genomic Region ◽  
Lacz Gene ◽  
Lacz Expression ◽  
Adult Mice ◽  
Granular Layers ◽  
Transcribed Sequences ◽  
Anterior Posterior

An En-2/lacZ gene fusion containing 9.5 kb of En-2 genomic DNA was capable of directing lacZ expression in an En-2-specific manner both temporally and spatially during embryogenesis and in the adult. lacZ expression was confined in the embryo to cells within the mid/hindbrain and mandibular arch regions and in the adult to cells of the molecular and granular layers of the cerebellum, and within the pons and colliculi regions. Interestingly, in the adult, transgene expression patterns within the cerebellum in two lines appeared to mark distinct anterior-posterior compartments. Analysis of the expression pattern of this transgene, in fetal and adult mice lacking a functional En-2 protein, provided evidence that the En-2 gene in mouse is not autoregulated. Deletion analysis of the En-2 genomic region and the use of a heterologous promoter identified two enhancer-containing regions of 1.5 and 1.0 kb in length, 5′ of the transcribed sequences, which independently directed expression in the embryo to either the mid/hindbrain region or mandibular myoblasts, respectively. The 1.5 kb fragment contains the most anterior neural enhancer and the 1.0 kb fragment, the earliest myogenic enhancer thus far characterized. These En-2-specific regulatory regions can now be used in a biochemical analysis to identify proteins important in anterior-posterior patterning of the vertebrate CNS and in the specification of muscle identity as well as in a mutational analysis to direct expression of other developmentally important genes to these regions.

Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C. Burke ◽  
C.E. Nelson ◽  
B.A. Morgan ◽  
C. Tabin
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Cervical Vertebrae ◽  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Thoracic Vertebrae ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Evolutionary Variation ◽  
Axial Morphology ◽  
Anterior Posterior ◽  
Anterior Posterior Axis

A common form of evolutionary variation between vertebrate taxa is the different numbers of segments that contribute to various regions of the anterior-posterior axis; cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, etc. The term ‘transposition’ is used to describe this phenomenon. Genetic experiments with homeotic genes in mice have demonstrated that Hox genes are in part responsible for the specification of segmental identity along the anterior-posterior axis, and it has been proposed that an axial Hox code determines the morphology of individual vertebrae (Kessel, M. and Gruss, P. (1990) Science 249, 347–379). This paper presents a comparative study of the developmental patterns of homeobox gene expression and developmental morphology between animals that have homologous regulatory genes but different morphologies. The axial expression boundaries of 23 Hox genes were examined in the paraxial mesoderm of chick, and 16 in mouse embryos by in situ hybridization and immunolocalization techniques. Hox gene anterior expression boundaries were found to be transposed in concert with morphological boundaries. This data contributes a mechanistic level to the assumed homology of these regions in vertebrates. The recognition of mechanistic homology supports the historical homology of basic patterning mechanisms between all organisms that share these genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document