scholarly journals Integration of Prolactin and Glucocorticoid Signaling at the β-Casein Promoter and Enhancer by Ordered Recruitment of Specific Transcription Factors and Chromatin Modifiers

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2355-2368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena B. Kabotyanski ◽  
Markus Huetter ◽  
Wa Xian ◽  
Monique Rijnkels ◽  
Jeffrey M. Rosen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Proximal Promoter ◽  
Hormone Regulation ◽  
Signal Transducer ◽  
Casein Gene ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 1

Abstract Lactogenic hormone regulation of β-casein gene expression in mammary epithelial cells provides an excellent system in which to perform kinetic studies of chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation. Using HC11 cells as a model, we have investigated the effects of prolactin (Prl) and glucocorticoids both singly and in combination at different time points after hormone treatment. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis, we have determined the dynamics of assembly and disassembly of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5, glucocorticoid receptor, CCAAT enhancer binding protein β, and Ying Yang-1 at the hormonally activated β-casein proximal promoter as well as the distal mouse β-casein enhancer located approximately −6 kb upstream of the transcription start site. Prl alone resulted in a rapid recruitment of both signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and histone deacetylase 1 to the β-casein promoter and enhancer, and reciprocally the dissociation of Ying Yang-1 from the proximal promoter. In addition, we have examined the recruitment of coactivator p300 and determined chromatin acetylation status as a function of hormonal treatment. Finally, we have established the time course of RNA polymerase II and phospho-RNA polymerase II accumulation at the β-casein promoter and enhancer after stimulation with hydrocortisone and Prl. Although glucocorticoids alone led to a rapid increase in histone H3 acetylation, treatment with both hormones was required for stable association of p300 and phospho-RNA polymerase II at both the promoter and enhancer. Collectively, these data suggest a model for the assembly of a multiprotein complex that helps to define how the signaling pathways controlled by these lactogenic hormones are integrated to regulate β-casein gene expression.

scholarly journals S-phase-dependent action of cycloheximide in relieving chromatin-mediated general transcriptional repression

1998 ◽  
Vol 336 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya CESARI ◽  
Laurent HÉLIOT ◽  
Catherine MEPLAN ◽  
Michel PABION ◽  
Saadi KHOCHBIN
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Chromatin Assembly

Chromatin plays a major role in the tight regulation of gene expression and in constraining inappropriate gene activity. Replication-coupled chromatin assembly ensures maintenance of these functions of chromatin during S phase of the cell cycle. Thus treatment of cells with an inhibitor of translation, such as cycloheximide (CX), would be expected to have a dramatic effect on chromatin structure and function, essentially in S phase of the cell cycle, due to uncoupled DNA replication and chromatin assembly. In this work, we confirm this hypothesis and show that CX can induce a dramatic S-phase-dependent alteration in chromatin structure that is associated with general RNA polymerase II-dependent transcriptional activation. Using two specific RNA polymerase II-transcribed genes, we confirm the above conclusion and show that CX-mediated transcriptional activation is enhanced during the DNA replication phase of the cell cycle. Moreover, we show co-operation between an inhibitor of histone deacetylase and CX in inducing gene expression, which is again S-phase-dependent. The modest effect of CX in inducing the activity of a transiently transfected promoter shows that the presence of the promoter in an endogenous chromatin context is necessary in order to observe transcriptional activation. We therefore suggest that the uncoupled DNA replication and histone synthesis that occur after CX treatment induces a general modification of chromatin structure, and propose that this general disorganization of chromatin structure is responsible for a widespread activation of RNA polymerase II-mediated gene transcription.

scholarly journals The Mediator Subunit MED16 Transduces NRF2-Activating Signals into Antioxidant Gene Expression

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Sekine ◽  
Keito Okazaki ◽  
Nao Ota ◽  
Hiroki Shima ◽  
Yasutake Katoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Antioxidant Response ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Antioxidant Genes ◽  
Antioxidant Gene Expression

