scholarly journals Dynamic Histone Acetylation/Deacetylation with Progesterone Receptor-Mediated Transcription

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 843-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayura Aoyagi ◽  
Trevor K. Archer
Keyword(s):  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Transcription Activation ◽  
Hormone Treatment ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Mmtv Promoter

Abstract Histone acetylation is a highly dynamic posttranslational modification that plays an important role in gene expression. Previous work showed that promoter histone deacetylation is accompanied by progesterone receptor (PR)-mediated activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. We investigated the role of this deacetylation and found that this histone deacetylation is not a singular event. In fact, histone acetylation at the MMTV promoter is highly dynamic, with an initial increase in acetylation followed by an eventual net deacetylation of histone H4. The timing of increase in acetylation of H4 coincides with the time at which PR, RNA polymerase II, and histone acetyltransferases cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein and p300 are recruited to the MMTV promoter. The timing in which histone H4 deacetylation occurs (after PR and RNA polymerase II recruitment) and the limited effect that trichostatin A and small interfering RNA knockdown of histone deacetylase (HDAC)3 have on MMTV transcription suggests that this deacetylation activity is not required for the initiation of PR-mediated transcription. Interestingly, two HDACs, HDAC1 and HDAC3, are already present at the MMTV before transcription activation. HDAC association at the MMTV promoter fluctuates during the hormone treatment. In particular, HDAC3 is temporarily undetected at the MMTV promoter within minutes after hormone treatment when the histone H4 acetylation increases but returns to the promoter near the time when histone acetylation levels start to decline. These results demonstrate the dynamic nature of coactivator/corepressor-promoter association and histone modifications such as acetylation during a transcription activation event.

A common octamer motif binding protein is involved in the transcription of U6 snRNA by RNA polymerase III and U2 snRNA by RNA polymerase II

Cell ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Carbon ◽  
Sylvie Murgo ◽  
Jean-Pierre Ebel ◽  
Alain Krol ◽  
Graham Tebb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
U2 Snrna ◽  
U6 Snrna ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Octamer Motif

scholarly journals RMP, a Novel RNA Polymerase II Subunit 5-Interacting Protein, Counteracts Transactivation by Hepatitis B Virus X Protein

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 7546-7555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorjbal Dorjsuren ◽  
Yong Lin ◽  
Wenxiang Wei ◽  
Tatsuya Yamashita ◽  
Takahiro Nomura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Binding Region ◽  
X Protein ◽  
B Virus

ABSTRACT To modulate transcription, regulatory factors communicate with basal transcription factors and/or RNA polymerases in a variety of ways. Previously, it has been reported that RNA polymerase II subunit 5 (RPB5) is one of the targets of hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) and that both HBx and RPB5 specifically interact with general transcription factor IIB (TFIIB), implying that RPB5 is one of the communicating subunits of RNA polymerase II involved in transcriptional regulation. In this context, we screened for a host protein(s) that interacts with RPB5. By far-Western blot screening, we cloned a novel gene encoding a 508-amino-acid-residue RPB5-binding protein from a HepG2 cDNA library and designated it RPB5-mediating protein (RMP). Expression of RMP mRNA was detected ubiquitously in various tissues. Bacterially expressed recombinant RMP strongly bound RPB5 but neither HBx nor TATA-binding protein in vitro. Endogenous RMP was immunologically detected interacting with assembled RPB5 in RNA polymerase in mammalian cells. The central part of RMP is responsible for RPB5 binding, and the RMP-binding region covers both the TFIIB- and HBx-binding sites of RPB5. Overexpression of RMP, but not mutant RMP lacking the RPB5-binding region, inhibited HBx transactivation of reporters with different HBx-responsive cis elements in transiently transfected cells. The repression by RMP was counteracted by HBx in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, RMP has an inhibitory effect on transcriptional activation by VP16 in the absence of HBx. These results suggest that RMP negatively modulates RNA polymerase II function by binding to RPB5 and that HBx counteracts the negative role of RMP on transcription indirectly by interacting with RPB5.

Co-dependent recruitment of Ino80p and Snf2p is required for yeast CUP1 activation

2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshini N. Wimalarathna ◽  
Po Yun Pan ◽  
Chang-Hui Shen
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Copper Toxicity ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Cup1 Promoter

In yeast, Ace1p-dependent induction of CUP1 is responsible for protecting cells from copper toxicity. Although the mechanism of yeast CUP1 induction has been studied intensively, it is still uncertain which chromatin remodelers are involved in CUP1 transcriptional activation. Here, we show that yeast cells are inviable in the presence of copper when either chromatin remodeler, Ino80p or Snf2p, is not present. This inviability is due to the lack of CUP1 expression in ino80Δ and snf2Δ cells. Subsequently, we observe that both Ino80p and Snf2p are present at the promoter and they are responsible for recruiting chromatin remodeling activity to the CUP1 promoter under induced conditions. These results suggest that they directly participate in CUP1 transcriptional activation. Furthermore, the codependent recruitment of both INO80 and SWI/SNF depends on the presence of the transcriptional activator, Ace1p. We also demonstrate that both remodelers are required to recruit RNA polymerase II and targeted histone acetylation, indicating that remodelers are recruited to the CUP1 promoter before RNA polymerase II and histone acetylases. These observations provide evidence for the mechanism of CUP1 induction. As such, we propose a model that describes novel insight into the order of events in CUP1 activation.

scholarly journals The RNA Polymerase II Kinase Ctk1 Regulates Positioning of a 5′ Histone Methylation Boundary along Genes

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 721-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiaojiang Xiao ◽  
Yoichiro Shibata ◽  
Bhargavi Rao ◽  
R. Nicholas Laribee ◽  
Rose O'Rourke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
H3k4 Methylation ◽  
H3k36 Methylation ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Spurious Transcription ◽  
Transcriptional Stress ◽  
Rnap Ii

