scholarly journals A Slight Decrease in Renal Function Further Impairs Bone Mineral Density in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (8) ◽  
pp. 3011-3016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Gianotti ◽  
Francesco Tassone ◽  
Flora Cesario ◽  
Anna Pia ◽  
Paola Razzore ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The impairment of renal function can affect the clinical presentation of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), increasing cardiovascular morbidity, fracture rate, and the risk of mortality. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the differences in bone status in a series of consecutive patients affected by PHPT without overt renal failure at diagnosis grouped according to creatinine clearance (Ccr). Methods: A total of 161 consecutive patients with PHPT were studied. They were divided into two groups based on Ccr. Group A had Ccr 70 ml/min or less (n = 49), and group B had Ccr greater than 70 ml/min (n = 112). PTH, total and ionized serum calcium; urinary calcium and phosphate; serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3; serum and urinary bone markers; lumbar, forearm, and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated. Results: Patients in group A were older than those in group B (P < 0.0001). PTH levels did not differ in the two groups, whereas both urinary calcium and phosphorus were lower in group A than group B (P < 0.01). Lower BMD was evident in group A at lumbar spine (P < 0.002), forearm (P < 0.0001), and femur (P < 0.01). In asymptomatic PHPT, those with Ccr 70 ml/min or less had lower forearm BMD than patients with higher Ccr (P < 0.00001). When adjusting for age and body mass index in PHPT, BMD at each site persisted being lower (P < 0.05) in group A than group B. In all PHPT subjects, Ccr (beta = 0.29, P < 0.0005), age (beta = −0.27, P < 0.00001), and PTH levels (beta = −0.27, P < 0.0005) were all independently associated with forearm BMD. Conclusions: In PHPT a slight decrease in renal function is associated with more severe BMD decrease, independent of age, body mass index, and PTH levels. This association is also present in asymptomatic PHPT and strengthens the National Institutes of Health recommendations for surgery in patients with mild PHPT.

Author(s):  
Lavanya Cherukuri ◽  
April Kinninger ◽  
Divya Birudaraju ◽  
Suvasini Lakshmanan ◽  
Dong Li ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K. Bachrach ◽  
David Guido ◽  
Debra Katzman ◽  
Iris F. Litt ◽  
Robert Marcus

Osteoporosis develops in women with chronic anorexia nervosa. To determine whether bone mass is reduced in younger patients as well, bone density was studied in a group of adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa. With single- and dual-photon absorptiometry, a comparison was made of bone mineral density of midradius, lumbar spine, and whole body in 18 girls (12 to 20 years of age) with anorexia nervosa and 25 healthy control subjects of comparable age. Patients had significantly lower lumbar vertebral bone density than did control subjects (0.830 ± 0.140 vs 1.054 ± 0.139 g/cm2) and significantly lower whole body bone mass (0.700 ± 0.130 vs 0.955 ± 0.130 g/cm2). Midradius bone density was not significantly reduced. Of 18 patients, 12 had bone density greater than 2 standard deviations less than normal values for age. The diagnosis of anorexia nervosa had been made less than 1 year earlier for half of these girls. Body mass index correlated significantly with bone mass in girls who were not anorexic (P < .05, .005, and .0001 for lumbar, radius, and whole body, respectively). Bone mineral correlated significantly with body mass index in patients with anorexia nervosa as well. In addition, age at onset and duration of anorexia nervosa, but not calcium intake, activity level, or duration of amenorrhea correlated significantly with bone mineral density. It was concluded that important deficits of bone mass occur as a frequent and often early complication of anorexia nervosa in adolescence. Whole body is considerably more sensitive than midradius bone density as a measure of cortical bone loss in this illness. Low body mass index is an important predictor of this reduction in bone mass.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rodríguez-Carrio ◽  
A. Martínez-Zapico ◽  
I. Cabezas-Rodríguez ◽  
L. Benavente ◽  
Á.I. Pérez-Álvarez ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Homayoun Sheikholeslami ◽  
Majid Sotodeh ◽  
Amir Javadi ◽  
Neda Nasirian ◽  
Amir Mohammad Kazemifar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz F. Hariri ◽  
Mohammad N. Almatrafi ◽  
Aws B. Zamka ◽  
Abdullah S. Babaker ◽  
Tariq M. Fallatah ◽  
...  

Diabetes mellitus (DM) cases are increasing worldwide, especially in Saudi Arabia. Previous studies suggested a positive relationship between body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD) levels. Generally, patients with low BMI (<18.5 kg/m2) have reduced BMD levels and, thus, low T-scores; hence, they are categorized as osteopenic or osteoporotic. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a relationship between BMI and BMD T-scores in the hip and spine regions of patients with diabetes exists. This retrospective record review investigated older adult patients with diabetes in King Abdulaziz University Hospital (n=198; age 50–90 years) who underwent BMD scan between January 1, 2016, and June 25, 2018, regardless of their sex but limited to type 2 DM. The height and weight of all subjects were recorded, and BMI was calculated and categorized. We used SPSS version 21 for data analysis; measures of central tendencies, Pearson’s correlations, chi-square tests, and independent t-tests were employed. We found positive relationships between BMI and BMD T-scores in the hip and spine regions (right femoral neck: R=+0.214, P≤0.002; total right hip: R=+0.912, P≤0.001; left femoral neck: R=+0.939, P≤0.001; total left hip: R=+0.885, P≤0.001; and total lumbar region: R=+0.607, P≤0.001). Low BMI (<18.5 kg/m2) could be a risk factor for osteoporosis, whereas normal/high BMI could be protective against osteoporosis among adults with diabetes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 19569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmela Pinnetti ◽  
Lupi Federico ◽  
Patrizia Lorenzini ◽  
Chiappetta Domenico ◽  
Bellagamba Rita ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document