The KEAP1-NRF2 system plays a central role in cytoprotection. NRF2 is stabilized in response to electrophiles and activates transcription of antioxidant genes. Although robust induction of NRF2 target genes confers resistance to oxidative insults, how NRF2 triggers transcriptional activation after binding to DNA has not been elucidated. To decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying NRF2-dependent transcriptional activation, we purified the NRF2 nuclear protein complex and identified the Mediator subunits as NRF2 cofactors. Among them, MED16 directly associated with NRF2. Disruption ofMed16significantly attenuated the electrophile-induced expression of NRF2 target genes but did not affect hypoxia-induced gene expression, suggesting a specific requirement for MED16 in NRF2-dependent transcription. Importantly, we found that 75% of NRF2-activated genes exhibited blunted inductions by electrophiles inMed16-deficient cells compared to wild-type cells, which strongly argues that MED16 is a major contributor supporting NRF2-dependent transcriptional activation. NRF2-dependent phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain was absent inMed16-deficient cells, suggesting that MED16 serves as a conduit to transmit NRF2-activating signals to RNA polymerase II. MED16 indeed turned out to be essential for cytoprotection against oxidative insults. Thus, the KEAP1-NRF2-MED16 axis has emerged as a new regulatory pathway mediating the antioxidant response through the robust activation of NRF2 target genes.

scholarly journals Cotranscriptional Splicing Potentiates the mRNA Production from a Subset of Estradiol-Stimulated Genes

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 5811-5824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Bittencourt ◽  
Martin Dutertre ◽  
Gabriel Sanchez ◽  
Jérôme Barbier ◽  
Lise Gratadou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Production Rate ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Dna Templates ◽  
Cap Binding Complex ◽  
Nascent Transcripts ◽  
First Time

ABSTRACT While early steps of gene expression, such as transcription preinitiation, are known to often be rate limiting and to be regulated by such stimuli as steroid hormones, the potential impact of downstream steps, including splicing, on the mRNA production rate is unknown. In this work, we studied the effects of the transcriptional stimulus estradiol on cyclin D1, PS2, and c-fos gene expression by measuring the levels of RNA polymerase II on the DNA templates, the levels of nascent transcripts associated with RNA polymerase II, and the levels of unspliced, partially spliced, and fully spliced RNAs. We demonstrated that the efficiency of cotranscriptional splicing of the first intron was higher in the case of cyclin D1 than with PS2 and potentiated the cyclin D1 mRNA production rate. The mechanism involved in cotranscriptional splicing depended on the level of serine 5 phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II at the gene 5′ end and on the recruitment of CBP80, one of the two subunits of the cap binding complex, which stimulates splicing of the promoter-proximal intron. Our data indicate that mRNA production from a subset of estradiol-stimulated genes, such as cyclin D1, could occur in a very efficient “assembly line.” In contrast, we demonstrated for the first time that despite a strong transcriptional activation of the PS2 gene, the production of mRNA is not optimized owing to inefficient cotranscriptional RNA processing.

Nutrient-regulated gene expression in eukaryotes

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 85-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Reece ◽  
Laila Beynon ◽  
Stacey Holden ◽  
Amanda D. Hughes ◽  
Karine Rébora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Signalling Pathways ◽  
A Cell ◽  
One Step ◽  
Higher Eukaryotes ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

The recognition of changes in environmental conditions, and the ability to adapt to these changes, is essential for the viability of cells. There are numerous well characterized systems by which the presence or absence of an individual metabolite may be recognized by a cell. However, the recognition of a metabolite is just one step in a process that often results in changes in the expression of whole sets of genes required to respond to that metabolite. In higher eukaryotes, the signalling pathway between metabolite recognition and transcriptional control can be complex. Recent evidence from the relatively simple eukaryote yeast suggests that complex signalling pathways may be circumvented through the direct interaction between individual metabolites and regulators of RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription. Biochemical and structural analyses are beginning to unravel these elegant genetic control elements.

scholarly journals Repression of ESR1 through Actions of Estrogen Receptor Alpha and Sin3A at the Proximal Promoter

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 4949-4958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Ellison-Zelski ◽  
Natalia M. Solodin ◽  
Elaine T. Alarid
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Alpha ◽  
Proximal Promoter ◽  
Receptor Alpha ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Activation Of Transcription

ABSTRACT Gene expression results from the coordinated actions of transcription factor proteins and coregulators. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that can both activate and repress the expression of genes. Activation of transcription by estrogen-bound ERα has been studied in detail, as has antagonist-induced repression, such as that which occurs by tamoxifen. How estrogen-bound ERα represses gene transcription remains unclear. In this report, we identify a new mechanism of estrogen-induced transcriptional repression by using the ERα gene, ESR1. Upon estrogen treatment, ERα is recruited to two sites on ESR1, one distal (ENH1) and the other at the proximal (A) promoter. Coactivator proteins, namely, p300 and AIB1, are found at both ERα-binding sites. However, recruitment of the Sin3A repressor, loss of RNA polymerase II, and changes in histone modifications occur only at the A promoter. Reduction of Sin3A expression by RNA interference specifically inhibits estrogen-induced repression of ESR1. Furthermore, an estrogen-responsive interaction between Sin3A and ERα is identified. These data support a model of repression wherein actions of ERα and Sin3A at the proximal promoter can overcome activating signals at distal or proximal sites and ultimately decrease gene expression.