ABSTRACT In yeast and other eukaryotes, the histone methyltransferase Set1 mediates methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me). This modification marks the 5′ end of transcribed genes in a 5′-to-3′ tri- to di- to monomethyl gradient and promotes association of chromatin-remodeling and histone-modifying enzymes. Here we show that Ctk1, the serine 2 C-terminal domain (CTD) kinase for RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), regulates H3K4 methylation. We found that CTK1 deletion nearly abolished H3K4 monomethylation yet caused a significant increase in H3K4 di- and trimethylation. Both in individual genes and genome-wide, loss of CTK1 disrupted the H3K4 methylation patterns normally observed. H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 spread 3′ into the bodies of genes, while H3K4 monomethylation was diminished. These effects were dependent on the catalytic activity of Ctk1 but are independent of Set2-mediated H3K36 methylation. Furthermore, these effects are not due to spurious transcription initiation in the bodies of genes, to changes in RNAP II occupancy, to changes in serine 5 CTD phosphorylation patterns, or to “transcriptional stress.” These data show that Ctk1 acts to restrict the spread of H3K4 methylation through a mechanism that is independent of a general transcription defect. The evidence presented suggests that Ctk1 controls the maintenance of suppressive chromatin in the coding regions of genes by both promoting H3K36 methylation, which leads to histone deacetylation, and preventing the 3′ spread of H3K4 trimethylation, a mark associated with transcriptional initiation.

scholarly journals Recruitment of an RNA Polymerase II Complex Is Mediated by the Constitutive Activation Domain in CREB, Independently of CREB Phosphorylation

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1001-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Felinski ◽  
Jeonga Kim ◽  
Jingfang Lu ◽  
Patrick G. Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Camp Response Element Binding ◽  
Creb Binding Protein ◽  
Transcription Activator ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Creb Phosphorylation ◽  
Constitutive Activation ◽  
Creb Activation

ABSTRACT The cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) is a bifunctional transcription activator, exerting its effects through a constitutive activation domain (CAD) and a distinct kinase inducible domain (KID), which requires phosphorylation of Ser-133 for activity. Both CAD and phospho-KID have been proposed to recruit polymerase complexes, but this has not been directly tested. Here, we show that the entire CREB activation domain or the CAD enhanced recruitment of a complex containing TFIID, TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II to a linked promoter. The nuclear extracts used mediated protein kinase A (PKA)-inducible transcription, but phosphorylation of CRG (both of the CREB activation domains fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain) or KID-G4 did not mediate recruitment of a complex, and mutation of the PKA site in CRG abolished transcription induction by PKA but had no effect upon recruitment. The CREB-binding protein (CBP) was not detected in the recruited complex. Our results support a model for transcription activation in which the interaction between the CREB CAD and hTAFII130 of TFIID promotes the recruitment of a polymerase complex to the promoter.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Relationships between TAF1 and Histone Acetyltransferases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 2791-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Durant ◽  
B. Franklin Pugh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferases ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Acetylated Histone H4

ABSTRACT Histone acetylation regulates gene expression, yet the functional contributions of the numerous histone acetyltransferases (HATs) to gene expression and their relationships with each other remain largely unexplored. The central role of the putative HAT-containing TAF1 subunit of TFIID in gene expression raises the fundamental question as to what extent, if any, TAF1 contributes to acetylation in vivo and to what extent it is redundant with other HATs. Our findings herein do not support the basic tenet that TAF1 is a major HAT in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nor do we find that TAF1 is functionally redundant with other HATs, including Gcn5, Elp3, Hat1, Hpa2, Sas3, and Esa1, which is in contrast to previous conclusions regarding Gcn5. Our findings do reveal that of these HATs, only Gcn5 and Esa1 contribute substantially to gene expression genome wide. Interestingly, histone acetylation at promoter regions throughout the genome does not require TAF1 or RNA polymerase II, indicating that most acetylation is likely to precede transcription and not depend upon it. TAF1 function has been linked to Bdf1, which binds TFIID and acetylated histone H4 tails, but no linkage between TAF1 and the H4 HAT Esa1 has been established. Here, we present evidence for such a linkage through Bdf1.

scholarly journals Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of Polypyrimidine Tract-binding Protein Is Uncoupled from RNA Export

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3808-3820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh V. Kamath ◽  
Daniel J. Leary ◽  
Sui Huang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Polypyrimidine Tract ◽  
Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling ◽  
Polypyrimidine Tract Binding ◽  
Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Export

Polypyrimidine tract binding protein, PTB/hnRNP I, is involved in pre-mRNA processing in the nucleus and RNA localization and translation in the cytoplasm. In this report, we demonstrate that PTB shuttles between the nucleus and cytoplasm in an energy-dependent manner. Deletion mutagenesis demonstrated that a minimum of the N terminus and RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) 1 and 2 are necessary for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. Deletion of RRM3 and 4, domains that are primarily responsible for RNA binding, accelerated the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of PTB. Inhibition of transcription directed by either RNA polymerase II alone or all RNA polymerases yielded similar results. In contrast, selective inhibition of RNA polymerase I did not influence the shuttling kinetics of PTB. Furthermore, the intranuclear mobility of GFP-PTB, as measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analyses, increased significantly in transcriptionally inactive cells compared with transcriptionally active cells. These observations demonstrate that nuclear RNA transcription and export are not necessary for the shuttling of PTB. In addition, binding to nascent RNAs transcribed by RNA polymerase II and/or III retards both the nuclear export and nucleoplasmic movement of PTB. The uncoupling of PTB shuttling and RNA export suggests that the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of PTB may also play a regulatory role for its functions in the nucleus and cytoplasm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document