Boating and SCUBA Accidents, Low-Head Dams, and Beach Renourishment

2018 ◽  
pp. 261-280
Author(s):  
John R. Fletemeyer
Keyword(s):  
Low Head ◽  
Shore & Beach ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
Derek Brockbank ◽  
Annie Mercer ◽  
Peter Ravella ◽  
Tyler Buckingham ◽  
Shannon Cunniff ◽  
...  

The goal of this paper is to help coastal managers and elected officials think about how to fund beach renourishment and coastal restoration projects. The paper briefly reviews the evolution of funding policies, introduces funding considerations based on project characteristics, and outlines funding tools or mechanisms to consider.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily A. Brown ◽  
◽  
Martha Carlson Mazur ◽  
Cassie Hauswald

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 4618
Author(s):  
Antonio Mariani ◽  
Gaetano Crispino ◽  
Pasquale Contestabile ◽  
Furio Cascetta ◽  
Corrado Gisonni ◽  
...  

Overtopping-type wave power conversion devices represent one of the most promising technology to combine reliability and competitively priced electricity supplies from waves. While satisfactory hydraulic and structural performance have been achieved, the selection of the hydraulic turbines and their regulation is a complex process due to the very low head and a variable flow rate in the overtopping breakwater set-ups. Based on the experience acquired on the first Overtopping BReakwater for Energy Conversion (OBREC) prototype, operating since 2016, an activity has been carried out to select the most appropriate turbine dimension and control strategy for such applications. An example of this multivariable approach is provided and illustrated through a case study in the San Antonio Port, along the central coast of Chile. In this site the deployment of a breakwater equipped with OBREC modules is specifically investigated. Axial-flow turbines of different runner diameter are compared, proposing the optimal ramp height and turbine control strategy for maximizing system energy production. The energy production ranges from 20.5 MWh/y for the smallest runner diameter to a maximum of 34.8 MWh/y for the largest runner diameter.


2022 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 101810
Author(s):  
Subodh Khullar ◽  
Krishna M. Singh ◽  
Michel J. Cervantes ◽  
Bhupendra K. Gandhi

2019 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 266-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.H. Sotoude Haghighi ◽  
S.M. Mirghavami ◽  
S.F. Chini ◽  
A. Riasi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document