RNA polymerase II cofactor PC2 facilitates activation of transcription by GAL4-AH in vitro

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 3927-3937
Author(s):  
M Kretzschmar ◽  
G Stelzer ◽  
R G Roeder ◽  
M Meisterernst
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Activation Of Transcription ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domains ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Specific Pathway

We have isolated from a crude Hela cell cofactor fraction (USA) a novel positive cofactor that cooperates with the general transcription machinery to effect efficient stimulation of transcription by GAL4-AH, a derivative of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae regulatory factor GAL4. PC2 was shown to be a 500-kDa protein complex and to be functionally and biochemically distinct from native TFIID and previously identified cofactors. In the presence of native TFIID and other general factors, PC2 was necessary and sufficient for activation by GAL4-AH. Cofactor function was specific for transcriptional activation domains of GAL4-AH. The repressor histone H1 further potentiated but was not required for activation of transcription by GAL4-AH. On the basis of the observation that PC2 exerts entirely positive effects on transcription, we propose a model in which PC2 increases the activity of the preinitiation complex in the presence of an activator, thereby establishing a specific pathway during activation of RNA polymerase II.

scholarly journals The Swi/Snf Chromatin Remodeling Complex Is Required for Ribosomal DNA and Telomeric Silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 8227-8235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vardit Dror ◽  
Fred Winston
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Rdna Locus ◽  
Detectable Effect ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling Complex ◽  
Two Factors

ABSTRACT The Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex has been previously demonstrated to be required for transcriptional activation and repression of a subset of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this work we demonstrate that Swi/Snf is also required for repression of RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription in the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus (rDNA silencing). This repression appears to be independent of both Sir2 and Set1, two factors known to be required for rDNA silencing. In contrast to many other rDNA silencing mutants that have elevated levels of rDNA recombination, snf2Δ mutants have a significantly decreased level of rDNA recombination. Additional studies have demonstrated that Swi/Snf is also required for silencing of genes near telomeres while having no detectable effect on silencing of HML or HMR.

scholarly journals Acute perturbation strategies in interrogating RNA polymerase II elongation factor function in gene expression

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 273-285
Author(s):  
Bin Zheng ◽  
Yuki Aoi ◽  
Avani P. Shah ◽  
Marta Iwanaszko ◽  
Siddhartha Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Factor Function

Co-dependent recruitment of Ino80p and Snf2p is required for yeast CUP1 activation

2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshini N. Wimalarathna ◽  
Po Yun Pan ◽  
Chang-Hui Shen
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Copper Toxicity ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Cup1 Promoter

In yeast, Ace1p-dependent induction of CUP1 is responsible for protecting cells from copper toxicity. Although the mechanism of yeast CUP1 induction has been studied intensively, it is still uncertain which chromatin remodelers are involved in CUP1 transcriptional activation. Here, we show that yeast cells are inviable in the presence of copper when either chromatin remodeler, Ino80p or Snf2p, is not present. This inviability is due to the lack of CUP1 expression in ino80Δ and snf2Δ cells. Subsequently, we observe that both Ino80p and Snf2p are present at the promoter and they are responsible for recruiting chromatin remodeling activity to the CUP1 promoter under induced conditions. These results suggest that they directly participate in CUP1 transcriptional activation. Furthermore, the codependent recruitment of both INO80 and SWI/SNF depends on the presence of the transcriptional activator, Ace1p. We also demonstrate that both remodelers are required to recruit RNA polymerase II and targeted histone acetylation, indicating that remodelers are recruited to the CUP1 promoter before RNA polymerase II and histone acetylases. These observations provide evidence for the mechanism of CUP1 induction. As such, we propose a model that describes novel insight into the order of events in CUP1 activation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document